Olá Stewart e a todos.
On Friday 27 March 2009 00:09:11 Stewart Johnston wrote:
Slightly to one side, when Apport starts and walks me through the
process of filing a bug, the first thing I do is nip off and search
Launchpad for the same bug, then if I find one I cancel apport.
Its just a
On 03/29/2009 05:29 PM, (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote:
Olá Stewart e a todos.
On Friday 27 March 2009 00:09:11 Stewart Johnston wrote:
Slightly to one side, when Apport starts and walks me through the
process of filing a bug, the first thing I do is nip off and search
Launchpad for the
Stewart Johnston [2009-03-27 11:09 +1100]:
Slightly to one side, when Apport starts and walks me through the
process of filing a bug, the first thing I do is nip off and search
Launchpad for the same bug, then if I find one I cancel apport.
Is this what I should be doing, or is it
Quoting Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com:
Stewart Johnston [2009-03-27 11:09 +1100]:
Slightly to one side, when Apport starts and walks me through the
process of filing a bug, the first thing I do is nip off and search
Launchpad for the same bug, then if I find one I cancel apport.
Is
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 08:44:13PM -0300, Derek Broughton wrote:
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
That's going to be news to the average user, of which a noticeable number
are _still_ using the old bug tools to file a bug straight
to ubuntu-users
We don't install those tools by default, while
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
I've noticed that, even among Ubuntu devleopers, not everyone is applying
our best practices for reporting bugs. In particular, reporting bugs
directly to Launchpad is usually *NOT* the best approach. This should only
be done if there is no better option.
In almost
Hi
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
our best practices for reporting bugs. In particular, reporting bugs
directly to Launchpad is usually *NOT* the best approach. This should only
Perhaps Launchpad could specifically discourage this within /ubuntu/ and
offer up much the same information in your mail?
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:38:44PM +, Chris Jones wrote:
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
our best practices for reporting bugs. In particular, reporting bugs
directly to Launchpad is usually *NOT* the best approach. This should only
Perhaps Launchpad could specifically discourage this within
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:38:44PM +, Chris Jones wrote:
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
our best practices for reporting bugs. In particular, reporting bugs
directly to Launchpad is usually *NOT* the best approach. This should
only
Perhaps Launchpad could
On Wednesday 25 March 2009 11:08:11 am Derek Broughton wrote:
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:38:44PM +, Chris Jones wrote:
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
our best practices for reporting bugs. In particular, reporting bugs
directly to Launchpad is usually *NOT* the best
Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
On Wednesday 25 March 2009 11:08:11 am Derek Broughton wrote:
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:38:44PM +, Chris Jones wrote:
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
our best practices for reporting bugs. In particular, reporting
bugs
directly to
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 03:46:05PM -0300, Derek Broughton wrote:
Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
On Wednesday 25 March 2009 11:08:11 am Derek Broughton wrote:
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:38:44PM +, Chris Jones wrote:
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
our best practices for
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
That's going to be news to the average user, of which a noticeable number
are _still_ using the old bug tools to file a bug straight
to ubuntu-users
We don't install those tools by default, while we do install apport.
I know, but there's still a significant number of
13 matches
Mail list logo
