Le jeudi 25 septembre 2008, à 18:30 +0200, Cesare Tirabassi a écrit :
Anyway, are the tools you use to generate that page open source? I'd be
interested to see how you fetch the data (especially for stuff not hosted on
ftp.gnome.org).
It's not just open source, it's free :-)
It's in
Le lundi 22 septembre 2008 à 13:41 +0200, Cesare Tirabassi a écrit :
My problem is that many of these packages are not maintained by the
Ubuntu
Desktop Team, so I'm not sure that it is appropriate to list them all
in this
page; what I would really need is a list from the pov of the Ubuntu
Le mercredi 24 septembre 2008 à 23:50 +0200, Cesare Tirabassi a écrit :
Please let me know of any issue, its all pretty much new so I expect
few
things still need to be ironed out.
Hi,
The page looks great, I'm not decided about how we should claim updates
though. Some packages are actively
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
The page looks great, I'm not decided about how we should claim updates
though. Some packages are actively maintained by one person and some
other can be claimed by the first one wanting to do the update. Did you
use the wiki usual uploader informations? Does everybody
On Thursday 25 September 2008 13:15:48 Sebastien Bacher wrote:
Some packages are actively maintained by one person and some
other can be claimed by the first one wanting to do the update
Did you use the wiki usual uploader informations?
Yes.
Where should we store this list so it can be
2008/9/24 Cesare Tirabassi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Monday 22 September 2008 16:40:49 Didier Roche wrote:
The missing thing for me is to link to a bug that wait for sponsor
(for instance, I have updated gnome-volume-manager, gnome-spell and it
is waiting for sponsoring).
Got that and a bit more
Le jeudi 25 septembre 2008, à 17:38 +0200, Didier Roche a écrit :
For you information, I spoke with Vincent Untz at PCL (french
promotion event) and he shew me this link:
http://tmp.vuntz.net/opensuse-packages/obs.py
This tools has the same goal for the OpenSUSE distribution and a
command
On Thursday 25 September 2008 17:52:39 Vincent Untz wrote:
Need to leave soon, so I don't really have time to write down how this
works right now -- but yeah, ask questions!
.
.
.
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
I found this hilarious :-)
Anyway, are the tools you use to generate
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 00:03 +0200, Cesare Tirabassi wrote:
So far I cleaned up the portal, created a new header entry (news, for the
monthly report) and created a new page which lists all desktop owned packages
with ubuntu and debian versions:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Desktop/Packages
On Tuesday 23 September 2008 13:15:59 Scott James Remnant wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 00:03 +0200, Cesare Tirabassi wrote:
So far I cleaned up the portal, created a new header entry (news, for the
monthly report) and created a new page which lists all desktop owned
packages with ubuntu and
I finally hacked a little script during the weekend and you can see the
results here (updated daily):
http://www.webalice.it/norsetto/
This only retrieves upstream package versions for packages which are hosted on
ftp.gnome.org, I'd have to add a special section in the script for retrieving
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Cesare Tirabassi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I finally hacked a little script during the weekend and you can see the
results here (updated daily):
http://www.webalice.it/norsetto/
I'm happy there is such a tool to keep an eye on version even If I
don't
On Monday 22 September 2008 13:04:39 Baptiste Mille-Mathias wrote:
One problem I see is that the page suggest future unstable version as
upstream - for instance metacity maintainers have already release a
version 2.25.x for next cycle (2.26) and I'm not sure we want to stick
with that version
Cesare Tirabassi wrote:
My problem is that many of these packages are not maintained by the Ubuntu
Desktop Team, so I'm not sure that it is appropriate to list them all in this
page; what I would really need is a list from the pov of the Ubuntu team.
IMHO it's nice to have them. Although the
2008/9/22 Cesare Tirabassi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I finally hacked a little script during the weekend and you can see the
results here (updated daily):
http://www.webalice.it/norsetto/
This only retrieves upstream package versions for packages which are hosted on
ftp.gnome.org, I'd have to add
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 22:00:54 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
I also think it used rmadison before using dak directly (or rather
./my-rmadison).
Yes, I use the dak ls interface directly too in my script, using rmadison is
an overkill.
Cesare
--
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 02:14:28 Pedro Fragoso wrote:
Maybe we can use and change debian-gnome-status.py from Debian
http://www.0d.be/debian/debian-gnome-2.22-status.html to gen the
versions.
Looks cool. I checked this out but fails on me with:
File
Pedro Fragoso wrote:
Maybe we can use and change debian-gnome-status.py from Debian
http://www.0d.be/debian/debian-gnome-2.22-status.html to gen the
versions.
This scripts uses dak and searches on the pkg-gnome svn the versions,
perhaps we can change this to use rmadison and work from
Dear all,
after having talked with Seb, I have started cleaning-up the desktop team wiki
pages (so, don't worry if you don't find things in their usual places ...).
So far I cleaned up the portal, created a new header entry (news, for the
monthly report) and created a new page which lists all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cesare Tirabassi wrote:
I would appreciate to know if I missed any desktop package or if I should
remove any from this list.
I think, seahorse-plugins is missing from the list.
Regards, Andreas Moog
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 00:03 +0200, Cesare Tirabassi wrote:
Dear all,
after having talked with Seb, I have started cleaning-up the desktop team
wiki
pages (so, don't worry if you don't find things in their usual places ...).
So far I cleaned up the portal, created a new header entry
21 matches
Mail list logo
