Re: Ubuntu Studio precise pangolin 12.04.1 RCs on ISO tracker

2012-08-23 Thread Mike Holstein
any and all testing is greatly appreciated, but actually, there are test cases that *must* be done in order for our iso's to be allowed to be released. these test cases are outlined here... http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/230/builds/21416/testcases it can be challenging to drill

Re: Unity Going Forward

2012-08-23 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:21:18AM +0930, Jason Warner wrote: [2] - We know Unity is showing some graphical corruption inside a VM. Work to correct this has been done but not landed yet. Do you have a bug reference for this? I'm unable to work on ubiquity in KVM right now, which is my normal

Re: Unity Going Forward

2012-08-23 Thread Martin Pitt
Colin Watson [2012-08-23 13:12 +0100]: On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:21:18AM +0930, Jason Warner wrote: [2] - We know Unity is showing some graphical corruption inside a VM. Work to correct this has been done but not landed yet. Do you have a bug reference for this? I'm unable to work on

Re: Unity Going Forward

2012-08-23 Thread Colin Law
On 20 August 2012 19:20, Colin Law clan...@googlemail.com wrote: On 20 August 2012 00:30, Jason Warner jason.war...@canonical.com wrote: Hi Colin - On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Colin Law clan...@googlemail.com wrote: On 17 August 2012 01:51, Jason Warner jason.war...@canonical.com wrote:

Re: Using biosdevname by default?

2012-08-23 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 01:50:19AM +, Colin Watson wrote: 2) At UDS, consider defaulting to biosdevname=1 for 12.10. Presumably by that point we would have reasonably substantial experience with it as a result of 1). biosdevname is now enabled by default on 12.10 alternate/server

Re: Using biosdevname by default?

2012-08-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 04:23:53PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 01:50:19AM +, Colin Watson wrote: 2) At UDS, consider defaulting to biosdevname=1 for 12.10. Presumably by that point we would have reasonably substantial experience with it as a result of

Quantal Feature Freeze - now in effect.

2012-08-23 Thread Kate Stewart
Hello Ubuntu Developers, 2100 UTC has now passed and we are in Feature Freeze[1] for Quantal. Many thank yous to those developers who got their tested work in on time! The focus from here until release is on fixing bugs and polishing. Our next upcoming milestone release[2] is Beta 1 on

Update the 'tilda' package

2012-08-23 Thread Lanoxx
Hi, the tilda package in Ubuntu has not been updated since 2009 and even in quantal the current packages are still from 2009. However the tilda source already contains some updates for a long time (for example to move the config files to an xdg folder). The

Re: The place of the Ubuntu Software Center regarding Steam, Desura and others

2012-08-23 Thread Matthew Paul Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nicolas Michel wrote on 21/08/12 22:52: ... So I thought the best I would want as a user is to search for everything I want to install on my desktop from the Ubuntu Software Center. Although I'm not aware of the future plans for the

Re: Update the 'tilda' package

2012-08-23 Thread Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Lanoxx lan...@gmx.net wrote: the tilda package in Ubuntu has not been updated since 2009 and even in quantal the current packages are still from 2009. However the tilda source already contains some updates for a long time (for example to move the config files

Re: Update the 'tilda' package

2012-08-23 Thread Lanoxx
The official repository is now the one on github [3], I contacted Tristan Slaughter a few month ago and asked him to pull my changes around that time I also asked on this mailing list that launchpad should synch from github instead of sourceforge. Also the current code is not tagged it is

LVM and Thin Provisioning

2012-08-23 Thread John Moser
Gents, Do you think in the future Ubuntu would benefit from an LVM with thin provisioning default whole-disk layout? At the moment thin provisioning is not considered stable, and so it would be inappropriate. I believe that once LVM thin provisioning is stable, it would be worthwhile for Ubuntu

Re: LVM and Thin Provisioning

2012-08-23 Thread Nicolas Michel
Hello, I didn't know that thin provinsioning was a feature of LVM! Good to know it :) Said that, isn't the future will BTRFS? No need of LVM anymore then since all of the features will be packages in the filesystem. Nicolas 2012/8/23 John Moser john.r.mo...@gmail.com Gents, Do you think in

Re: Update the 'tilda' package

2012-08-23 Thread Timothy Arceri
; charset=us-ascii An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/attachments/20120823/1a93a712/attachment-0001.html This is happening on this list as well as the GTK list. From: ubuntu-devel-discuss-requ