On 04/12/2011 05:31 AM, Javier Jardón wrote:
On 8 April 2011 00:23, Robert Ancell robert.anc...@canonical.com wrote:
Can we get all our CD applications using GTK3? I'm thinking of Firefox
here, we really don't want to have one or two applications requiring
both packages on the CD..
FYI:
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 16:21 +0200, Krzysztof Klimonda wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 15:03 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
Hi,
The idea was never really dropped but it's not likely it will be an
official focus for the team, contributions to help getting it working
better are welcome
On 8 April 2011 00:23, Robert Ancell robert.anc...@canonical.com wrote:
Can we get all our CD applications using GTK3? I'm thinking of Firefox
here, we really don't want to have one or two applications requiring
both packages on the CD..
FYI: Firefox GTK+3 port:
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 09:12 +1000, Robert Ancell wrote:
On 04/07/2011 05:59 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
Hello all,
kind of obvious topic, but next cycle we'll need to move to GTK3 and
GNOME3. Aside from the obvious update the package versions, I see
the following particular challenges:
Le jeudi 07 avril 2011 à 09:59 +0200, Martin Pitt a écrit :
kind of obvious topic, but next cycle we'll need to move to GTK3 and
GNOME3. Aside from the obvious update the package versions, I see
the following particular challenges:
Hello,
(You stole my topic! ;-)
Joke aside we should do the
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 10:32 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
Le jeudi 07 avril 2011 à 09:59 +0200, Martin Pitt a écrit :
kind of obvious topic, but next cycle we'll need to move to GTK3 and
GNOME3. Aside from the obvious update the package versions, I see
the following particular challenges:
Le jeudi 07 avril 2011 à 11:22 +0200, Krzysztof Klimonda a écrit :
Hmm.. I'd like to propose bringing back the idea of the Stracciatella
session, and making it possible to get both GNOME3 and Gtk+3
applications to look and behave as close as possible to what users get
in other distributions.
Le jeudi 07 avril 2011 à 17:00 +0530, Vishnoo a écrit :
Is Getting GNOME3 really worth it? GTK3 maybe for the parts which are
required for Unity..
Yes, we need to move away from old unmaintained and deprecated
technology for their modern equivalent (gtk2 to gtk3, gconf to dconf,
dbus-glib to
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 15:03 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
Le jeudi 07 avril 2011 à 11:22 +0200, Krzysztof Klimonda a écrit :
Hmm.. I'd like to propose bringing back the idea of the Stracciatella
session, and making it possible to get both GNOME3 and Gtk+3
applications to look and behave as
On 04/07/2011 05:59 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
Hello all,
kind of obvious topic, but next cycle we'll need to move to GTK3 and
GNOME3. Aside from the obvious update the package versions, I see
the following particular challenges:
* Review our patches, and be rather aggressive about removing
On 04/07/2011 05:59 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
Hello all,
kind of obvious topic, but next cycle we'll need to move to GTK3 and
GNOME3. Aside from the obvious update the package versions, I see
the following particular challenges:
* Review our patches, and be rather aggressive about removing
11 matches
Mail list logo
