On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 00:09:44 +0100, J Fernyhough wrote:
>Doesn't `apt-get autoremove` remove old kernel versions already?
Yesno depending on how the meta package is installed, automatically or
manual. However, writhing scripts to manage something to a user's
individual needs isn't hard to do.
I
On 13 October 2016 at 23:18, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
> Hi Jarno,
>
> On 2016-10-13 21:17, Jarno Suni wrote:
>
>> Okay, I have created the project in Launchpad. I am using git.
>> If I get enough support, I will publish the script. Here is where you
>> can support:
>>
Hi Jarno,
On 2016-10-13 21:17, Jarno Suni wrote:
Okay, I have created the project in Launchpad. I am using git.
If I get enough support, I will publish the script. Here is where you
can support:
https://www.bountysource.com/issues/38300038-feature-request-the-command-should-work-like-this
Okay, I have created the project in Launchpad. I am using git.
If I get enough support, I will publish the script. Here is where you can
support:
https://www.bountysource.com/issues/38300038-feature-request-the-command-should-work-like-this
--
Jarno Suni - http://iki.fi/8/
> On Thursday,
On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:42:29 +0200, Xen wrote:
>Can you please come out of your psychosis now?
On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:49:24 +0200, Xen wrote:.
>Ralf Mardorf schreef op 12-10-2016 21:12:
>> I seriously doubt that an Ubuntu maintainer will patch those man
>> pages, in such a wrong way, but you are
Ralf, maybe you should stop telling other people what they should do.
Just saying. That no one needs your advice on what to do, no one is
asking for it. You don't determine what people are free to do and what
not, and you are no moderator here.
You are producing a whole lot of noise giving