Hi,
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 17:52 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Apologies for the delay in response, responses inline.
This isn't about maintenance as much as a uniform browser experience.
The theory being that casual users don't care about the latest and
greatest stuff as long as they know
Apologies for the delay in response, responses inline.
On 04/18/2011 09:05 AM, Chris Coulson wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 10:36 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Since now both Firefox and Chromium have committed to rapid release
schedules, I think it's time to reevaluate the default browser in
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 10:36 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Since now both Firefox and Chromium have committed to rapid release
schedules, I think it's time to reevaluate the default browser in
Ubuntu. I am concerned that some of these upgrades might break system
integration at some point. While
Le lundi 18 avril 2011 à 15:05 +0100, Chris Coulson a écrit :
I see a lot of people are recommending Epiphany. I've used this before,
but it's never been my default browser. I used it again today, for the
first time in a year or so. Here's a brief summary of some of the things
I noticed:
-
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 10:36 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Since now both Firefox and Chromium have committed to rapid release
schedules, I think it's time to reevaluate the default browser in
Ubuntu. I am concerned that some of these upgrades might break system
integration at some point. While
Please note, I was suggesting not having Firefox or Chromium as the
default, but a webkit based browser with a normal release cycle like
Epiphany (which uses webkitgtk :)).
Hey all,
Well there are two ways you can look at this.
1. Recognized brands like Chrome and Firefox which most people
Hi Chris,
Maybe I was presuming a bit of things :)
Firefox I don't think ever fit in because of XUL.
I'd like to know why you think Firefox won't ever fit in because of XUL?
After all, it's just another toolkit (like QT is just another toolkit,
or perhaps you think that QT wouldn't fit in
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Micah Gersten mic...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Since now both Firefox and Chromium have committed to rapid release
schedules, I think it's time to reevaluate the default browser in
Ubuntu. I am concerned that some of these upgrades might break system
integration at
Sounds like Chromium meets the standards for that one. I'm assuming
that there'd be Ubuntu-ifed branding for it, similar to that of
Firefox (ubu-fox)? That's if it were to become standard.
On 2011-04-09, Dylan McCall dylanmcc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Micah Gersten
On 9 April 2011 15:55, Dylan McCall dylanmcc...@gmail.com wrote:
One nice thing with Chromium and Epiphany is they store passwords
using the native keyring daemon. (Epiphany always has, Chromium
recently has and it should be enabled by default at this point). That
is, passwords are properly
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 17:27 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Please note, I was suggesting not having Firefox or Chromium as the
default, but a webkit based browser with a normal release cycle like
Epiphany (which uses webkitgtk :)).
If I'v understood that right, what you are suggesting is we use
Since now both Firefox and Chromium have committed to rapid release
schedules, I think it's time to reevaluate the default browser in
Ubuntu. I am concerned that some of these upgrades might break system
integration at some point. While the security team does its best to
prevent regressions, we
12 matches
Mail list logo
