Re: third test rebuild of precise pangolin

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Colin Watson wrote: [...] > evolution-exchange (i386, amd64, armhf): > evolution-indicator (i386, amd64, armhf): >  Bug indicates that this was fixed in evolution, so we should be able >  to retry shortly. Indeed, I did a change in evolution a while ago and didn't

Re: third test rebuild of precise pangolin

On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 10:29:57AM -0400, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Colin Watson wrote: > > heartbeat (i386, amd64, armhf): > >  Needs to move to single includes rather than . > > This one seems to be inherited from cluster-glue, which is already > fixed.

Re: third test rebuild of precise pangolin

Micah Gersten [2012-04-03 11:41 -0500]: > Won't reverting the single header include just cause other glib related > include failures for moving headers? I guess it might possibly be less > than the current number though. No, glib has always had a similar include structure as it has today. The pat

Minutes from the Ubuntu Kernel Team meeting, 2012-04-03

= Meeting Minutes = [[http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2012/04/03/%23ubuntu-meeting.txt|IRC Log of the meeting.]] [[http://voices.canonical.com/kernelteam|Meeting minutes.]] == Agenda == [[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting#Tues, 03 Apr, 2012|20120403 Meeting Agenda]] === ARM Status === P

Re: third test rebuild of precise pangolin

On 04/03/2012 10:12 AM, Martin Pitt wrote: > Colin Watson [2012-04-03 16:08 +0200]: >> aisleriot (i386, amd64, armhf): >> libical (i386, armhf): > These two are in progress in the desktop team ATM. > >> heartbeat (i386, amd64, armhf): >> Needs to move to single includes rather than . > Actually,

Re: third test rebuild of precise pangolin

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 05:12:41PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: >> Colin Watson [2012-04-03 16:08 +0200]: >> > heartbeat (i386, amd64, armhf): >> >   Needs to move to single includes rather than . >> >> Actually, we'll fix our "revert single inc

Re: third test rebuild of precise pangolin

On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 05:12:41PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > Colin Watson [2012-04-03 16:08 +0200]: > > heartbeat (i386, amd64, armhf): > > Needs to move to single includes rather than . > > Actually, we'll fix our "revert single include requirement" patch > harder in glib2.0, to also avoid t

Re: third test rebuild of precise pangolin

On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 08:45:14PM +0530, Rohan Garg wrote: > Hi > > telepathy-qt4 (i386): > >  "FAIL!  : TestStreamedMediaChan::testOutgoingCallBusy() Compared > >  values are not the same".  Don't ask me why. > > Would it be possible for someone to retry telepathy-qt4 ? I've > compiled it locall

Re: First Ubuntu Algorithm Classes

W dniu 3 kwietnia 2012 13:13 użytkownik bdfhjk napisał: > I am pleased to announce the first classes about usage of algorithms in > programming. > > It will be held on* April 13 at 19:00 UTC +2* [Check time in your > town[1]

Re: third test rebuild of precise pangolin

On 03/04/2012, Colin Watson wrote: > > bzr (armhf): > Test failure on > > bzrlib.tests.per_interrepository.test_fetch.TestInterRepository.test_fetch_parent_inventories_at_stacking_boundary_smart_old, > some smart server error that's beyond me to debug. Could probably use > the attention of

Re: third test rebuild of precise pangolin

Hi > telepathy-qt4 (i386): >  "FAIL!  : TestStreamedMediaChan::testOutgoingCallBusy() Compared >  values are not the same".  Don't ask me why. > Would it be possible for someone to retry telepathy-qt4 ? I've compiled it locally with the new telepathy-glib ( 0.17.7 ) and the tests pass just fine.

Re: third test rebuild of precise pangolin

Colin Watson [2012-04-03 16:08 +0200]: > aisleriot (i386, amd64, armhf): > libical (i386, armhf): These two are in progress in the desktop team ATM. > heartbeat (i386, amd64, armhf): > Needs to move to single includes rather than . Actually, we'll fix our "revert single include requirement" p

Re: third test rebuild of precise pangolin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 03/04/12 16:08, schrieb Colin Watson: > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 10:15:38AM -0500, Kate Stewart wrote: >> Given the rather large number of packages in main showing up on the >> list[1], and where we are in the release cycle, if you could take a >> l

Re: third test rebuild of precise pangolin

On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 03:24:05PM +0100, Martin Packman wrote: > On 03/04/2012, Colin Watson wrote: > > bzr (armhf): > > Test failure on > > > > bzrlib.tests.per_interrepository.test_fetch.TestInterRepository.test_fetch_parent_inventories_at_stacking_boundary_smart_old, > > some smart server

Re: third test rebuild of precise pangolin

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Colin Watson wrote: > heartbeat (i386, amd64, armhf): >  Needs to move to single includes rather than . This one seems to be inherited from cluster-glue, which is already fixed. A rebuild should do it. In file included from /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gtypes.h:36

Re: third test rebuild of precise pangolin

On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 10:15:38AM -0500, Kate Stewart wrote: >Given the rather large number of packages in main showing up on the > list[1], and where we are in the release cycle, if you could take a > look a the list, and please help resolve those rebuild ftbfs failures > that you're able t

Re: third test rebuild of precise pangolin

On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 10:15:38AM -0500, Kate Stewart wrote: >Given the rather large number of packages in main showing up on the > list[1], and where we are in the release cycle, if you could take a > look a the list, and please help resolve those rebuild ftbfs failures > that you're able t

First Ubuntu Algorithm Classes

I am pleased to announce the first classes about usage of algorithms in programming. It will be held on* April 13 at 19:00 UTC +2* [Check time in your town[1]]. I decided to say some words about