Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha scritto:
I don't think this is justified. If you don't like it, you can edit the menus
with alacarte and remove that entry. But the fact that you don't use it
doesn't
mean we should remove it (we could if there was a better reason, but I don't
think that is one)
Matthew East ha scritto:
Hi,
I don't think it is particularly appropriate to assert that this
change is *unjustified* with that emphasis. That's just your opinion.
I take care of Gnome-bt in both Debian and Ubuntu and looking the
removal of its desktop entry from a maintainer-view looks
Flávio Martins ha scritto:
- There is however the transmission-cli package which provides a console
client.
I guess this is not really needed... we have some other packages
available to be used from the command line. (ctorrent for instance)
Do you know if anybody is looking at the
Jo-Erlend Schinstad ha scritto:
One question I can't find an answer to in this discussion, is why we
want to have gnome-btdownload.
Maybe because it fits fine into the GNOME Desktop? Maybe because it's
easy and simple to use, it doesn't have tons of different configurations
and does the
Jo-Erlend Schinstad ha scritto:
I then asked in #Ubuntu-OffTopic how people felt about
replacing gnone-btdownload, and the response was a unanimous yes.
Not nice to hear from a Gnome-bt's maintainer but anyway some of the
points you reported above can be considered fair enough.
Andrea
