On 23 April 2012 16:58, Jonas Platte wrote:
> But there are still many people who don't think that those are "the perfect"
> programs. I, for example don't use any of those programs. I like them, but I
> know ones that fit my needs better. So what I would suggest is to improve
> the installation p
Am 23.04.2012, 21:09 Uhr, schrieb Iain Lane :
I would rather like to see the session being focussed on the Ubuntu
weaknesses and how we work toward resolving those rather than on
pointing what doesn't work.
Yes. If there's to be a general session then I think it shouldn't be
about default appl
Hey,
Thanks for the ping. I meant to reply to this but it slipped away.
Here's some relatively uncoordinated thoughts.
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 02:06:11PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le 30/03/2012 12:00, Iain Lane a écrit :
> >Hi there,
> Hey Iain,
>
> Thanks for writing that email, I had th
Le 03/04/2012 14:06, Sebastien Bacher a écrit :
- we should make a public call for changes to discuss early and froze
the list of topics at two weeks before UDS
Hey again,
That discussion didn't get lot of traction, did anyone had an opinion on
what was suggested? If we want discuss topics a
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 08:08:52PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le 03/04/2012 19:33, Bryce Harrington a écrit :
> >An invitation to UDS wouldn't be out of place in this case.
> I'm unsure about that, it's expense (time and money) to invite
> somebody at UDS only for a one hour session, remote p
Le 03/04/2012 19:33, Bryce Harrington a écrit :
An invitation to UDS wouldn't be out of place in this case.
I'm unsure about that, it's expense (time and money) to invite somebody
at UDS only for a one hour session, remote participation should work
fine for those (or written in advance summary)
On 3 April 2012 15:06, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> - what application we might want to drop from the CD, not because of bugs
> or quality but because the world changed and we think that's not useful
> anymore (i.e do we still need something to record audio CDs installed by
> default in a world wher
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 02:06:11PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Thanks for writing that email, I had that on my list as well, making
> sure we don't have another of those "default application selection"
> session like previous UDS ;-)
>
> - we should reach the concerned upstreams at least one
Le 30/03/2012 12:00, Iain Lane a écrit :
Hi there,
Hey Iain,
Thanks for writing that email, I had that on my list as well, making
sure we don't have another of those "default application selection"
session like previous UDS ;-)
Hopefully others have thoughts about how this can work better
Hi there,
This is my proposal for a UDS discussion. I haven't really formulated
any ideas about how this should work, but I think there's something here
to talk about. This mail also isn't as structured as it could be, but I
hope there's something worth discussing in here.
There isn't really a pr
10 matches
Mail list logo
