On 09.01.2011 15:12, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
1171 packages failed to build, with a lot of linking-related failures.
http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/ubuntu_ftbfs.cgi
please ignore the test results for the packages in main. More recent results are
tracked in
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com wrote:
So how long do you wait? Until after these issues are all fixed in Debian?
Surely that is the least amount of work, but do we want to wait that long? If
changes are made in Debian and Ubuntu starts to merge these changes,
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Evan Broder e...@ebroder.net wrote:
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com wrote:
Those two data points, combined, leads me to believe that there are
400+ packages that are failing to build in Natty. Because of the
Debian freeze, we
On 12/04/2010 01:53 PM, Scott Howard wrote:
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Evan Broder e...@ebroder.net wrote:
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com wrote:
Those two data points, combined, leads me to believe that there are
400+ packages that are failing to build
On Dec 03, 2010, at 08:23 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Long time no see... And 1474 packages failed to build!
http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/ubuntu_ftbfs.cgi
Thanks. I was making some progress on the graphviz failure before my stint as
patch pilot yesterday. Hopefully I'll have a branch to fix
On Dec 03, 2010, at 08:23 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Long time no see... And 1474 packages failed to build!
There are lots of:
[LD_ERROR] libfoo.so: could not read symbols: Invalid operation
due to binutils-gold not doing indirect linking. Is there an organized
effort to address them? They all
On 03.12.2010 18:11, Scott Howard wrote:
On Dec 03, 2010, at 08:23 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Long time no see... And 1474 packages failed to build!
There are lots of:
[LD_ERROR] libfoo.so: could not read symbols: Invalid operation
due to binutils-gold not doing indirect linking. Is there
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com wrote:
see http://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOLinking
Thanks, I'm familiar with the Debian effort and agree this change is a
good thing. My question is more on the Ubuntu side: there are ~400
packages (or more) that would require
On 03.12.2010 19:15, Scott Howard wrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Matthias Klosed...@ubuntu.com wrote:
see http://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOLinking
Thanks, I'm familiar with the Debian effort and agree this change is a
good thing. My question is more on the Ubuntu side: there are
Long time no see... And 1474 packages failed to build!
http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/ubuntu_ftbfs.cgi
- Lucas
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
10 matches
Mail list logo
