Vishal Rao schrieb:
> What about other packages like Eclipse (which currently shows at 3.2)
did you package 3.4? very cool! where can I find the package?
Matthias
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubunt
David MENTRE schrieb:
> The following source packages would be good candidate for synchronization:
> camlpdf
> ocaml-libvirt
> ocamlpam
> janest-core
> camlimages
> ocamlgsl
> galax
> ocamlgraph
> ocaml-inotify
David, please could you file a bug report, together with the changelogs for t
On 18.08.2009 19:06, John David Anglin wrote:
>> seen as well in the gcc-snapshot build. Looks like the configure test doesn't
>> pass -DCLOOG_PPL_BACKEND for the cloog version check.
>
> When I built and installed libcloog on hpux11.11, an additional
> header was installed that defined CLOOG_PPL_B
On 19.08.2009 16:03, John David Anglin wrote:
>>> When I built and installed libcloog on hpux11.11, an additional
>>> header was installed that defined CLOOG_PPL_BACKEND.
>>
>> which one? At least the header which is included by GCC doesn't define this
>
> /* include/cloog/cloog-config.h. Generate
On 07.10.2010 18:07, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
>> That's an interesting optimisation; I didn't really know about it
>> either. However, I did use 7zip's Deflate compressor to recompress a
>> .zip file of OpenOffice.org's from 5.9 MB to 5.4 MB. The method was
>> rather crude, but it did the job:
>
[ compression related discussion removed ]
So maybe we can save some MB with better compression, but we can save more by
not including files at all. Of course this requires inspection of the packages
included on the liveCD. In the past we did identify some issues and did add
some diagnostics
On 11/08/2011 10:41 AM, Steffen Dettmer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hope I ask on the right place, otherwise a redirection is appreciated.
> I write here because "dpkg-query -p gcc-4.4-arm-linux-gnueabi" tells:
> Maintainer: Ubuntu Core developers .
> On debian-arm mailinglist I learnt it could be a ubuntu
Am 18.04.2013 20:25, schrieb John Moser:
> Meant to go to list
> On Apr 18, 2013 2:15 PM, "John Moser" wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 18, 2013 2:07 PM, "Insanity Bit" wrote:
>>>
>>> On 64bit multiple services (pulseaudio, rsyslogd, many others) are
>> shipping without Position Independent Code. On 32bit
Saucy is now open for development, with syncs from unstable currently running.
The development version starts with updated versions of GCC and boost.
- GCC 4.8 is now the default compiler, introducing among other things
improved C++11 support, AddressSanitizer , a fast memory error detector,
Am 19.01.2014 21:16, schrieb Sam Bull:
> Is there any chance we can get a fixed version of Blender available
> sometime soon? The Ubuntu package is missing Collada support for some
> reason, and according to the bug report has been for some time now.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/b
On 02/13/2015 05:26 PM, John Lenton wrote:
> Go 1.3.3, which we are shipping in Vivid, is unmaintained upstream¹
> (yes, despite being released less than six months ago).
>
> Would it be possible to move to 1.4 in vivid? This wouldn't fix the
> fact that it will become unmaintained in Vivid's time
Hi,
two test rebuilds for vivid are almost finished on all architectures (pending
powerpc and arm64). It's time to address the build failures seen with these
test rebuilds. The most important ones are listed in [1] for the vivid
archives. These really have to be addressed.
In preparation for t
On 06.01.2016 11:47, Peter Steinbach wrote:
Hi -
I am the developer of a CUDA library and the users recently reported a bug for
ubuntu 15.10. As CUDA currently does not support gcc 5.*, I have to compile all
host binaries with gcc-4.9. The funny thing, my build system bails out with the
follo
On 29.06.2016 15:37, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
>
> Folks, I think we need to understand whether i386 won't be widely used
> for very small IoT devices and hence be important for developers
> targeting those. I accept i386 i no longer relevant for PC's and
> laptops, but I would not be surprised if
On 19.10.2016 02:01, Dylan Taft wrote:
> Hey -
> Apologies for the direct email.
>
> There are some outstanding bugs filed
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libxi/+bug/1360342
>
> http://packages.ubuntu.com/yakkety/i386/libxi-dev/filelist
> http://packages.ubuntu.com/yakkety/amd64/libxi
On 24.10.2016 20:02, Aaron Gable wrote:
> Yes, both points are true, which is why I initially asked if this could be
> upgraded as a [security] fix. This is certainly a security upgrade --
> preventing POODLE and actually enforcing SSL validation (which lots of
> folks *think* the're getting, but a
Control: retitle -1 dangling src.zip symlink
the proposed patch doesn't work, because the src package is a binary independent
package.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-d
Hi,
it's this time of the year where you go to your vacation, and look at a new
shiny new GCC version in the archive when you come back. Well, not exactly ...
I'm planning to change the default on Aug 03/04, and then working to get things
migrated and buildable again, including two transitions f
It is my understanding that having a Firefox ESR package in Ubuntu,
- you need to have a distribution agreement with Mozilla.
- you commit to keep the esr packages up to date, bot in development
versions, and at least in LTS releases.
- you use a separate namespace than the firefox package
On 10.05.2018 00:12, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
> On 2018-05-09 14:54, Oliver Grawert wrote:
>> Am Mittwoch, den 09.05.2018, 16:07 -0400 schrieb Bryan Quigley:
>>> Less and less non-amd64-compatible i386 hardware is available for
>>> consumers to buy today from anything but computer part recycling
>>
On 13.05.2018 05:00, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:25 PM, Thomas Ward wrote:
>> However, killing i386 support globally could introduce issues, including
>> but not limited to certain upstream softwares having to go away
>> entirely, due to the interdependency or issues with how
On 3/23/20 5:36 PM, Daniel Dromboski wrote:
> Just sent this to "ubuntu-devel," but it probably should have been
> posted here instead...
>
> ---
>
> Hi,
>
> At the moment, neither "python-is-python2-but-deprecated" nor
> "python-is-python3" provide the "python" package.
"python-is-python2-but-
On 2/15/21 3:17 AM, Alex Murray wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> For Ubuntu we try and take an approach where we want as much code that
> is compiled for and *on* Ubuntu to try and take advantage of the various
> toolchain hardening options that are available. This gives end-users
> the most protection w
Markus Hitter schrieb:
> To get some use out of this installation, I'd like to install
> OpenCascade. While being open source, it comes with a java based
> installer. Unfortunately, running Java doesn't look that well:
>
> /tmp/isijp053E/bin/i386/native_threads/java: error while loading
> sh
Packages for OpenOffice.org 2.2 release candidate 2 are available for
testing; these are not part of any release, so be prepared for
installation glitches and manual downgrades to the version which you can
find in feisty. To test these packages (i386, amd64, powerpc), please
add the following lines
Pavel Rojtberg schrieb:
> my point with the icons was:
> can we have the tango-icons from the jimmac tango branch?
No, not in its current form as a replacement for the well tested
industrial_theme. In its current form its a fork of the industrial icon
set, which I do not want to maintain separat
Conrad Knauer schrieb:
> The splash screen and Help -> About still say "OpenOffice.org 2.0"
> (which is
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/78489 )
yes, known and addressed.
> The font used in all the menus is fuzzy, making it look like a non-native
> app (I'm guessing its this bug: https://launchpad.n
Pavel Rojtberg schrieb:
> Matthias Klose schrieb:
>> Pavel Rojtberg schrieb:
>>> my point with the icons was:
>>> can we have the tango-icons from the jimmac tango branch?
>> No, not in its current form as a replacement for the well tested
>> industrial_theme
Please could you write down the project idea in a wiki page at wiki.ubuntu.com?
Use the SpecTemplate for the page. If you didn't already apply (see [1]), then
please do so before Mar 26. Evaluation and ranking of the submitted projects
will start next week.
Matthias
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/
Charlotte Curtis schrieb:
> I have used onboard, and it seems to work quite well. In addition to the
> features you have mentioned (popping up as necessary and word prediction) I
> can think of a few other additions, such as a number pad, additional
> language/keyboard configurations, and maybe sh
Krzysztof Lichota schrieb:
> I am looking for mentor in Ubuntu team for my Google Summer of Code idea
> - "Automatic boot and application start file prefetching".
>
> Abstract:
> I would like to concentrate on delivering prefetching solution for
> everyday use by casual users, leveraging prior sol
William Tracy schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> Would Ubuntu have any interest in Project Looking Glass work being
> done for Summer of Code? Looking Glass didn't get accepted for SoC
> this year, though I'm told that the Looking Glass community might
> still be able to find a mentor.
>
> I'm working on a pr
Matt Zimmerman schrieb:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 02:15:31AM -0600, Conrad Knauer wrote:
>> Also, for a little while libwps (very useful for those of us with old
>> word processing docs locked away in that format) was a dependency of
>> openoffice.org but its not anymore... what changed with that?
[ Please ignore this email, if you do not want to develop for the processor
found in the Sony Playstation 3, or other CBE based systems ]
Experimental ppu/spu toolchain packages for Ubuntu are available for the feisty
and gutsy (development) releases.
- The packages for the gutsy release can be
konghao schrieb:
> Release of All-sides Testing Report of Ubuntu-7.04
Is this "pure" 7.04, or are updates taken from the ubuntu-security and/or
ubuntu-updates repositories?
> As a member of Ubuntu community , BSTQC would contribute all the resource we
> have.
It looks like the reports are gener
IcedTea is a temporary fork of OpenJDK which allows building with a free
toolchain and adding/replacing code which is not yet available under a free
license. First deb Packages for amd64, i386 and lpia are available at
deb http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/ubuntu/ gutsy/
deb-src http://people.ubu
Matthias Klose schrieb:
> IcedTea is a temporary fork of OpenJDK which allows building with a free
> toolchain and adding/replacing code which is not yet available under a free
> license. First deb Packages for amd64, i386 and lpia are available at
>
> deb http://people.ubuntu.c
Scott James Remnant schrieb:
> I'd like to make a strawman proposal to be torn apart and burnt as
> necessary: merge main and universe. I will try and explain my
> rationale, and my alternate proposal.
+1
We apparently have difficulties to communicate that this separation was done
only for the s
[sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For packaging we currently use a build dependency on a package which
we did agree for packaging (java-gcj-compat-dev). Now with other more
conformant Java implementations available, we might want to change to
those implementations for building the
his is misleading and
> does not help to become familiar with Ubuntu's own and good fonts.
>
> This was introduced by a patch:
> openoffice.org (2.2.0-0ubuntu1) feisty
> * Use Times/Helvetica as the default font for writer documents (calc and
> impress still pick up the
Ioannis Nousias schrieb:
> is there any chance in seeing LLVM 2.2 version in Hardy (released in
> February)? Current version is 1.8, which I think is from Q4 2006!
Yes, if you do follow our documented procedures.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess
> A request to update the LLVM
41 matches
Mail list logo
