Ubuntu Studio Contributors meeting on 2011-08-07 17:00 UTC - Reminder

2011-08-04 Thread Janne Jokitalo
Hi all! It's time for the montly Ubuntu Studio Contributors meeting again, this Sunday at 17:00 UTC, check this link to find the meeting time in your timezone: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Ubuntu+Studio+Contributor+Meetingiso=20110807T17 . The meeting will be held on

ARM IRC Meeting Reminder

2011-08-04 Thread Michael Casadevall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Every Thursday at 15:00 UTC. We'll be having the usual IRC meeting on #ubuntu-meeting, on Thursday 2011-08-04 at 15:00 UTC. The meeting agenda is available here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MobileTeam/Meeting/2011/20110804 The meeting

Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Oliver Grawert
hi, Am Mittwoch, den 03.08.2011, 17:05 -0400 schrieb Scott Kitterman: Much of this entire discussion was started by Canonical employees wanting special case treatment for upstream work sponsored by Canonical. this is totally untrue if i read the log [1] from the meeting that caused you to

Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, August 04, 2011 06:01:01 AM Oliver Grawert wrote: hi, Am Mittwoch, den 03.08.2011, 17:05 -0400 schrieb Scott Kitterman: Much of this entire discussion was started by Canonical employees wanting special case treatment for upstream work sponsored by Canonical. this is totally

Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote: hi, Am Mittwoch, den 03.08.2011, 17:05 -0400 schrieb Scott Kitterman: Much of this entire discussion was started by Canonical employees wanting special case treatment for upstream work sponsored by Canonical. this is

Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote: Am 04.08.2011 15:32 schrieb Mackenzie Morgan maco...@gmail.com: On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote: hi, Am Mittwoch, den 03.08.2011, 17:05 -0400 schrieb Scott Kitterman: Much of

Re: SRUs for typo fixes in descriptions

2011-08-04 Thread Brian Murray
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 02:46:06PM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Micah Gersten's message of Wed Aug 03 12:55:09 -0700 2011: So, there are a couple merge proposals right now for control file description typo fixes for natty:

Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Oliver Grawert
hi, Am Donnerstag, den 04.08.2011, 10:12 -0400 schrieb Mackenzie Morgan: I'd actually take Kate off that list. why ? she expressed her surprise about LP contributions not counting as well in tuesdays meeting. the same apparently made jorge be a bad canonical guy, why isnt this the case for kate

Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote: hi, Am Donnerstag, den 04.08.2011, 10:12 -0400 schrieb Mackenzie Morgan: More like: Ugh, these two getting upset about the people they manage being rejected. Again. How predictable! *eye roll* and what forbids them from

Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Marc Cluet
Hi maco, On 4 Aug 2011, at 15:12, Mackenzie Morgan wrote: On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote: Am 04.08.2011 15:32 schrieb Mackenzie Morgan maco...@gmail.com: On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote: hi, Am Mittwoch, den

Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Oliver Grawert
hi, Am Donnerstag, den 04.08.2011, 10:26 -0400 schrieb Mackenzie Morgan: If there's an anti-Canonical bias, I still don't see it, and the discussion we have since yesterday doesnt strike you as possibly being related to anti canonical bias ? i can just say that i clearly see it and its scary

Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Jeremy Bicha jer...@bicha.net wrote: An issue is that applicants are not aware that email is an option and it's unclear whether the board considers it to be as valid an option as the IRC meeting.

Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 04.08.2011, 10:26 -0400 schrieb Mackenzie Morgan:  If there's an anti-Canonical bias, I still don't see it, and the discussion we have since yesterday doesnt strike you as possibly being related to anti

Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Marc Cluet marc.cl...@canonical.com wrote: Amongst those projects are Orchestra and Ensemble, both are mainly driven by Canonical but are Ubuntu projects, as emerging projects they do need some time to catch the community interest, so far they've been driving

Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Oliver Grawert
hi, Am Donnerstag, den 04.08.2011, 10:56 -0400 schrieb Mackenzie Morgan: On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote: hi, Am Donnerstag, den 04.08.2011, 10:12 -0400 schrieb Mackenzie Morgan: More like: Ugh, these two getting upset about the people they manage

Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Laura Czajkowski
Knowing that there isn't any bad intentions on either side, I share the feeling that we get Canonical employees trying to rush through the process, and when that gets pushed back on, some key people who walk the Canonical/Ubuntu line make it worse by publicly undermining the process. That is

Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Chase Douglas
On 08/04/2011 08:52 AM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote: On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Chase Douglas chase.doug...@canonical.com wrote: Realistically, you also can't expect that if you are on a publicly elected board that evaluates individuals that there will not be disagreements. It is a very

Re: SRUs for typo fixes in descriptions

2011-08-04 Thread Sebastien Bacher
On jeu., 2011-08-04 at 07:36 -0700, Brian Murray wrote: This should also be modified to include: * ... Apport package hook additions Could be not? Or could we move those out of the software binaries? One complain we often get in reviews and online comments is the new of updates showing up

Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Dustin Kirkland
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Mackenzie Morgan maco...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote: hi, Am Donnerstag, den 04.08.2011, 10:12 -0400 schrieb Mackenzie Morgan: More like: Ugh, these two getting upset about the people they manage being

Re: Understanding the definitions and expectations of our membership processes

2011-08-04 Thread Michael Bienia
On 2011-08-02 11:50:52 -0700, Chase Douglas wrote: On 07/29/2011 11:24 AM, Jordon Bedwell wrote: Hola, On Fri, July 29, 2011 11:01 am, Michael Bienia wrote: This leads to the next question: how much do you trust the person writing the endorsement? Of course I trust endorsements

KDE 4.7 packages

2011-08-04 Thread Harald Sitter
markey apachelogger: the KDE 4.7 packages for 11.04 are outstanding. upgrade was very smooth :) markey upgraded half of our office, and my home box Good job ninjas! Thanks for all your awesome! -- kubuntu-devel mailing list kubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at:

Patch pilot report, 2011-08-05.

2011-08-04 Thread Luke Yelavich
* Bug 820773: Uploaded * lp:~kentb/ubuntu/oneiric/xine-lib/xine-lib-fix-810407/+merge/68306: Previous review suggested the bug be filed upstream. No notification of this being done, and I couldn't find an upstream bug, so filed a bug, and attached the patch to it. *

Re: Did I miss some package so I can not compile read_write_mutex.hpp in boost?

2011-08-04 Thread Dmitry Andreychuk
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 5:55 AM, eric fs...@att.net wrote: dear boost progamers:  when I tried to compile from my g++4.5.2 a simple file which include #include boost/thread/read_write_mutex.hpp --- root_at_eric-laptop:/home/eric/cppcookbook/ch12# g++ -lboost_thread Example12-3.cpp

Re: Reboot not work on Dell OptiPlex 750 desktop at Ubuntu Natty distro

2011-08-04 Thread Jonathan Davies
On 30/07/11 16:12, Sharl.Jimh.Tsin wrote: hi,all: i am using Ubuntu 11.04 Natty on my office's desktop which model is Dell OptiPlex 750 serials.recently i found that the reboot function of this OS never worked,it will make the OS hanged and with no response of the keyboard or mouse. only

MSI cx623 310M 1GB DDR3 NVIDIA -- Ubuntu

2011-08-04 Thread Pop Horea
Hi, I have a laptop with video card MSI cx623 310M 1GB DDR3 NVIDIA. Graphics locks throughout the system and force me to give restart with CTRL + F1 thenCTRL + LA + DEL. I have bumblebee with nouveau (enabled) installed. It will be done something for this graphic card ? in order maybe to operate