Re: ebtables update breaks ubuntu updates on WSL

This isn't a problem with ebtables, it's a problem in WSL. Note in the long WSL issues bug 1761 you linked to; there are reports of this problem with packages other than just ebtables (for example, that bug starts by complaining about mdadm). On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 5:21 PM, Hayden Barnes

Re: ebtables update breaks ubuntu updates on WSL

On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 8:47 AM, Balint Reczey wrote: > Hi Dan, > > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Dan Streetman > wrote: >> This isn't a problem with ebtables, it's a problem in WSL. Note in >> the long WSL issues bug 1761 you linked to; there are reports of this

Re: apt update behaves differently from apt-get update

On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 4:23 PM Nish Aravamudan wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 9:46 AM Lao Shaw wrote: >> >> On my freshly installed ubuntu 18.06 my cron job use 'apt-get' as 'apt' is >> not recommended to be used in scripts. however, 'apt-get update' will keep >> back my packages while

Re: Suggestion: Native Linux Network Encryption (NLNE)

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 1:05 PM, Jesse Cox wrote: > You guys don't know me. I'm not a developer of the OS but I think I have > something which could benefit it in the long run. > > Here's the thing: I've been watching video after video about data security > and encryption and

Re: [Feedback needed] New tool for proposed migration help

On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 4:58 AM Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote: > > Hi! > > Lukasz and I wrote a new tool to attempt to help with proposed migration > (well, we did that at least a year ago). I just added it to > lp:ubuntu-dev-tools (apologies, this was done without much consultation > prior to

Re: New PPU uploader - Erich Eickmeyer

congrats Erich! On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 7:23 AM Lukasz Zemczak wrote: > > Hello! > > More good news! Please congratulate Erich his successful PPU uploader > application as well! Once the ACLs are applied, Erich will have upload > permissions to the following packages: > > carla >

Re: New PPU uploader - Ross Gammon

congrats Ross! On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 7:20 AM Lukasz Zemczak wrote: > > Hey everyone, > > Please congratulate Ross on his successful PPU uploader application! > Once the ACLs are applied, Ross will have upload permissions to the > following packages: > > carla > grub2-theme-ubuntustudio >

anyone still use 'import-bug-from-debian'?

As far as I can tell, this hasn't been used by anyone in a long time, or at least only a small number of times. Can anyone who uses it let me know? -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at:

Re: anyone still use 'import-bug-from-debian'?

On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 10:04 AM Colin Watson wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 08:40:39AM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote: > > As far as I can tell, this hasn't been used by anyone in a long time, > > or at least only a small number of times. > > > > Can anyone who us

Re: questions re: package qemu-system-sparc

On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 1:33 PM wrote: > > [Emailing here because it's the published maintainer address for Ubuntu > package qemu-system-sparc. Please redirect me if I should look elsewhere.] > > From what I've been able to find within Ubuntu 18.10, the latest available > version of

how sudo handles $HOME

in Ubuntu, sudo retains the calling user's $HOME this is different from upstream sudo as well as all other UNIXes and even the sudo documentation we provide. Should we remove our custom patch that adds this behavior? for reference and more details on downsides of our current sudo behavior, see:

Re: how sudo handles $HOME

-0400, Dan Streetman wrote: > > in Ubuntu, sudo retains the calling user's $HOME > > > > this is different from upstream sudo as well as all other UNIXes and > > even the sudo documentation we provide. Should we remove our custom > > patch that adds this behavio

Re: how sudo handles $HOME

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 6:35 AM Carl Friis-Hansen wrote: > > On 5/16/19 3:03 AM, Alex Murray wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2019-05-15 at 02:42:56 +0930, Dan Streetman wrote: > > > >> in Ubuntu, sudo retains the calling user's $HOME > >> > >> this i

Re: Application for Contributing Developer: Seyeong Kim

Congratulations Seyeong! On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 11:46 AM Eric Desrochers wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > Please congratulate Seyeong Kim (xtrusia) on his today's successful > contributing developer application ! > > On behalf of the DMB, > > Eric Desrochers (slashd) > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at

Re: libc6 == glibc ?

On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 10:41 AM Lenge wrote: > > Hi ubuntu developers, > why is the glibc named libc6, not libc5 or libc7 ? thanks. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_C_Library#Fork_%22Linux_libc%22 > > -- > lenge > -- > Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list >

Re: Improving the Sponsorship Queue and Other Reports (WAS: Re: State of the Sponsorship Queue - Can we get it to 0?)

On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:27 PM Simon Quigley wrote: > > Hello Sebastien, > > On 4/23/19 4:47 AM, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > > Hey Simon, > > > > Le 21/04/2019 à 00:12, Simon Quigley a écrit : > >> Today I spent a few hours sifting through the sponsorship queue. I > >> sponsored everything I

Fwd: Call for votes: Developer Membership Board restaffing

for candidates. -- Forwarded message - From: Dan Streetman Date: Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 9:52 AM Subject: Re: Call for votes: Developer Membership Board restaffing To: Robie Basak Cc: , devel-permissions On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 9:38 AM Robie Basak wrote: > > The Developer Membership

Re: Call for nominations: Developer Membership Board

On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 8:26 PM Seth Arnold wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:21:10AM +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > > P.S. Just an opinion and entirely up to you, the alternating meeting time > > is hard to plan for everyone. > > I haven't kept close track of the meetings but my

Re: RFC: Ubuntu HA resource-agents supportability

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:09 AM Rafael David Tinoco wrote: > > Hello, > > As many as you know I'm currently revamping Ubuntu High Availability > Packages > > For 20.04, considered HA (or HA related) packages are: > > - Core packages: > > - libqb > - kronosnet > - corosync > - pacemaker >

Re: RFC: Ubuntu HA resource-agents supportability

On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 10:47 PM Rafael David Tinoco wrote: > > > I added a few comments below, otherwise all the categories look > > reasonable to me, thanks! > > Thanks for the feedback Dan! > > > > clvm- clvmd daemon (cluster logical vol manager) > > > > Was clvm dropped

Re: RFC: Ubuntu HA resource-agents supportability

On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 7:24 PM Seth Arnold wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 03:54:11PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote: > > > Xen - xen unprivileged domains > > > > as cpaelzer mentioned, Xen should probably move up to the 'best > > effort'

Re: RFC: Ubuntu HA resource-agents supportability

On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:13 PM Rafael David Tinoco wrote: > > On 29/04/2020 00:10, Rafael David Tinoco wrote: > > Dan, Billy, and all... > > part of the result from this thread is at: > > https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/ubuntu-ha-pacemaker-resource-agents-supportability/ > > And the fence agents

Re: PerPackageApplication OpenStack package set

I'm happy to announce Chris's successful application for upload rights for the OpenStack package set! Congratulations, Chris. On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 11:34 AM Chris MacNaughton wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like to announce that I am applying for per-package upload rights for the > OpenStack package

Re: SRU shift report: 2020-09-23

On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 10:11 AM Robie Basak wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 08:02:23AM -0400, Thomas Ward wrote: > > Original SRU 'justification' written in the bug[1] states the regression > > risk is "There should be none." As you stated elsewhere, "none" is not > > a valid

Re: Adjusting what fstypes df displays

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:39 AM Bryce Harrington wrote: > > These days, df displays a lot of mount points, due to the increased use > of non-consumable filesystems such as tmpfs and squashfs. This clutter > is particularly noticeable using df in Ubuntu, due to the increased > popularity of

Re: Ubuntu Studio Packageset application for Erich Eickmeyer

(resending to lists as I forgot to include them on cc of original email) On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:22 AM Erich Eickmeyer wrote: > > Hi DMB, > > I have added myself to the agenda for the April 20th DMB meeting to > apply for upload rights to the Ubuntu Studio packageset at the > urging/bidding of

Re: package set application for ~ubuntu-mozilla-uploaders

On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 11:42 AM Olivier Tilloy wrote: > > Hi DMB, > > I hereby request membership in the ~ubuntu-mozilla-uploaders team (mozilla > package set). Sorry for the delay in announcing. At the April 20 meeting of the DMB, osomon received 4 +1 votes and is now a member of

Re: Running autopkgtests from PPA on real infrastructure

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 12:07 PM Olivier Tilloy wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 5:13 PM Iain Lane wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 03:53:01PM +0200, Lukas Märdian wrote: > > > * Upload your package (incl. debian/tests/*) to your PPA > > > * Get a core-dev/MOTU to trigger the test for

Re: default algorithm in package zram-config 0.5

about changing the default in zram Why do you want to change the default in Ubuntu but not in the upstream kernel? > , only in the package zram-config > (i.e. when setting it up). > > Le 09/06/2020 à 00:33, Dan Streetman a écrit : > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 3:42 PM Mitch 74 wrote:

Re: default algorithm in package zram-config 0.5

On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 3:42 PM Mitch 74 wrote: > > Hello, > > Considering that now lz4 is by default enabled in kernel, wouldn't it be > better to use it as a compression algorithm in zram instead of lzo? the zram default upstream is still lzo (lzo-rle). you can select zram alg for each device,

Re: Application for membership in DKMS packageset uploader team

At the Nov 16 meeting of the DMB, we unanimously approved sforshee's application to join the (newly created) Ubuntu Kernel DKMS Uploaders team, with permission to upload packages in the (newly created) kernel-dkms packageset. Congratulations! On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 10:43 AM Seth Forshee

Re: Packaging policy discussion: After=network-online.target

On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 3:52 AM Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > There's an nfs-utils SRU¹ hanging around waiting for a policy decision > on use of the After=network-online.target systemd unit dependency. I'm > not an expert here, but it looks like part of my SRU

Re: nfs-common won't restart all services after upgrade

On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 8:34 AM Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > Hi, > > tl;dr > > I filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/1928259 > found while testing > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/1927745 and > verifying that rpc.gssd was not restarted after

Re: firebird3.0 install on Ubuntu 16.04.7 LTS (Xenial Xerus)

On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 10:21 AM Thomas Ward wrote: > > And once more, ESM rears its head. > > ESM comes with no community support. Support for ESM releases is for *paid > Canonical support via Ubuntu Advantage subscriptions*. Just to clarify this slightly, ESM does not come with any

Re: DKMS upload rights application

On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 10:53 AM Marcelo Henrique Cerri wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to announce my application for membership in the DKMS > package set uploader team. My application can be found at: > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MarceloCerri/DkmsUploadApplication After a unanimous +4 vote,

Re: Results of archive rebuild against OpenSSL3

On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 4:09 AM Simon Chopin wrote: > > Hello, > > As some of you may be aware, the OpenSSL project is working towards a > major OpenSSL 3.0 version, which will not be ABI compatible with > the current 1.1 branch[0]. They have recently released a first Release > Candidate

Re: Plan to reform the Ubuntu Backporters Team [was: Proposal: sunset the backports pockets]

On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 5:51 PM Dan Streetman wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 11:40 AM Dan Streetman wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 10:20 AM Robie Basak wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 05:00:26PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote: > >

Re: Plan to reform the Ubuntu Backporters Team [was: Proposal: sunset the backports pockets]

On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 11:40 AM Dan Streetman wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 10:20 AM Robie Basak wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 05:00:26PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote: > > > So as far as next steps based on your proposal, it seems like: > > > >

Re: Plan to reform the Ubuntu Backporters Team [was: Proposal: sunset the backports pockets]

On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 12:11 PM Robie Basak wrote: > > Hi Iain, > > Perhaps I see the situation differently from you. From my perspective, > this is an extraordinary intervention "from above" by consensus from > Ubuntu developers. The backporters team has been unable to act for an > extended

Re: Plan to reform the Ubuntu Backporters Team [was: Proposal: sunset the backports pockets]

On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 10:20 AM Robie Basak wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 05:00:26PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote: > > So as far as next steps based on your proposal, it seems like: > > I detailed the next steps specifically in my proposal but focused on > slightly d

Re: OpenSSL 3.0 transition plans

On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 10:31 AM Simon Chopin wrote: > > Hi all, > > As some of you might have surmised, we're planning to move to OpenSSL > 3.0 [0] for 22.04. This new major release brings of course some new > things, but also breaks API and ABI. If/when we get to 3.0, please do let upstream

Re: SRU developer application

On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 10:10 AM Heitor Alves de Siqueira wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to apply for the SRU Developer role, and have added myself to the > DMB agenda for the meeting on the 23rd of August. > > My application can be found here: > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/halves/sru-developer At

Re: Add ubuntu-advantage-tools to Recommends on ubuntu-minimal

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 4:51 AM Lucas Moura wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Recently, we have received a request about moving ubuntu-advantage-tools from > Depends to Recommends on ubuntu-minimal and update-manager as can be seen > here: >

Re: Core Dev application: Paride Legovini (paride)

On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 8:20 AM Paride Legovini wrote: > > Dear DMB, > > I hereby apply to become a Core Developer: At the DMB meeting on 2021-12-13, as well as after the meeting in email to the mailing list, your application for Ubuntu Core Developer was unanimously approved (excluding

Re: Change unattended-upgrades from Depends to Recommends on ubuntu-server-minimal

On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 6:18 PM Steve Langasek wrote: > > Matthew, Jay, thanks for pressing on this. > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 05:36:15PM -0800, Jay Vosburgh wrote: > > Steve Langasek wrote: > > > >Hi Matthew, > > > >On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 03:28:32PM +1300, Matthew Ruffell wrote: > > > >It's

Re: git-ubuntu rich history beta

On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:52 PM Robie Basak wrote: > > git-ubuntu is now able to accept rich history directly from any uploader. > > The CLI is in beta and subject to change. Feedback appreciated! > > # Summary > > sudo snap refresh --beta git-ubuntu # beta channel snap required sorry to

Re: Setting NotAutomatic for hirsute+1-proposed

On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 11:27 AM Colin Watson wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 11:12:57AM +, Iain Lane wrote: > > I think the Launchpad support is still missing, although we started on > > this several years ago. That will need to be picked up and finished off: > > > >

Re: Setting NotAutomatic for hirsute+1-proposed

On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 9:04 AM Colin Watson wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 08:32:53AM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote: > > Just to clarify, people won't need to manually specify all > > dependencies, right? For example, if testing the 'systemd' package > > from -pro

Re: Setting NotAutomatic for hirsute+1-proposed

On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 9:10 AM Robie Basak wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 04:27:31PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > This is now ready to use from the Launchpad point of view. There's a > > "proposed_not_automatic" flag on distro series exported over the API; if > > this is set to True,

Re: Ubuntu Server Developer application

On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 5:48 PM Athos Ribeiro wrote: > > Hello, > > I hereby apply for membership as an Ubuntu Server package set uploader. At the DMB meeting on 2021-12-13, by unanimous vote your application was approved. Congratulations! > > My application is available at > >

Re: Proposal: sunset the backports pockets

On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 8:06 AM Robie Basak wrote: > > Dear Ubuntu Developers, > > As far as I am aware, the Ubuntu Backports Team has been inactive for > years now, and backports requests and uploads just languish in > Launchpad. Thomas Ward last proposed an effort to revitalise it over two >

Re: Proposal: sunset the backports pockets

On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 8:38 AM Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote: > > On 2021-07-20 13:58, Dan Streetman wrote: > > Yes, objection here. The backports pocket is still in use. > > > > If I understand correctly, as discussed in much greater length in > > other posts in

Re: Plan to reform the Ubuntu Backporters Team [was: Proposal: sunset the backports pockets]

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 6:11 AM Robie Basak wrote: > > Thank you for volunteering! As we have at least one qualified person > committed, I'd be very happy to see the backports pocket continue. As a > concrete proposal, I suggest we do this by reforming ~ubuntu-backporters > as follows. > > In

Re: Change unattended-upgrades from Depends to Recommends on ubuntu-server-minimal

ent is not a universal truth, but is a good starting point for >> considering the importance of unattended-upgrades in a cloud context. > > > The larger scale the deployment, the more expertise we can assume on the part > of the deployer though. Please don't assume that. The

Re: Ubuntu LTS20.04 - wireguard package

On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 6:17 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 2:02 PM Filip Menke wrote: > > > > Is there a reason why the wireguard package is outdated and no updates are > > available through the standard update process(apt-get update / upgrade)? > > > > Users must update

Re: Ubuntu LTS20.04 - wireguard package

On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 12:35 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 8:36 AM Dan Streetman wrote: > > ... > > > Fedora has a 6 month release cycle. Each version you are on has the > > > latest releases of its packages and gets full updates. And i

Re: Call for nominations: Developer Membership Board

On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 9:20 AM Robie Basak wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 08:56:23AM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote: > > I would like to officially call for a DMB vote on extending DMB > > eligibility to members of the ~ubuntu-sru-developers team. > > Previous disc

Re: Call for nominations: Developer Membership Board

On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 8:52 AM Robie Basak wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 03:51:22PM +, Robie Basak wrote: > > Three members - Simon Quigley, Eric Desrochers and Rafael David Tinoco - > > have recently vacated their seats on the DMB. Subsequently, this email > > is a call for nominations

Re: Call for nominations: Developer Membership Board

On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 9:44 PM Seth Arnold wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 10:37:07AM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote: > > In any case, all this formality really is exhausting and I don't care > > to pursue it, since you seem to be saying that I can't call for a DMB &g

Re: Nominations: Developer Membership Board

On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 3:09 PM Brian Murray wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 02:54:02PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 9:40 AM Onno Benschop wrote: > > > > > > One way to leverage these volunteers is to deputise them and have them >

Re: Nominations: Developer Membership Board

On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 7:57 PM Seth Arnold wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 12:09:27PM -0700, Brian Murray wrote: > On Thu, Mar > 17, 2022 at 02:54:02PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote: > > Haven't there problems with reaching the number of votes necessary for a > > quorum

Re: Call for nominations: Developer Membership Board

On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 9:19 AM Sebastien Bacher wrote: > > Hey Robie and DMB members, > > Le 01/03/2022 à 16:51, Robie Basak a écrit : > > Candidates must expect to be able to attend the majority of DMB > > meetings. Currently these take place on IRC, are scheduled on alternate > > Mondays with

Re: Ubuntu-dev-tools' "pull-lp-source" not overriding default configurations?

I'd recommend opening a bug with this info on launchpad. On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 10:36 AM Hariri, Nader wrote: > > Hi, > > According to the manpages, "pull-lp-source" script should parse environment > variables or devscripts file to override package-wide variables. > > However, this is not

Re: Application for per-package upload rights for openvswitch and ovn packages

On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 7:45 AM Frode Nordahl wrote: > > Hello fellow hackers, > > I hereby put forward my application for per-package upload rights for the > Open vSwitch and OVN packages [0]. after a vote on the mailing list and then at the 2022-04-04 DMB meeting, your application for PPU

Re: Call for votes: Developer Membership Board restaffing

On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 8:57 AM Robie Basak wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 06:14:27AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote: > > Where are the rules/policies written down about how elections should > > be handled? > > The first time I ran an election I couldn't find much docu

Re: Call for votes: Developer Membership Board restaffing

On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 9:45 AM Robie Basak wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 09:19:31AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote: > > For example, in this situation; carrying out an election really > > shouldn't be an exceptional event. > > Normally it isn't. Previous ele

Re: Call for votes: Developer Membership Board restaffing

On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 10:22 AM Robie Basak wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 10:14:06AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote: > > Do you have evidence that has actually happened to anyone in this > > case? I was able to vote quite easily, and it seems (from your ML > > comme

Re: Call for votes: Developer Membership Board restaffing

On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 6:02 AM Robie Basak wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 12:51:52PM +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > > If you happen to activate the "wrong" email you'll just see: > > > > ``` > > Email address successfully activated. > > ``` > > > > But if you activate the right one

Re: Call for votes: Developer Membership Board restaffing

On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 6:02 AM Robie Basak wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 12:51:52PM +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > > If you happen to activate the "wrong" email you'll just see: > > > > ``` > > Email address successfully activated. > > ``` > > > > But if you activate the right one

Re: Call for votes: Developer Membership Board restaffing

On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 6:14 AM Dan Streetman wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 6:02 AM Robie Basak wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 12:51:52PM +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > > > If you happen to activate the "wrong" email you'll just see:

Re: MOTU application: Frank Heimes (fheimes)

On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 2:57 AM Frank Heimes wrote: > > Dear DMB, > I hereby apply to become a MOTU (and Ubuntu Contributing Developer). Hello, sorry for the delay! At the DMB meeting 2022-01-24, as well as from DMB member votes by email after the meeting, your application for Ubuntu

Bileto

How do I get access to bileto? Everyone in canonical product engineering seems to use this system but I've never had access. Is it restricted to only some canonical employees? Thanks! -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at:

Re: isc-dhcp: should we start phasing it out?

On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 3:06 PM Steve Langasek wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 02:34:30PM -0300, Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > Alternatives that come to mind are: > > - kea, of course (from ISC). dhcp server only. > > - dnsmasq (for small installations?), also server > > -

Re: systemd-oomd issues on desktop

On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 3:03 PM Nick Rosbrook wrote: > > Hi, > > During the 22.04 cycle, we enabled systemd-oomd [1] by default on > desktop. Since then, there have been reports of systemd-oomd killing > user applications too frequently (e.g. browsers, IDEs, and gnome-shell > in some cases). In

Re: Bileto

On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 5:18 PM Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > > On Thursday, June 02 2022, Dan Streetman wrote: > > > How do I get access to bileto? Everyone in canonical product engineering > > seems to use this system but I've never had access. Is it restricted to &g

Re: systemd-oomd issues on desktop

On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 4:05 PM Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 03:19:36PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote: > > > 4. Increase swap on Ubuntu. I am adding this for completeness, but I > > > doubt this is a viable option. > > > Personally, I thin

Re: systemd-oomd issues on desktop

On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 2:16 PM Sebastien Bacher wrote: > > Le 09/06/2022 à 21:19, Dan Streetman a écrit : > > Personally, I think this is the correct option. 1GB is not a good > > default swap size. > > Did we ever consider doing the same than fedora is doing there? >

Re: systemd-oomd issues on desktop

On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 11:25 AM Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 11:40:52AM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 03:19:36PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote: > > > > > I think that either option (1) or (3) would be the most reasona

Re: isc-dhcp: should we start phasing it out?

On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 5:06 AM Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > On Mon, 16 May 2022 at 20:22, Dan Streetman wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 3:06 PM Steve Langasek > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Andreas, > > > > > > On M

Re: Proposal: move byobu (and run-one) to universe

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 3:41 PM Brian Murray wrote: > > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 02:55:43PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote: > > On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 11:22 AM Paride Legovini wrote: > > > > > > Hi -devel, > > > > > > The status of src:byobu

Re: Proposal: move byobu (and run-one) to universe

On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 11:22 AM Paride Legovini wrote: > > Hi -devel, > > The status of src:byobu appears to be less than ideal, and this has been > the case for several cycles now. I think we should consider moving it > from main to universe in kinetic. The general feedback from the Server >