This isn't a problem with ebtables, it's a problem in WSL. Note in
the long WSL issues bug 1761 you linked to; there are reports of this
problem with packages other than just ebtables (for example, that bug
starts by complaining about mdadm).
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 5:21 PM, Hayden Barnes
On 2018-05-30 09:04, Marty E. Plummer wrote:
> Maintainers, I'd really like to hear your thoughts on this matter. If
> the diffs are produced as -p1 unified diffs, then downstreams who do
> convert from -p0 context won't have to, and distros who work around it
> won't either.
>
> Regards,
>
>
On 2018-05-30 09:04, Marty E. Plummer wrote:
> Maintainers, I'd really like to hear your thoughts on this matter. If
> the diffs are produced as -p1 unified diffs, then downstreams who do
> convert from -p0 context won't have to, and distros who work around it
> won't either.
Speaking as
"Marty E. Plummer" wrote:
> Maintainers, I'd really like to hear your thoughts on this matter. If
> the diffs are produced as -p1 unified diffs, then downstreams who do
> convert from -p0 context won't have to, and distros who work around it
> won't either.
Alpine Linux uses -p1 and unified
I just rcvd a brand new 10TB Ironwolf Red drive; not the first
I have set up by a long shot, but there seems to be an issue
in getting this one formatted.
No matter what I do I end up with messages about misaligned
partitions.
I tried the 16.04 ubuntu server install first as it required
an
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 8:47 AM, Balint Reczey
wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Dan Streetman
> wrote:
>> This isn't a problem with ebtables, it's a problem in WSL. Note in
>> the long WSL issues bug 1761 you linked to; there are reports of this
>> problem with packages
Hi Dan,
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Dan Streetman
wrote:
> This isn't a problem with ebtables, it's a problem in WSL. Note in
> the long WSL issues bug 1761 you linked to; there are reports of this
> problem with packages other than just ebtables (for example, that bug
> starts by
