On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 00:21 -0600, Richard JOHNSON wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 01:45:53AM -0500, Alain-Olivier Breysse wrote:
Bonjour,
The motivation of your decision is already being talked about around the
net in many different languages, and because it is the net, will continue
On 02/05/2010 01:16 PM, petr bug wrote:
On 5 February 2010 16:53, David A. Cobbsuperbis...@cox.net wrote:
Above all, never never compromise the principle that the user is the one to
say what her experience should look like -- no matter what marketing choices
Canonical gets involved in.
In
May I suggest, we could leave the choice entirely up to the user (
who, after all, is IN CHARGE ) by defaulting to a page like that in
Epiphany Browser. Welcome to Ubuntu. And, include on this page
something like: You can start browsing from a default search page. To
do so, please choose: [ ]
On 5 February 2010 16:53, David A. Cobb superbis...@cox.net wrote:
Above all, never never compromise the principle that the user is the one to
say what her experience should look like -- no matter what marketing choices
Canonical gets involved in.
In principle, user is in charge of ~1 million
On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 19:16 +0100, petr bug wrote:
On 5 February 2010 16:53, David A. Cobb superbis...@cox.net wrote:
Above all, never never compromise the principle that the user is the one to
say what her experience should look like -- no matter what marketing choices
Canonical gets
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 12:03 -0800, Rick Spencer wrote:
All -
I am writing to apprise you of two small but important changes coming to
Firefox in Lucid. I have asked the desktop team to start preparing
these changes to make them available in Lucid as soon as reasonably
possible. Probably on
Hi,
will you change the keyword.URL setting also, which is currently set to Google?
It's used when you type random stuff into the address bar.
Regards
/Ernst
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 21:03, Rick Spencer rick.spen...@canonical.com wrote:
All -
I am writing to apprise you of two small but
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Rick Spencer
rick.spen...@canonical.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 11:24 -0500, Martin Owens wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 12:03 -0800, Rick Spencer wrote:
All -
I am writing to apprise you of two small but important changes coming to
Firefox in Lucid.
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 11:24 -0500, Martin Owens wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 12:03 -0800, Rick Spencer wrote:
All -
I am writing to apprise you of two small but important changes coming to
Firefox in Lucid. I have asked the desktop team to start preparing
these changes to make them
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 12:03 -0800, Rick Spencer wrote:
All -
Why?
I am pursuing this change because Canonical has negotiated a revenue
sharing deal with Yahoo! and this revenue will help Canonical to provide
developers and resources to continue the open development of Ubuntu and
the
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 15:00 +0530, Vishnoo wrote:
Users are redirected to
http://in.mg4.mail.yahoo.com/dc/system_requirements?os=unsupported
This happens *every* time one tries to login.[attaching screenshot]
If we are considering moving Ubuntu to Yahoo! search as default.
Atleast
It's a little diferent of the Microsoft changing the Firefox default search
engine but don't you think the users will complain the same way?
I really think that users should be. at least, notified during update.
··~Ricardo Cacheta Waldemarin ⠠⠵
Graduando em Informática Biomédica USP-RP~··
On Di, Jan 26, 2010 at 21:03:01 (CET), Rick Spencer wrote:
Change #2
Change #2 is changing the default search provider in Firefox to Yahoo!
Can this default be configured on a system wide level? I imagine that
sites with mass deployments of lucid would want to have the option to
configure
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 19:08, Rick Spencer rick.spen...@canonical.comwrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 15:14 -0500, Celeste Lyn Paul wrote:
Since Google is the current default, will the switch to Yahoo only
have an effect on new installs?
No, this will effect upgrades if the computer is
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 20:46, Rick Spencer rick.spen...@canonical.comwrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 20:17 -0200, Carlos Ribeiro wrote:
Given the sensitivity of this change for many people, I would ask you
to consider keeping the current setting whatever it is (Google or
not). People tend
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 21:00, Carlos Ribeiro carribe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 20:46, Rick Spencer rick.spen...@canonical.comwrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 20:17 -0200, Carlos Ribeiro wrote:
Given the sensitivity of this change for many people, I would ask you
to
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Rick Spencer rick.spen...@canonical.comwrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 15:14 -0500, Celeste Lyn Paul wrote:
Since Google is the current default, will the switch to Yahoo only
have an effect on new installs?
No, this will effect upgrades if the computer is
Hi all,
Glad this Canonical is getting a search revenue stream, I just have a few
concerns that I haven't seen discussed.
Does Yahoo have an equivalent of I'm Feeling Lucky for the Firefox
awesomebar or is google still going to be providing that? If you switch
that functionality to just being a
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Rick Spencer
rick.spen...@canonical.com wrote:
Why?
I am pursuing this change because Canonical has negotiated a revenue
sharing deal with Yahoo! and this revenue will help Canonical to provide
developers and resources to continue the open development of Ubuntu
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 15:14 -0500, Celeste Lyn Paul wrote:
Since Google is the current default, will the switch to Yahoo only
have an effect on new installs?
No, this will effect upgrades if the computer is currently set to
Google. This is not because of anything special for this particular
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 17:36 -0500, Dan Trevino wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Rick Spencer
rick.spen...@canonical.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 15:14 -0500, Celeste Lyn Paul wrote:
Since Google is the current default, will the switch to
Yahoo
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 20:17 -0200, Carlos Ribeiro wrote:
Given the sensitivity of this change for many people, I would ask you
to consider keeping the current setting whatever it is (Google or
not). People tend to be very passionate about such issues. Also, keep
in mind that for many
Reinhard Tartler [2010-01-27 7:30 +0100]:
Can this default be configured on a system wide level? I imagine that
sites with mass deployments of lucid would want to have the option to
configure this, e.g., via debconf preseeding.
I expect that could just go into /etc/firefox/pref/firefox.js ?
23 matches
Mail list logo
