On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Oliver Grawert <[email protected]> wrote: > hi, > Am Mittwoch, den 03.08.2011, 17:05 -0400 schrieb Scott Kitterman: >> >> Much of this entire discussion was started by Canonical employees wanting >> special case treatment for upstream work sponsored by Canonical. > this is totally untrue if i read the log [1] from the meeting that > caused you to start this rant against canonical ...
See Robbie & Dustin both second-guessing the DMB here in [2] Dustin got upset here [3], when an applicant who said he believed his work to be on a "separate project" [4] did not get accepted. There was also the time Robbie criticized the regional board for saying Kate hadn't been around long enough yet for membership [5] > [1] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/08/02/%23ubuntu-meeting.txt [2] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/06/20/%23ubuntu-meeting.html#t21:19 [3] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/07/18/%23ubuntu-meeting.html#t20:00 [4] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/07/18/%23ubuntu-meeting.html#t19:45 [5] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/12/17/%23ubuntu-meeting.html#t04:21 -- Mackenzie Morgan -- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
