[Bug 886428] Re: Bug duplicates files icon in GNOME3 and Unity
** Description changed: Bug duplicates files icon in GNOME3 and Unity. picture http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/210/screenshotat2005094.png/ Thanks you very much. + + test case: + * open the unity dash in the application lens/GS activity view + * see that you only have one file entry ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: nautilus 1:3.2.1-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-13.22-generic 3.0.6 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-13-generic i686 ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4 Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Nov 5 09:47:27 2011 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release i386 (20101007) SourcePackage: nautilus UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-10-21 (14 days ago) ** Also affects: nautilus (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886428 Title: Bug duplicates files icon in GNOME3 and Unity To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/886428/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-desktop mailing list ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
User encountering problems related to private bug report
A user reported a problem on the forum [1] regarding adding a new repository to their software sources using apt-add-repository, and while investigating the error message they were receiving, I came across a bug report [2] that described their problem exactly, but it had been marked as a duplicate of a private bug report [3]. It's my understanding that bug reports are only made private if they contain sensitive information regarding the user's computer or are considered to be a security vulnerability. I was wondering if somebody with the appropriate privellages could check out the private bug and return what informatino they can that could assist the user and, if possible, make it public if there is no real reason for it to be private. Thanks, Chris [1] http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=11443546#post11443546 [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/867580 [3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/837203 -- ubuntu-desktop mailing list ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
Re: disable incomplete language support notification
El 09/11/11 16:59, Carl Karsten escribió: On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Timo Jyrinkitimo.jyri...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/11/9 Carl Karstenc...@personnelware.com: trying to keep the incomplete language support alert from coming up on a fresh install. My guesstimate by looking at the package contents would be that language-selector installs /usr/share/language-support/incomplete-language-support-gnome.note into /var/lib/update-notifier/user.d, after which /usr/share/doc/update-notifier/HOOKS happens. So, without checking further, maybe: rm -f /var/lib/update-notifier/user.d/incomplete* would help? Probably it was Ubiquity (the installer) which writes that file. It does it when any of these packages (see attachment) is not installed. Of course, replace '*-es' packages by the language you chose in Ubiquity :] Seems to work. Thanks. This was a small iteration, like a child's constant are we there yet? So what is the the implication of this? Like if I try to use the box to surf, email or write up a document, what will I be missing? I am not too worried about it, but seems like something I should know. It depends on the packages you are missing from the list I attach. Maybe you miss gimp-help-es or any spelling dictionary. -- Roberto C. Morano Área de Proyectos Emergya Consultoría. Tlf: +34 954 51 75 77 Fax: +34 954 51 64 73 http://www.emergya.es ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ cat /var/lib/ubiquity/langpacks language-pack-en language-pack-gnome-en gimp-help-en hunspell-en-ca hunspell-en-us hyphen-en-us language-pack-en language-pack-gnome-en libreoffice-help-en-gb libreoffice-help-en-us libreoffice-l10n-en-gb libreoffice-l10n-en-za myspell-en-au myspell-en-gb myspell-en-za mythes-en-au mythes-en-us openoffice.org-hyphenation thunderbird-locale-en thunderbird-locale-en-gb thunderbird-locale-en-us wamerican wbritish language-pack-es language-pack-gnome-es gimp-help-es language-pack-es language-pack-gnome-es libreoffice-help-es libreoffice-l10n-es myspell-es openoffice.org-hyphenation thunderbird-locale-es thunderbird-locale-es-ar thunderbird-locale-es-es wspanish -- ubuntu-desktop mailing list ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
Re: User encountering problems related to private bug report
Hi Sebastien, Thanks a lot for your help. Chris On 10 November 2011 13:47, Sebastien Bacher seb...@ubuntu.com wrote: Le 10/11/2011 14:37, Chris Wilson a écrit : I was wondering if somebody with the appropriate privellages could check out the private bug and return what informatino they can that could assist the user and, if possible, make it public if there is no real reason for it to be private. Hi, The bugs with a stacktrace are private by default since they could contain passwords or private datas, seems it's not the case for that one so it has been set public, you should have access if you retry Sebastien Bacher -- ubuntu-desktop mailing list ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.**com ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/**mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-**desktophttps://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop -- ubuntu-desktop mailing list ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
Re: Inter-bugtracker Comment Forwarding [was: Re: Default Music Player in Ubuntu 12.04]
On 10/11/2011 14:51, Bryce Harrington wrote: I used to do that as well, I just found that I was often slow at doing this, and that resulted in actually delaying when the bug got fixed. I still do the initial bug forwarding (which I think is the trickiest part), and I monitor the discussion so if questions aren't getting answered, or if the user gets asked to do something beyond their technical ability I can step in to help. Thanks, I'll try doing that and see how it turns out. But then, with X bugs, users have to face quite technical challenges like gathering stacktraces in gdb, collect gpu dumps, patching and rebuilding their kernel or mesa, git bisection searches, etc. So the hassle of having to register on other bug trackers seems minor in comparison. If someone's going to draw the line at registering in bugzilla, do they have patience to do all the other stuff they're going to get asked to do? That's pretty true. In contrast Banshee bug reporters are usually only requested for some gconf dumps, their sqlite database, or --debug log (usually a matter of running one or two straightforward commands in the terminal), so there isn't that much contrast between getting all that extra material and the hassle of registering on another bug tracker. I do think that every bit helps though, and we should make it as easy as possible for our users to file bugs and follow up with them. We are heavily dependent upon them in order to track-down and solve bugs after all, whereas the user always has the option of flight to an alternative application or distro (or even back to Windows for some of the Windows converts). -- Kind regards, Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-desktop mailing list ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
