> The pitivi team just got a new version out with quite some nice > changes in it and said they would do the glade to gtkbuilder > conversion this cycle, that seems enough material to revisit the > decision later if the new version is proving to be solid and the > gtkbuilder switch get done so what people think of keeping pitivi on > by default until before beta and discuss what we do in a desktop team > meeting then?
Hi, we're about to release a new version (hopefully this week-end) and I was wondering if you folks had any special requirements. The last time we talked with people from Ubuntu we learned that you are very careful about saving space on the install CD, so to make pitivi fit we migrated from libglade to gtkbuilder, got rid of the gconf dependency (maybe some other things too, I forget), and I implemented a soft-dependency manager so most remainings deps are optional. We haven't heard from the Ubuntu/Canonical folks at all since I asked on this mailing list in May. I've been subscribed to this mailing list and haven't seen further discussions on revisiting the decision to include pitivi or not... and I couldn't get a hold of you on IRC when I publicly asked the question a couple of times. We're completely in the dark here. Can we have a status update with any outstanding issues you may have?
-- ubuntu-desktop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
