I decided to try UDD again for a new upstream version that was just released.
I was following the documentation here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributedDevelopment/Documentation/NewUpstreamVersion
I got to this step:
bzr merge-upstream --version 1.2 http://example.org/releases/foo-1.2.tar.gz
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 15:00 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I decided to try UDD again for a new upstream version that was just released.
I was following the documentation here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributedDevelopment/Documentation/NewUpstreamVersion
I got to this step:
bzr
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 03:00:23 PM Scott Kitterman wrote:
I decided to try UDD again for a new upstream version that was just
released.
I was following the documentation here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributedDevelopment/Documentation/NewUpstreamVer
sion
I got to this step:
On Apr 14, 2011, at 03:29 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
the bzr-builddeb in natty can use the watch file. If you have a watch
file it will use the watch file to download the upstream release.
The --version argument is also optional if you have a watch file; it
will default to the latest
On Apr 14, 2011, at 03:51 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
I'll do that. The wiki is semi-obsolete. As soon as the new Ubuntu packaging
guide gets a URL, I'll be removing the wiki pages and pointing to it (which
contains the latest content, and which I'll also update).
Looks like Jelmer already did
On 04/11/2011 11:43 AM, Martin Pool wrote:
Robert pointed out
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-desktop/2011-April/002940.html,
about moving to 'normal mode' of bzr-builddeb, in which the entire
tree is versioned.
- It is possible to screw up the branches so that bzr merge-package
Le lundi 11 avril 2011 à 12:45 +1000, Robert Ancell a écrit :
I don't know exactly what I've broken, but I think it is when I do a
debcommit without the -r. I stuffed up the gvfs branch some time
ago,
Hi,
The gvfs broken updated didn't have any source change in its commit it
just seemed
On Apr 11, 2011, at 10:42 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
We could do that. I actually usually do bzr bd -S first, and only
debcommit -r once that was successful, but I can just ignore the
warning :)
I usually do things this way too.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
On 04/14/2011 02:00 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I decided to try UDD again for a new upstream version that was just released.
I was following the documentation here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributedDevelopment/Documentation/NewUpstreamVersion
I got to this step:
bzr merge-upstream
= Syncing Ubuntu-Studio mirror =
Thu Apr 14 06:57:07 UTC 2011
= Building britney =
Thu Apr 14 06:59:32 UTC 2011
make: Entering directory `/srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/britney/update_out'
make: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make: Leaving directory
= Syncing Ubuntu-Studio mirror =
Thu Apr 14 08:29:55 UTC 2011
= Building britney =
Thu Apr 14 08:32:17 UTC 2011
make: Entering directory `/srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/britney/update_out'
make: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make: Leaving directory
You are receiving this email because you have been subscribed to the
following test case:
Ubuntu Studio Alternate amd64 [20110414.3]:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/info/5504
Install (auto-resize): http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/result/5504/226
Install (entire disk with encryption):
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Jorge G. Mare jorge.g.m...@gmail.comwrote:
Howdy,
I did a few more tweaks here and there, plus added and themed user
profiles.
Here are a few mandatory screenshots:
News post
This is fabulous, great job!
Curious though, what are your plans for the header? I feel like we've had
some Ubuntu Studio logo work done before, and we could possibly resurrect
that unless you have the logo under control.
Again, this is awesome.
-luis
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Scott
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Louie Queral louiethecu...@gmail.com wrote:
This is fabulous, great job!
Curious though, what are your plans for the header? I feel like we've had
some Ubuntu Studio logo work done before, and we could possibly resurrect
that unless you have the logo under
could we upload the logo here for some context?
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 1:11 PM, C K coryis...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Louie Queral louiethecu...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is fabulous, great job!
Curious though, what are your plans for the header? I feel like we've
Howdy,
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Louie Queral louiethecu...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is fabulous, great job!
Curious though, what are your plans for the header? I feel like we've had
some Ubuntu Studio logo work done before, and we could possibly resurrect
that unless you have the
News post
https://picasaweb.google.com/jorge.g.mare/UbuntuStudioArtwork#5595278554459506242
User profile
https://picasaweb.google.com/jorge.g.mare/UbuntuStudioArtwork#5595278554875022562
Blog post
https://picasaweb.google.com/jorge.g.mare/UbuntuStudioArtwork#5595284881897234786
Jorge
Jorge
Hi,
Every Thursday at 15:00 UTC.
We'll be having the usual IRC meeting on #ubuntu-meeting, on
Thursday 2011-04-14 at 15:00 UTC.
The meeting agenda is available here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MobileTeam/Meeting/2011/20110414
The meeting history page with links to prior meetings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Johansen wrote on 11/04/11 01:00:
On 04/09/2011 12:21 AM, Allison Randal wrote:
On 04/07/2011 11:52 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
If this is a major issue, then frankly I'd rather just remove the
whitelist and allow all old-style systray
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 09:13:39 AM Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
John Johansen wrote on 11/04/11 01:00:
On 04/09/2011 12:21 AM, Allison Randal wrote:
On 04/07/2011 11:52 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
If this is a major issue, then frankly I'd rather just remove the
whitelist and allow all
Scott Kitterman [2011-04-14 9:49 -0400]:
Unless it's a package developed specifically for Ubuntu, it's really not a
bug
in the package from an upstream perspective.
To the contrary. GtkStatusIcon is an official API from GTK, so people
have every right to use it; we can hardly claim that
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com wrote:
Unless it's a package developed specifically for Ubuntu, it's really not a bug
in the package from an upstream perspective. Some upstreams will choose to
support Ubuntu specific requirements and others won't. For
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 01:39:43 PM Ted Gould wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 09:49 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Unless it's a package developed specifically for Ubuntu, it's really not
a bug in the package from an upstream perspective. Some upstreams will
choose to support Ubuntu
Am Donnerstag, den 14.04.2011, 12:39 -0500 schrieb Ted Gould:
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 09:49 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Unless it's a package developed specifically for Ubuntu, it's really not a
bug
in the package from an upstream perspective. Some upstreams will choose to
support
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 20:47 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 14.04.2011, 12:39 -0500 schrieb Ted Gould:
I hope that one day we can get to the point of having UI requirements on
applications within the Ubuntu process similar to the security
requirements that exist with an MIR
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 03:17:47 PM Ted Gould wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 20:47 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 14.04.2011, 12:39 -0500 schrieb Ted Gould:
I hope that one day we can get to the point of having UI requirements
on applications within the Ubuntu process
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Mackenzie Morgan maco...@gmail.com wrote:
I saw a complaint about Dropbox Keepass yesterday
http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/04/13/%23ubuntu+1.html#t19:28
I haven't tried Skype, but seeing as it's proprietary (Dropbox too, I
think?) I doubt they'd modify to fit
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:41:56AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Kees Cook wrote:
/etc/service/status.d
And if one exists for the job name, run it, otherwise just run the
upstart status and provide an LSB compatible return code.
This would also allow for the post-start stanza to call
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:41:22PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 02:17:47PM -0500, Ted Gould wrote:
But, I'd also love to see the requirements for Universe be something
higher than just the DFSG. For instance, I believe Debian requires
everything in /usr/bin to have a man
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Kees Cook k...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:41:56AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Kees Cook wrote:
/etc/service/status.d
And if one exists for the job name, run it, otherwise just run the
upstart status and provide an LSB compatible return
Excerpts from Dustin Kirkland's message of Thu Apr 14 13:37:45 -0700 2011:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Kees Cook k...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:41:56AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Kees Cook wrote:
/etc/service/status.d
And if one exists for the job name, run
Fellow Ubuntu Triagers!
This week, there is a special Bonus Bug Day.
I announce *drum roll please* - Natty ISO Testing Bugs !
* 100 New bugs need a hug
* 51 Incomplete bugs need a status check
* 100 Confirmed bugs need a review
Natty Beta 2 candidates have been tested, many bugs have been
The Ubuntu team is pleased to announce the release of Ubuntu 11.04 Beta
2.
Codenamed Natty Narwhal, 11.04 continues Ubuntu's proud tradition of
integrating the latest and greatest open source technologies into a
high-quality, easy-to-use Linux distribution. The team has been hard at
work
Hi,considering your patience I would like to express that i am a newbee
in LINUX and currently using UBUNTU10.10.I am very much interested in
contributing to GRUB,i want to make the boot-option screen to be
graphical like it is in SUSE.I have a good knowledge of C and JAVA.As i
am beginner i
Hi Micah,
As I said, there is many other software that some one could update
safely not just Firefox 4. It's not a matter of one or two Apps, please
read the Draft
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/damascene/Decentralized%20Ubuntu%20Repository
??? 13 ?? 2011 08:05, ??? Micah Gersten:
There's a bit of discussion going on at the moment regarding the tightening
of scheduled releases of Firefox and their inclusion in Fedora.
I was curious as to how the Ubuntu Developers felt about it and whether they
feel they will be able to keep up with an increased Firefox release schedule
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 20:27 +1000, Chris Jones wrote:
There’s a bit of discussion going on at the moment regarding the
tightening of scheduled releases of Firefox and their inclusion in
Fedora.
I was curious as to how the Ubuntu Developers felt about it and
whether they feel they will
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:03:41 +0100
From: Chris Coulson chrisccoul...@ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: Ubuntu and future Firefox update schedule
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 20:27 +1000, Chris Jones wrote:
There?s a bit of discussion going on at the moment regarding the
tightening of scheduled releases of
I'm sure the closer the Natty release date gets the more requests such
as this you get, but is there any chance that the amanda client and
server packages will be brought up to date by then?
Update to ver 3.2.2.
Thanks,
Rob
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 10:26:30 PM Robert Simmons wrote:
I'm sure the closer the Natty release date gets the more requests such
as this you get, but is there any chance that the amanda client and
server packages will be brought up to date by then?
Update to ver 3.2.2.
Thanks,
Rob
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 10:26:30 PM Robert Simmons wrote:
I'm sure the closer the Natty release date gets the more requests such
as this you get, but is there any chance that the amanda client and
server packages
42 matches
Mail list logo
