On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 8:26 PM Seth Arnold <seth.arn...@canonical.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:21:10AM +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > > P.S. Just an opinion and entirely up to you, the alternating meeting time > > is hard to plan for everyone. > > I haven't kept close track of the meetings but my impression is that most > of them end with "well, there's no quorum, sorry you showed up,
I have kept close track, and unfortunately the DMB only reached quorum 38.46% of the time in 2019 (10 of 26 meetings). > lets do > this next time or over email". Email voting has been done by the DMB very rarely; for example, there is currently a vote by email pending since Feb 3 (6 days ago), after a 7 day period for any questions from the DMB (Jan 27 - Feb 3), and only 2 DMB members have provided a vote so far. > > It's hard to have enthusiasm for this. I agree. > > Can we replace the meeting with something else entirely, something that > fits better into the schedules of distributed, busy, people? I have submitted myself as a nominee for the DMB, and if elected (if there are enough interested candidates to have an election) I hope to help improve this process. > > Thanks > -- > ubuntu-devel mailing list > ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
