Re: Call for Natty Feedback!

2011-03-15 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:29:35AM -0700, Jane Doe wrote:
 On my machine that has integrated Intel 845G graphics Natty Alpha 3 defaults 
 to Software Rasterizer and that means 3D acceleration is not available! The 
 Mesa DRI Intel(R) 845G GEM 20090712, 1.3 Mesa 7.6 driver and those previous 
 worked fine with Ubuntu for heavy 3D acceleration...
 

Hi Jane, sorry you've run into problems, and thanks for testing!
However, we're asking that 8xx owners please work directly with upstream
for testing the driver.  At the distro level we're focusing only on 9xx
and newer cards now.  You can file bug reports upstream about 8xx at
bugs.freedesktop.org.

Thanks again, and good luck,
Bryce

-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Call for Natty Feedback!

2011-03-02 Thread frederik.nn...@gmail.com
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 20:58, Jason Warner jason.war...@canonical.comwrote:

 Hello!

 Natty Feature Freeze is here and A3 is upon us! Anyone following along
 closely should see and feel a fairly stable and usable system, complete with
 Unity and classic Gnome.

 I'd like to hear people's thoughts on Unity...and I'd like it to be pretty
 unfiltered and raw. In particular, I'm interested in seeing how people feel
 about:

 * The look and feel

 * Usability

 * Stability (knowing that we are entering a heavy bug fixing time!)

 * Highlights and favorite features

 * Perceived shortcomings and/or wishlist items

 You can reply to this email if your feedback is general/conversational or
 file a bug if you are experiencing a specific issue. Filing a bug with
 'ubuntu-bug unity' command would do the trick and would get seen by the
 appropriate people for specific issues.

 It will be fun to hear what everyone thinks! I look forward to seeing the
 feedback.

 Cheers,
 Jason



people who know my posts are aware that i can get lengthy at times, so i'll
keep it relatively compact today ;)
Thanks to everyone who has already committed reviews to this thread, i
enjoyed reading all of them and i learnt a great deal from seeing other
people's reviews.

1 launcher backlight is generally without purpose (except workspace switcher
and trash)
2 workspace switcher should be on top
3 gnome-www-browser undiscoverable
4 no way to access power preferences
5 no way to access ubuntu one preferences
6 no consistent UI for preferences in general
7 Presence doesn't integrate with Empathy
8 indicators need more spacing
9 panel covers entire top edge, but middle is always blank - wasted display
space
10 home button doesn't look pressed when pressed
11 dash doesn't work
12 in the (currently broken) dash, browsing is called find
13 ALT+F2 is not implemented - big no-no
14 Indicator Menus should float above content transparently (- wingpanel)
15 there is still no distinction between close vs closequit
16 no visual feedback when pointer hits hot areas
17 fade-in / fade out of dock is stuck when pointer touches the top-right
hot-corner, but there's no visual feedback to indicate that i touched any
hot area (see 16)
18 totem doesn't integrate with Sound Menu's playback controls, although it
is default playback app for single audio files - bad
19 dash should appear center stage, not top-left
20 add an appointment should open a tiny dialog, not Evolution Calendar,
maximized
21 three seperate configuration links on the bottom of one indicator menu is
just hilariously confusing (Me Menu)
22 Messaging Menu and Session Menu are inconsistent, in that they have no
Preferences or Settings item on the bottom, when Networking, Power,
Sound, Time/Calendar, MeMenu all do
23 dmedia should be integrated into the dash for browsing/previewing videos
24 shotwell should be integrated into the dash for browsing/previewing
photos
25 some MPRIS  IDO should be integrated into the dash for
browsing/previewing audio (yet, outstanding work so far by Conor)
26 Epiphany-webkit should be default browser, since it integrates with Unity
and neither Chromium nor Firefox do that
27 I'd like more drag-and-drop interaction with window previews, workspaces
and workspace previews
28 Unity/Mutter was better with workspaces: it showcased the open windows
with its equivalent of the compiz Scale plugin

I love the Scale plugin / Window Picker. If docky had that, i'd use default
GNOME until Unity is stable.
Since Docky doesn't have that, i'm going to continue using Unity, even
though it is terribly unstable and far from finished, since this one single
feature already makes it so much more usable than any Desktop Environment i
have used before.

Ubuntu would be better as a whole, if Presence in the Me Menu would actually
control Presence in Empathy.
Since that bug has not been fixed, although it is quite easy to fix (comment
out a few lines of code), the MeMenu, perhaps the most frequently visited
indicator menu for me, doesn't work, and Ubuntu always has a bitter note to
it when i turn it on.

Thanks for the opportunity to review this beautiful DE-in-the-making..
-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Call for Natty Feedback!

2011-03-02 Thread Chris Coulson
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 12:16 +0100, frederik.nn...@gmail.com wrote:

 
 26 Epiphany-webkit should be default browser, since it integrates with
 Unity and neither Chromium nor Firefox do that

Hi,

Well, that is going to improve right after Alpha 3 (see [1]).

Regards
Chris

[1] -
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-4.0.head/revision/805



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Call for Natty Feedback!

2011-03-02 Thread frederik.nn...@gmail.com
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:34, Chris Coulson chrisccoul...@ubuntu.comwrote:

 On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 12:16 +0100, frederik.nn...@gmail.com wrote:

 
  26 Epiphany-webkit should be default browser, since it integrates with
  Unity and neither Chromium nor Firefox do that

 Hi,

 Well, that is going to improve right after Alpha 3 (see [1]).



thanks Chris, that's COOL!

'd like to add.. there's currently no serious replacement for Places, which
worked quite well in Ubuntu/GNOME.
It takes me forever to get to Downloads or to Documents.
-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Call for Natty Feedback!

2011-03-02 Thread frederik.nn...@gmail.com
Hi Vish,

On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 13:00, Vishnoo v...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 12:16 +0100, frederik.nn...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 
  people who know my posts are aware that i can get lengthy at times, so
  i'll keep it relatively compact today ;)

 Thanks! ;p


you're welcome, anytime ;)



  Thanks to everyone who has already committed reviews to this thread, i
  enjoyed reading all of them and i learnt a great deal from seeing
  other people's reviews.

  8 indicators need more spacing

 Contrary to that, folks think current spacing is already too much:
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/indicator-application/+bug/527267


yeah, good point, but that's Appindicators. I really mean Networking, Power,
Sound, Messaging and the ones that follow (Date/Time, Me, Session).
I don't see the reason for NOT having a wingpanel up there, and spacing the
indicators a bit more, to make aiming and visual distinction easier..
-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Call for Natty Feedback!

2011-03-02 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Le mardi 01 mars 2011 à 13:05 -0800, Bryce Harrington a écrit :
 Stabilitywise, I need to use 'unity --reset' still quite a bit, but
 otherwise once it's up and running it seems solid. 

Hello Bryce,

That's an interesting comment, I'm rather curious to know why you need
to do that? What issues do you run into? The unity --reset command is
to reset the compiz configuration, do you tweak yours using ccsm or
similar? Or do you just want restart unity because it crashed or got
confused over time? If you just want to restart unity you just need to
run unity without the reset option.

Cheers, 

Sebastien Bacher



-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Call for Natty Feedback!

2011-03-01 Thread Jason Warner
Hello!

Natty Feature Freeze is here and A3 is upon us! Anyone following along
closely should see and feel a fairly stable and usable system, complete with
Unity and classic Gnome.

I'd like to hear people's thoughts on Unity...and I'd like it to be pretty
unfiltered and raw. In particular, I'm interested in seeing how people feel
about:

* The look and feel

* Usability

* Stability (knowing that we are entering a heavy bug fixing time!)

* Highlights and favorite features

* Perceived shortcomings and/or wishlist items

You can reply to this email if your feedback is general/conversational or
file a bug if you are experiencing a specific issue. Filing a bug with
'ubuntu-bug unity' command would do the trick and would get seen by the
appropriate people for specific issues.

It will be fun to hear what everyone thinks! I look forward to seeing the
feedback.

Cheers,
Jason

PS. For those that like to navigate via keyboard (and who doesn't!), this
should be helpful
http://askubuntu.com/questions/28086/keyboard-shortcuts-in-unity/28087#28087
-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Call for Natty Feedback!

2011-03-01 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 04:18:22PM -0500, Sean McNamara wrote:
 5. Stability has been poor in my experience; I run into X crashes from
 time to time doing fairly mundane stuff that doesn't trigger a crash
 with Gnome2.

Can you provide a bug # (with a full backtrace if possible)?  I'm
putting a priority on following up on xserver segfaults.

(Actually there are no public X crash bugs open against natty at the
moment, so I wonder that what you're seeing is not actually an xserver
segfault.  Regardless, it should be investigated.)

 6. Multi-monitor seems totally broken somehow... on a 1024x768 laptop
 with a 1680x1050 VGA LCD attached, I get no menus and no indication
 that Unity is aware of windows on the large external LCD. And the
 left-side menu doesn't come up at all anymore. It seems like there is
 an empty space above the top of my laptop's screen where my mouse can
 go, but there is nothing up there -- I configured (using the
 xrandr-based Monitors applet) the big monitor to be to the right of
 the laptop LCD.

The first half of that could be unity's handling of multi-head, which I
agree seems like it needs more QA.

The second half, regarding blank spaces where the mouse gets lost, is a
long standing known X.org issue (bug #389519).  (There's been a patch
proposed but it's not upstream yet.)

Bryce

-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Call for Natty Feedback!

2011-03-01 Thread Dylan McCall
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Jason Warner
jason.war...@canonical.com wrote:
 Hello!
 Natty Feature Freeze is here and A3 is upon us! Anyone following along
 closely should see and feel a fairly stable and usable system, complete with
 Unity and classic Gnome.
 I'd like to hear people's thoughts on Unity...and I'd like it to be pretty
 unfiltered and raw. In particular, I'm interested in seeing how people feel
 about:


 * The look and feel

I like that this is somewhat consistent with the look and feel we have
in Maverick, which should really help with upgrades. As far as
prettiness, I don't know if I am looking at the final art assets or if
a big change is still coming; that makes it a little difficult to
comment.
I think it's fairly pretty in general, though the dash obviously is
still a WIP in that regard. I'm a little bothered by our half title
bar / half top panel. We can end up with some really ugly visuals with
maximised windows that are completely inconsistent with unmaximized
windows. (Especially with themes that don't style the panel like a
title bar, which is most themes because styling the panel like a title
bar is a weird thing to do). The merging itself is quite natural, but
the visuals hurt it for me.
Alas, that one is a tough nut to crack so I can probably live with it
for now, but is there any ongoing work in that direction?

The glowy backgrounds on icons are interesting. Has anyone else
noticed a strange tendency towards a really ugly, greenish yellow? I
think that particular design is actually a little tired; everyone has
been doing it since Windows 7 did it. (And Windows 7 still does the
best job with it).


 * Usability

There are always little bugs to report, but it's coming along.

I LOVE the stuff with holding Super to launch things in the panel,
especially how that works with Places. A visual representation of the
common keyboard shortcuts is something I have wanted for a long time.

The arrows in the launcher! I don't think we are doing our users a
favour when their applications start looking like pin-cushions. Lots
of things are being presented by that one idea.

I had a bit of muttering here about the widgets in the dash, but I
filed a bug report on the text field
(http://launchpad.net/bugs/727295). These have really been changing a
lot so I'm sure it will be quite a bit better soon :)

Configuration stuff is really weird to get to now. (Though it can be a
little easier depending on how the search stuff looks in the end). I
know we can't have Gnome 3's Control Centre yet (*sad face*), but
maybe there could be a nice launcher that brings up the Application
place pointing at the System category. That could also smooth the
upgrade to 11.10, where I assume we will want to stick the Control
Centre somewhere ;)


 * Stability (knowing that we are entering a heavy bug fixing time!)

It's seems to be getting there with the latest update. I have my
reservations about the global menu being implemented over dbus — it
sounds like a weird, roundabout route for that window-specific data to
take — but it is being much more reliable lately so I guess I don't
need to worry about that hitting actual users.


 * Highlights and favorite features

Dragging a file to the launcher is really cool. We've had the ability
to drag and drop to applications for a long time and this actually
makes it useful. It's neat what a little thing like that can do, and
it's wonderful when such things can plug in to existing standards so
they already work to their fullest.
This is particularly useful with an open application. I frequently
want to drag and drop a file to an entry in the window list, and
finally I can!


 * Perceived shortcomings and/or wishlist items

That dash feels a little netbook-ish. Some of the strings on it feel
awkward — very specific and task-oriented. To me, that projects a
feeling of the system itself being limited. Lots of comments people
write about the dash seem to imply the same thing. This probably has a
different effect on simpler users who really do want to just “browse
the web,” “view photos,” “check email” and “listen to music,” but I
wonder if this could use less loaded descriptions, and maybe just
application names to communicate that these are regular application
launchers. (Of course, I'm assuming by the “Shortcuts” heading that
the eventual goal is for these to be user-configured).

Finally, and I know I already filed a bug report on this but it's my
favourite wishlist item: Quit does not actually quit applications; it
closes windows and hopes that means quitting applications. Given
Ayatana has been working on that relationship, this feels distinctly
unhappy to me. For example, music players don't HAVE Quit anymore; you
close the player's main window, and the application stays running if
it needs to.
Bamf does pretty well, but I think Unity is trying to present a
knowledge of applications (as opposed to windows) that it simply does
not have at the moment, and cannot have 

Re: Call for Natty Feedback!

2011-03-01 Thread Marc Deslauriers
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 06:28 +1030, Jason Warner wrote:
 I'd like to hear people's thoughts on Unity...and I'd like it to be
 pretty unfiltered and raw. In particular, I'm interested in seeing how
 people feel about:

So, now that the binary nVidia driver is working in Natty, I was able to
try Unity out. I've been playing with it for about 45 minutes now, and
here are my observations:

I like the overall look of things. The Unity launcher on the left is
neat. Not having menus in applications is weird at first glance,
especially when you don't see them by default in the top bar. I thought
the menus were broken until I put my mouse at the top of the screen and
they appeared. Discoverability is a little odd until you know about it,
and then it's fine. Having the menu appear half way over the name of the
applications looks bad though. It kind of looks like it's broken.

I haven't discovered where my applications are yet. I clicked on the big
button on the top left hand corner, which popped up a nice looking
dialog. Unfortunately the search bar doesn't seem to find anything, and
the find icons don't do anything when I click on them. I assume this is
unfinished, and is a known issue so I won't file a bug unless otherwise
told to. Since that wasn't working, I tried hitting Alt-F2 to start an
application, but that doesn't seem to work either. For now, I'll just
start my apps using the command line.

So, starting a terminal, the first thing I notice is it puts the
terminal underneath the launcher, and the launcher goes away. The only
way I've figured to get the launcher back is to move the terminal away
from the edge of the screen. This is kind of irritating. New windows
shouldn't get placed underneath the launcher, and there has to be some
way of getting the launcher back without moving stuff out of the way.

Second thing I notice, is there doesn't seem to be a way to start an
application more than once. How do I open more than one terminal? How do
I open more than one text editor? I seriously hope this will be
possible. I can understand that certain applications, such as Evolution,
should only be started once, but surely the terminal and the text editor
are exceptions to this. Especially when using multiple workspaces.

I am a heavy workspace user, and have been for years. Using multiple
workspaces is the way I deal with doing more than one task at a time. A
workspace for email and communications, a workspace for something I'm
working on, a workspace for another task, etc. I want to check something
out? Switch to an unused workspace and open a new browser. I used to
think only power-users used workspaces, but to my surprise, family
members who I've converted to Ubuntu have discovered workspaces by
themselves and use them regularly.

Unfortunately, workspaces are hard to use under Natty. The workspace
switcher icon doesn't have previews, so it's hard to figure out where my
stuff is. Clicking on the icon reveals a seasickness-inducing animation
of all my workspaces entering the screen. But, I can't select any. At
least, I _though_ I couldn't select any, until I finally noticed that I
need to click _once_ on the icon, and then _double-click_ on the window
I want to select.

Switching between windows in a current workspace is hard also, as the
launcher displays arrows beside applications that reside on different
workspaces. When I click on the Firefox launcher that has an arrow, am I
bringing up a firefox from this task, or will the launcher catapult me
into another workspace altogether and try and make me guess where I've
ended up?

In all, I really like Unity and am looking forward to the bugs and
usability issues to be cleared up.

Marc.





-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Call for Natty Feedback!

2011-03-01 Thread Christopher James Halse Rogers
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 13:51 -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
 On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 04:18:22PM -0500, Sean McNamara wrote:
  5. Stability has been poor in my experience; I run into X crashes from
  time to time doing fairly mundane stuff that doesn't trigger a crash
  with Gnome2.
 
 Can you provide a bug # (with a full backtrace if possible)?  I'm
 putting a priority on following up on xserver segfaults.
 
 (Actually there are no public X crash bugs open against natty at the
 moment, so I wonder that what you're seeing is not actually an xserver
 segfault.  Regardless, it should be investigated.)
 
  6. Multi-monitor seems totally broken somehow... on a 1024x768 laptop
  with a 1680x1050 VGA LCD attached, I get no menus and no indication
  that Unity is aware of windows on the large external LCD. And the
  left-side menu doesn't come up at all anymore. It seems like there is
  an empty space above the top of my laptop's screen where my mouse can
  go, but there is nothing up there -- I configured (using the
  xrandr-based Monitors applet) the big monitor to be to the right of
  the laptop LCD.
 
 The first half of that could be unity's handling of multi-head, which I
 agree seems like it needs more QA.
 
 The second half, regarding blank spaces where the mouse gets lost, is a
 long standing known X.org issue (bug #389519).  (There's been a patch
 proposed but it's not upstream yet.)

There's a patch series for this and pointer barriers (which Unity might
want to use, too, for the BDB + multihead) on the xorg-devel mailing
list.  The crtc-clamping works and if we really wanted it the patch is
relatively safe and could be FFe'd.  The pointer-barriers need protocol
changes, and I'd be hesitant to include them before the protocol has
been finalised.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop