Re: [Desktop12.04-Topic] Desktop applications selection

2011-10-05 Thread Jeff Fortin
Regarding pitivi, I know that the gst folks won't be around because UDS
conflicts with the GStreamer Conference...

However, if you wish it, I'd be glad to attend the session through VoIP
(be it skype or empathy if it works these days) so that I may answer any
questions/concerns that may arise.

My goal would not be to nag/coerce you guys, only to be available as a
member of the project that can answer questions regarding its direction
and progress.

Let me know if you'd be interested.
-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: PiTiVi in Ubuntu 11.10 and beyond

2011-09-02 Thread Jeff Fortin
 The pitivi team just got a new version out with quite some nice
 changes in it and said they would do the glade to gtkbuilder
 conversion this cycle, that seems enough material to revisit the
 decision later if the new version is proving to be solid and the
 gtkbuilder switch get done so what people think of keeping pitivi on
 by default until before beta and discuss what we do in a desktop team
 meeting then?


Hi, we're about to release a new version (hopefully this week-end) and I
was wondering if you folks had any special requirements. The last time
we talked with people from Ubuntu we learned that you are very careful
about saving space on the install CD, so to make pitivi fit we migrated
from libglade to gtkbuilder, got rid of the gconf dependency (maybe some
other things too, I forget), and I implemented a soft-dependency manager
so most remainings deps are optional.

We haven't heard from the Ubuntu/Canonical folks at all since I asked on
this mailing list in May. I've been subscribed to this mailing list and
haven't seen further discussions on revisiting the decision to include
pitivi or not... and I couldn't get a hold of you on IRC when I publicly
asked the question a couple of times. We're completely in the dark here.
Can we have a status update with any outstanding issues you may have?

-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: PiTiVi in Ubuntu 11.10 and beyond

2011-09-02 Thread Jeff Fortin
Oh, and for the record, there are two potential packaging tricks you can
do if you are very tight for space:

- The thumbnails for effects in data/pixmaps weigh about 800 kilobytes,
so you could simply omit them from the package and pitivi will display
placeholder icons instead
- You could even strip out the user manual, and normally pitivi would
point the user to the online version if the offline version is
unavailable

Combining those two tricks (or splitting those files into separate
packages), I'd expect the main package size to go down significantly
(down to 340 KB or so?).
-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: PiTiVi in Ubuntu 11.10 and beyond

2011-05-29 Thread Jeff Fortin
Hi there,



 here is a link to a recording of the session, hope that helps
 http://mirrors.tumbleweed.org.za/uds-o/2011-05-13-14-10-desktop-o-default-apps.ogg


Thanks, I listened to the part where pitivi is discussed (from 7 minutes
to 13 minutes), and there isn't that much more than what the session
notes and news sites told me.



 The pitivi team just got a new version out with quite some nice
 changes
 in it and said they would do the glade to gtkbuilder conversion this
 cycle, that seems enough material to revisit the decision later if the
 new version is proving to be solid and the gtkbuilder switch get done
 so
 what people think of keeping pitivi on by default until before beta
 and
 discuss what we do in a desktop team meeting then?


Thanks for your consideration :)

In addition to the various SoC projects going on, we have been
discussing doing a pitivi hackfest at the Desktop Summit in August.
Hopefully by the end of the summer we will have a release that will be
so awesome that user reception should be quite different.
-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


PiTiVi in Ubuntu 11.10 and beyond

2011-05-25 Thread Jeff Fortin
Hello there,

You may know me as one of the main contributors of the pitivi project. I
do bug triaging, testing, community management, documentation writing,
design, website maintenance, coding, etc.

It has come to my attention that the desktop team has decided at UDS to
remove Pitivi from the default selection of apps installed with Ubuntu.
I would like to have a better understanding of what led to this
decision, and hopefully revert it.

As far as I can tell, there is no recording of the session other than a
couple of notes on
http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-o/meeting/desktop-o-default-apps/ , which I
shall quote entirely below for the record:

=== quote ===
Nominations off the CD:
 * PiTiVi (video editing)
  - Apple doesn't have an editor (this should be a motivation to keep
it, in fact)
  - We took off gimp because we don't need an editor for common cases
  - Still a bit crasfhy and not prime-time (2.5 stars in
software-center)
  - package itself is 265kb
  - poorly maintained (hasn't migrated to gtkbuilder)
  - Sounds like we want it off then
== end quote =

Since we were left in the dark and notified only after the fact (through
news sites and the session notes above), we've been wondering what has
been going on. Can I get a better explanation than that? These points
struck me as a bit unconvincing. But before I start, let me first say
that we have a new release coming up by the end of the week. More
details further below.


 We took off gimp because we don't need an editor for common cases

You took off GIMP because, as I remember it, you considered that apps
like Shotwell (F-Spot, back then) would be able to handle the basic
photo correction needs of most users. Unless you're telling me that
Ubuntu now aims to be a distro that only focuses on consuming culture
instead of producing it?
Video editing is becoming increasingly popular with the rise of video
sharing sites such as YouTube, Facebook, Vimeo, and many people now take
culture production into their own hands using dirt-cheap hardware (such
as point-and-shoot photo cameras or cellphones capable of
high-definition recording). Video is now part of the web, and video
production should be part of Ubuntu.


 a bit crashy and not prime-time

Could you be more precise? All applications have bugs. Bugs in video
editors are particularly difficult to troubleshoot, even moreso when 9
users out of 10 reporting bugs in LP don't provide the requested
information and the bug cannot be reproduced.
FWIW, while it certainly isn't perfect, it is certainly good-enough for
users to make videos such as http://www.pitivi.org/?go=showcase . 
Besides, the upcoming release is going to fix a ton of very annoying
bugs, but more details on that further below.


 2.5 stars in the software center

You base your claim of poor user reception upon *ten* user ratings?
When we have thousands of pitivi users? See also:
https://www.ohloh.net/p/pitivi
http://wiki.pitivi.org/wiki/Praise

Please consider:
- Ten ratings is a ridiculously low number for statistical significance.
- There are inherent sampling problems with a voluntary rating system
like yours, where a vocal minority of dissatisfied users will go rate
the app negatively while a silent majority of users are happy with the
app and don't spend time writing reviews all over the place.

Some more insight into how statistics can be misleading:
http://jeff.ecchi.ca/blog/2010/10/17/video-editors-usage-statistics-duty-calls/


 poorly maintained (hasn't migrated to gtkbuilder)

Is that the only thing you base yourself upon to say that an application
is poorly maintained? 
- First, there already is a development branch that tackles the
gtkbuilder migration in pitivi. It's not finished yet, as pitivi is not
a trivial application (and we had a big UI redesign in the past few
months), those things take time and it was not our absolute first
priority, but since there is an active contributor working on it, I can
guarantee that it will be done by Ubuntu 11.10.
- Secondly, there have been over 900 commits since last year. While we
are not the fastest moving project around in the FOSS world, I trust
that we are moving at a reasonable speed given our limited manpower and
the difficulty of the task at hand.

Whatsmore,
- There are *four* students working on pitivi for this Summer of Code,
hopefully tackling all the major projects/missing features that have
been the traditional subject of criticism towards pitivi. I haven't had
the time to blog about this yet because I was busy with studies, LGM,
work, and preparing the release.
- A new release maintainer has been appointed (which should help at
releasing more often). Over the past few weeks, we have been furiously
merging branches and patches, fixing bugs, and testing pitivi thoroughly
to push out a new release out of the door in the coming days. The
announcement to remove pitivi from Ubuntu's default selection came right
in the middle of that.


On that note, I am deeply