emacs produces 39 matches, and although there are
duplicates and packages which are not directly relevant, most of those
are, and are not subscribed at the moment. (This is a weak heuristic;
there are certainly other packages which are not listed by this simple
recipe, either.)
/* era */
PS. Please
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:08 +0100, "Reinhard Tartler"
wrote:
> ubuntu-el...@eeera.imap.cc writes:
> > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:24 +0200, "Reinhard Tartler"
> > wrote:
> >> "era" writes:
> >> > I cannot figure out how to add more pac
seen a bug report which actually included the byte
compilation logs. I've been meaning to set up a test case to figure out
what went wrong but then if problems from the byte compilation logs are
not obscurely hidden in a temporary file, perhaps it could just be
backed out.
/* era */
--
If t
in a pointer to
a wiki page so perhaps this one could be remodelled accordingly.
Please feel free to update the page if you find something is awkward or
missing!
/* era */
--
If this were a real .signature, it would suck less. Well, maybe not.
_
Quoting DpkgTerminalLog.txt:
> Remove speechd-el for emacs24
> Purging speechd-el byte-compiled files for emacs24...
> rmdir: nie udało się usunąć „/usr/share/emacs24/site-lisp/speechd-el”: Nie ma
> takiego pliku ani katalogu
> ERROR: remove script from speechd-el package failed
> dpkg: error proc
Lintian has a check for this since 2009. I would be tempted to close
the bug against Ubuntu emacs23 but for the time being, I simply marked
it as Confirmed, based on the number of reported (and now fixed) tasks
for other packages.
** Changed in: emacs23 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
*
Oh, the Lintian change is http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=535566
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Lisp, which is subscribed to emacs23 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552954
Title:
"can't find the info directory"
To ma
** Also affects: emacs
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: emacs
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Lisp, which is subscribed to emacs23 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786698
Title:
It seems that either xemacs21 or emacsen-common is broken on your
system. If you still have this problem, can you remove and reinstall
emacsen-common and see if that helps? If removing xemacs21 from your
system altogether is acceptable, try that too.
I am setting the Status of this bug report to
Quoting DpkgTerminalLog.txt:
> Install emacspeak for emacs24
> /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/emacspeak running in /
> install/emacspeak: Handling install for emacsen flavor emacs24
> Temporary log file is /tmp/fileADnAs3
> Byte-compiling (~0.5 min) ...ERROR: install script from emac
Quoting DpkgTerminalLog.txt:
> Install emacspeak for emacs24
> /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/emacspeak running in /
> install/emacspeak: Handling install for emacsen flavor emacs24
> Temporary log file is /tmp/file8n8Fm7
> Byte-compiling (~1.4 min) ...ERROR: install script from emac
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1176473 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1176473
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1058495
package emacs24 24.1+1-2ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: vidinis procesas
installed post-installation script nutrūko gražindamas reikšmę 1
** This bu
Changing to Invalid as per latest reply. It looks like a duplicate of
the existing emacsen-common / xemacs21 bugs but if something new and
interesting comes up, feel free to reopen.
** Changed in: emacs23 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification becaus
I marked this as "affects me too", not because it particularly affects
me, but because it is clearly a code improvement -- provided the locale-
specific format-time-string parameters are substituted with locale-
independent constructs (in particular, %b expands to the locale's
abbreviated month nam
For example, auctex has "Depends: emacs23 | emacs24 | emacs-snapshot" --
I believe precisely to *support* users who want to be able to use emacs-
snapshot instead of one of the regular emacsen, but without forcing
anyone to give up the version they already have. This dependency is
resolved when on
However, the bug is not in emacs23, but in the packages which declare a
dependency on a nonexistent package. I'm marking this as Incomplete
because it needs to be split up into tasks for the packages which need a
change.
("Tasks" are the items which show up on a yellow background at the top
of th
This seems to be caused by a problem in the mu4e package scripts.
Reassigning.
** Package changed: emacs24 (Ubuntu) => maildir-utils (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Lisp, which is subscribed to emacs24 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
As per the latest comment in the upstream bug, this was already fixed in
upstream Emacs 23 in 2011.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Lisp, which is subscribed to emacs23 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697412
Title:
Emacs won't start, co
For what it's worth, here is the actual fix:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=918729edc787e5566f1e2aa1e41346084ec2b164
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Lisp, which is subscribed to emacs23 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
This would have been fixed when Ubuntu synced to Emacs 23.3 but I don't
have an environment where I can test that it is now fixed. Could
somebody please verify that the fix works with Emacs >= 23.3 on Ubuntu
with a font with a name like that?
--
You received this bug notification because you are
This is unreproducible for me. Could you please run the following
command and paste the output here?
emacs -q --batch -eval '(shell-command-to-string "echo foo")'
I am setting the status of this bug report to Incomplete to mark it as
pending on further input from you. It can be changed back to
Trivially reproduced out of the box on emacs24.
era@trvsty:~$ apt-cache policy emacs24
emacs24:
Installed: 24.3+1-2ubuntu1
Candidate: 24.3+1-2ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 24.3+1-2ubuntu1 0
500 http://fi.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg
I see emacs24-dbg in 14.04, does that mean "Fix Released" or am I
missing something here?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Lisp, which is subscribed to emacs24 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1100350
Title:
emacs24 has no dbg package
To
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1278569 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1278569
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1278569
ibus breaks emacs and eclipse control-space keybinding
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Lisp, which i
** Also affects: emacs24 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Lisp, which is subscribed to emacs24 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1251176
Title:
Can't type accented characters anymore: i
I get this on Xubuntu after dist-upgrade from 12.04 to 14.04 and
subsequently installing emacs24.
I can confirm the "XMODIFIERS= emacs" workaround. As in #5, loading
iso-transl does not seem to offer any remedy.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Lisp
LP #575084 seems related.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Lisp, which is subscribed to emacs24 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1251176
Title:
Can't type accented characters anymore: is undefined
To manage notifications about this bug
If I understand your bug report correctly, you are not using emacs24 as
shipped by Ubuntu. Is there something we can fix in Ubuntu or should
this be converted into a question?
New => Incomplete
** Changed in: emacs24 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notifica
Marking as not a bug as suggested by OP's latest comment.
** Changed in: emacs24 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Lisp, which is subscribed to emacs24 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1364381
Title:
bash-completion is not a feature which ships with emacs24. Where did
you obtain this package? You should probably report this bug to them
instead.
If you can suggest something to fix in emacs24 as shipped by Ubuntu,
please update your bug report and change its Status back to New.
Thanks.
** Cha
Looks like https://github.com/szermatt/emacs-bash-completion/issues/5
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Lisp, which is subscribed to emacs24 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1370449
Title:
emacs bash tab-completion doesn't work for command
** Changed in: emacs24 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Lisp, which is subscribed to emacs24 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1100350
Title:
emacs24 has no dbg package
To manage notificatio
Is this still reproducible on 14.04? At least on Xubuntu, I do not see
this behavior.
** Changed in: emacs24 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Lisp, which is subscribed to emacs24 in Ubuntu.
https://bug
Could you please clarify why you are filing this bug against the emacs24
package? Perhaps you mean to address a flaw in some part of the Linux
kernel or possibly the Unity keyboard handling?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Lisp, which is subscribed
** Changed in: emacs24 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Perowansa Paruka (perowansaparuka) => (unassigned)
** Package changed: emacs24 (Ubuntu) => emacs-goodies-el (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Lisp, which is subscribed to emacs24 in Ubuntu.
https
As per attached DpkgTerminalLog.txt, reassigning to dictionaries-common.
Setting up emacs24 (24.4+1-4ubuntu5) ...
Install emacsen-common for emacs24
emacsen-common: Handling install of emacsen flavor emacs24
Wrote /etc/emacs24/site-start.d/00debian-vars.elc
Wrote /usr/share/emacs24/site-lisp/debia
On the off chance that you still have /tmp/elc_21gLxW.log on your
system, could you please attach it here?
Alternatively, if you can reliably reproduce this problem, could you
please examine the dpkg log file and obtain the corresponding tmp file
to attach here after you reproduce the problem?
On
If you still have the file /tmp/elc_rS4Cno.log on your system, could you
please attach it here?
Alternatively, if you are able to reproduce the problem and generate a
similar log file, please examine the dpkg log file to obtain the file
name of the generated temporary file, and attach that here in
Closing as "Invalid", as there is nothing Ubuntu can do if users install
third-party utilities which replace or shadow crucial system binaries.
** Changed in: emacs24 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Summary changed:
- package emacs24 24.3+1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: sub-proce
I don't think there is anything in the standard install which would set
TERM to eterm-color. Do you have personal initialization files which
override the system TERM? How is Emacs connected to your display and
keyboard (Unity, Gnome, bare Linux terminal ...?)
(Tempted to set this to status: "Inc
** Summary changed:
- Emacs converts ascii files to unmutable images
+ .doc file name mapping should be more careful
** Description changed:
+ It is not uncommon for *.doc files to contain plain ASCII text. In this
+ case, the default behavior of Emacs is less than ideal, as described in
+ more
Forwarded upstream. Launchpad *still* won't let me link to the GNU
Emacs bug tracker. http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=20891
** Also affects: emacs
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Lisp, which
Reassigning to linux as per OP's stated intent.
** Package changed: emacs24 (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Lisp, which is subscribed to emacs24 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1468283
Title:
Wrong Escape Seq
Upstream fixed this in 24.3 and we are on 24.4 already. Marking as Fix
Released. Please reopen if you see a regression. Thanks.
** Changed in: emacs24 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Lisp, which i
As per diagnostics in comment #3, added a task for overlay-scrollbar.
For background, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Ayatana/ScrollBars has comments
regarding the blacklist towards the end of the page (but if previous
history is any indication, the link will be broken by the time you try
to click).
** Al
As previous comments indicate that this should be fixed in 24.3, can we
close this bug now?
Marking as Incomplete, which means the bug will expire in 60 days unless
you follow up to indicate that you still have a problem (or, of course,
feel free to mark as Fix Released if it's indeed fixed).
**
So you are running the GUI version of Emacs, running in Unity? You
start it from the Unity menu (emacs.desktop)?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Lisp, which is subscribed to emacs24 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1285864
Title:
Missin
Thanks for the quick reply! And sorry to see that this bug was left
lingering for so long.
** Changed in: emacs24 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Lisp, which is subscribed to emacs24 in Ubuntu.
htt
I can confirm that M-x xterm in emacs24 sets TERM to eterm-color when
launched out of the box on Ubuntu 15.04. (In the regular terminal, it's
simply xterm.)
Whether this should be fixed in the packaging (make it not set eterm-
color) or dependencies (pull in ncurses-term) is an open question,
thou
As of the current Emacs sources, https://github.com/emacs-
mirror/emacs/blob/master/lisp/term.el#L1472 contains
(defvar term-term-name "eterm-color"
so there really is an explicit setting in the upstream sources which
hardcodes this. With that, I guess I agree that emacs24 should
"Suggests: nc
(Sorry, where I wrote xterm, I meant M-x term!)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Lisp, which is subscribed to emacs24 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1285864
Title:
Missing dependency: emacs does not pull any package providing
/usr/sha
Forwarded upstream; https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790402
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #790402
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790402
** Also affects: emacs24 (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790402
Importance: U
"Confirmed" flag was lost in the ping-pong when the tag was moved from
unity (Ubuntu) -> hud (Ubuntu) and promptly there flagged as Invalid.
If the hud owner's comment is correct, the unity task is the one where
it should remain Confirmed.
** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confir
Please update the bug description to explain the problem that this patch
is supposed to fix, and explain why it should be applied to Ubuntu and
not to Debian.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Lisp, which is subscribed to emacs-goodies-el in Ubuntu.
ht
Closing for lack of feedback. If anything can be reopened, please
provide enough details to triage. Thanks in advance.
** Changed in: emacs-goodies-el (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: emacs-snapshot (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this b
** Also affects: emacs-goodies-el via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=803728
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** No longer affects: emacs-goodies-el
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Lisp, which is subscribed to emacs-
vm-bonus was removed in 35.11 so marking this as "Fix Released" (or
should it be "Invalid" because it cannot be reproduced anymore?)
** Changed in: emacs-goodies-el (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Li
I updated the bug description. Please review and maybe add something to
reflect the additional changes in your latest update of the patch.
** Description changed:
- Patch will be attached to this bug report.
+ minibuf-electric.el contains some code which is not compatible with
+ Emacs 24. The a
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #803767
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=803767
** Also affects: emacs-goodies-el via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=803767
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because y
I tried to reproduce this in 15.10 but couldn't. Which precise packages
are involved here? "purge emacs" alone should do nothing much at all,
whereas "apt-get purge emacs24-nox" produces something a little bit
closer to what you are reporting. What versions of emacs24* and apel
did you have inst
Also, can you attach /tmp/elc.cuyUS7lLWUqb or reproduce the bug and
generate a new similar file for inclusion here?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Lisp, which is subscribed to emacs24 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512986
Title:
pack
http://askubuntu.com/questions/698033/wubi-global-name-sig-is-not-
defined suggests this may be a Wubi problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Lisp, which is subscribed to emacs24 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545974
Title:
Global n
How is this related to emacs24?
Could you please copy/paste or transcribe the error output so that we
can troubleshoot this? See http://askubuntu.com/questions/425809/where-
are-the-logs-for-apt-get for where to look for various possibly
pertinent logs.
Setting the bug status to Incomplete; it c
The pertinent snippet out of the attached DpkgTerminalLog.txt seems to
be this.
Configurando emacs24 (24.5+1-6ubuntu1) ...
Install emacsen-common for emacs24
emacsen-common: Handling install of emacsen flavor emacs24
emacs24: relocation error: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libboost_system.so.1.58.0:
** Summary changed:
- package emacs24-lucid 24.5+1-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
+ package emacs24-lucid 24.5+1-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: libgif.so.4:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or direct
Closing as user error. You are not supposed to manipulate the system
files directly.
** Changed in: emacs24 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Lisp, which is subscribed to emacs24 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
Unsure if this is an Emacs error or a user configuration error. If you
can follow up with information about how and where vietnamese-tcvn-unix
gets configured in, it might help us reproduce and ultimately hopefully
resolve this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
>From the end of the attached DpkgTerminalLog.txt:
Install emacsen-common for emacs24
emacsen-common: Handling install of emacsen flavor emacs24
Unsuitable coding system for keyboard: vietnamese-tcvn-unix
ERROR: install script from emacsen-common package failed
dpkg: gặp lỗi khi đang xử lý gói ema
>From the attached DpkgTerminalLog.txt:
In toplevel form:
oneliner.el:225:1:Error: Cannot open load file: datei oder Verzeichnis nicht
gefunden, poe
ERROR: install script from oneliner-el package failed
dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten des Paketes emacs24 (--configure):
Unterprozess installiertes po
Did you ever attempt to report this upstream? Does the bug exist in a
recent emacs-snapshot? If so, we should probably forward this to the
Emacs maintainers rather than have it linger here.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Lisp, which is subscribed
Marine Cannard it seems unlikely that your problem is related to this
bug, unless you were specifically upgrading from Ubuntu 12 to Ubuntu 14.
If I were you, I would submit a separate bug report so we get to examine
your log files etc.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
Furthermore, this seems to have been caused by xemacs21 which I believe
is no longer supported on Ubuntu.
Setting up emacsen-common (2.0.7) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/emacs/site-start.el ...
Install emacsen-common for xemacs21
emacsen-common: Handling install of emacsen flavor
See also https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xemacs21/+bug/789706
although I am hesitant to mark this as a duplicate.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Emacs Lisp, which is subscribed to emacsen-common in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1368071
't really use
Ubuntu any longer and there hasn't been a lot of bug triage coordination
on this list anyway. Thanks for the company through these years!
/* era */
--
If this were a real .signature, it would suck less. Well, maybe not.
_
The tail of DpkgTerminalLog.gz indicates a problem in ocaml-mode
actually (see below). Reassigning.
As a workaround, try temporarily uninstalling this package - maybe it
can be reinstalled after your Emacs upgrade is complete.
There are many other unrelated errors in this file; maybe you'll want
Upstream is now (finally!) closed as Wontfix, but the rationale is that
other code paths have been updated to provide a useful warning (if I am
reading this correctly). Updating Package: from emacs22 (sic) to emacs25
and setting status to Fix committed.
** Package changed: emacs22 (Ubuntu) => emac
ions /
opinions?
/* era */
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-elisp
Post to : ubuntu-elisp@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-elisp
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
(Apologies for using a webmail client which sucks ...)
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:38 +0300, "era"
wrote:
> Following up on a thread from yesteryear (and then some), I would like
> to suggest that maybe the byte compilation logs should not be saved in
> a temp file at all
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/emacs23/+bug/725988
This bug is marked as "Fix Released" but the fix is apparently
erroneous. I cannot change the status to New or Confirmed. I don't
know what it takes to change it. Should a new bug report be submitted?
/* era */
--
ght place for your
report. Some general guidance is in the wiki at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingEmacs
/* era */
--
If this were a real .signature, it would suck less. Well, maybe not.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-elisp
Post to
80 matches
Mail list logo
