Re: Shipping fspot instead of gthumb

2006-07-19 Thread Matthew East
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, * Corey Burger: Hey all, Time to start yet another discussion. Hopefully this will not go offtopic as badly my last one did. Anyway, I think we should ship fspot in place of gthumb. I just installed f-spot to try it, and quite like it, but

Re: Shipping fspot instead of gthumb

2006-07-18 Thread Sebastien Bacher
On lun, 2006-07-17 at 09:51 +0200, Lionel Dricot wrote: But when you double-click on a picture somewhere, it must open Gthumb, not F-Spot. (like it must open Totem) No, when you double click on a photo it should open eog which is a viewer. For me, eog and gthumb are quite the same but I've

Re: Shipping fspot instead of gthumb

2006-07-18 Thread Sebastien Bacher
On ven, 2006-07-14 at 17:55 -0700, Corey Burger wrote: Hey all, Time to start yet another discussion. Hopefully this will not go offtopic as badly my last one did. Anyway, I think we should ship fspot in place of gthumb. We already had some discussion about that during the dapper cycle, the

Re: Shipping fspot instead of gthumb

2006-07-18 Thread Sebastien Bacher
On dim, 2006-07-16 at 16:59 +0200, Lionel Dricot wrote: My thought : from a picture viewer, I expect : picture viewer = eog Last time I tried f-spot, it was really a pain because there was no way to simply do that f-spot is a photos manager (browse your photos, class them by categories, fix

Re: Shipping fspot instead of gthumb

2006-07-17 Thread Lionel Dricot
I'm not sure what advantages gthumb has over f-spot besides the mono thing. Well, to make it clear : for me gthumb and eog are like Totem. F-spot is like Rhythmbox. Both are for different use cases. It can be a good idea to ship f-spot by default like we are shipping RB : as an available tool

Re: Shipping fspot instead of gthumb

2006-07-17 Thread Duncan Lithgow
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 17:55 -0700, Corey Burger wrote: ship fspot in place of gthumb. Advantages: 1. Fspot has some nice features, like flickr integration, timelining and tags Has anyone done a feature for feature comparison? 2. Fspot is actively developed, gthumb is dead Almost, some

Re: Shipping fspot instead of gthumb

2006-07-17 Thread Matthew Paul Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Jul 16, 2006, at 8:30 AM, Duncan Lithgow wrote: On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 17:55 -0700, Corey Burger wrote: ... 3. Fspot is likely to become part of gnome (although not by the edgy cycle, as the author has not proposed it So why not wait? ...

Re: Shipping fspot instead of gthumb

2006-07-16 Thread Dean Sas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lionel Dricot wrote: My thought : from a picture viewer, I expect : I wouldn't say gthumb or f-spot is just a picture viewer. Eye of gnome is a picture viewer, f-spot is more of a photo manager (though does basic view and rotate too) and gthumb