Re: [Desktop 12.10 Topic] Quality, testability for the desktop components

2012-04-19 Thread Rick Spencer
Sebestien, Are you looking for discussion on these topics on this list? If so, I would suggest that Libre Office might be a good candidate for us to offer regular integration tests. I know that Libre Office has a test suite, it might be very useful to run these tests daily on Ubuntu (to discover

Re: [Desktop 12.10 Topic] Quality, testability for the desktop components

2012-04-19 Thread David Klasinc
On 04/18/2012 10:39 AM, Sebastien Bacher wrote: It would be also nice to see regular run and report of the testsuits for other components which already have one (i.e glib, gtk) and some testing of their rdepends before upload. Almost a year ago, I wrote a short summary on current situation

Re: [Desktop 12.10 Topic] Quality, testability for the desktop components

2012-04-19 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:17:21AM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote: I agree that libreoffice would be a good fit, especially if it has a test suite already. Bjoern, do you think it's feasible? Yes, I had a call about that with the QA team already. There are multiple ways this could be done. Im in

Re: [Desktop 12.10 Topic] Quality, testability for the desktop components

2012-04-19 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi all, On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:17:21AM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote: I agree that libreoffice would be a good fit, especially if it has a test suite already. Bjoern, do you think it's feasible? So, we have 3 possible sources of bugs/regressions/test failures for LibreOffice on Ubuntu: -

[Desktop 12.10 Topic] Quality,testability for the desktop components

2012-04-18 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Hey, The Canonical upstream teams did some good progresses on testing and quality this cycle, that's a good step for the Ubuntu Desktop quality, we still rely on quite some components from other upstreams though that didn't engage into a such process yet though (those who looked at