IMHO, Snap Store is more like an app store (like Google Play Store),
than a regular package repository (archive.ubuntu.com, a PPA or a
third party repository).
I think some ground rules and some policies are necessary, but we must
avoid burocracy and give freedom to developer, so he/she can create
On 02/09/2018 11:48 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
> For better or worse, the snap store doesn't have teams. Should this be
> rephrased in terms of collaboration or something?
Well, I'd rather we set the expectation that the snap store learn to use
LP teams.
Mark
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
Hi Colin,
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 10:00:28AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 09:37:17AM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 03:10:08PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Snaps included in images will be installed referencing a per-Ubuntu-series
> > > branch.
With snaps we no longer get crash reporting to errors.ubuntu.com. We
should add support for snap crash reporting to apport. This isn't all that
useful without debug symbols, so we should investigate how we can make
builds with debug symbols available as well. Just a couple things I think
we
On 02/09/2018 12:18 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 11:20:53AM +0100, Oliver Grawert wrote:
>> Am Freitag, den 09.02.2018, 09:37 + schrieb Robie Basak:
>>> Should this be a side effect subject to change of store policy
>>> (which I think is outside the scope of the Ubuntu
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 11:20:53AM +0100, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 09.02.2018, 09:37 + schrieb Robie Basak:
> > Should this be a side effect subject to change of store policy
> > (which I think is outside the scope of the Ubuntu project?), or
> > should we define "no devmode" as
hi,
Am Freitag, den 09.02.2018, 10:30 + schrieb Robie Basak:
>
> I think you missed my point.
i definitely read it completely differently, yes,
sorry for the noise :)
ciao
oli
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 11:20:53AM +0100, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> > Should this be a side effect subject to change of store policy (which
> > I
> > think is outside the scope of the Ubuntu project?), or should we
> > define
> > "no devmode" as an Ubuntu policy now?
>
> this is an already existing
hi,
Am Freitag, den 09.02.2018, 09:37 + schrieb Robie Basak:
>
> >
> > As a side effect, since devmode snaps may not be published to the
> > stable
> > channel, only strict and classic confined snaps may be included.
> Should this be a side effect subject to change of store policy (which
> I
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 09:37:17AM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 03:10:08PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Snaps included in images will be installed referencing a per-Ubuntu-series
> > branch. This ensures forwards-compatibility by allowing publishing to this
> > branch
Hi Steve,
Thank you for driving this. I'm looking forward to having leaf desktop
packages available and upgradeable via snaps.
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 03:10:08PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> = Channel availability =
> Including software in the default install of Ubuntu implies a certain
>
Dear developers,
As I'm sure you know, Canonical has recently been putting a lot of work into
the Snap Store[1], a repository for third-party packages that is the successor
to the past extras.ubuntu.com[2] and click packages efforts.
We are confident that snaps today represent a solid delivery
12 matches
Mail list logo
