Re: Guidelines for reviewing new packages.

2007-11-12 Thread Justin Dugger
On Nov 12, 2007 9:33 PM, Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:13:45 -0600 "Justin Dugger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >It sounds like it sort of solves much of both problems. > > I'm not sure what you mean. I think it makes patch systems even more > critical becau

Re: Guidelines for reviewing new packages.

2007-11-12 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:13:45 -0600 "Justin Dugger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Nov 12, 2007 4:34 PM, Emmet Hikory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Emmet Hikory wrote: >> 1: http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/dpatch_dbs_etc_etc_etc_etc_considered_harmful/ > >On a longer term basis, did any progre

Re: Guidelines for reviewing new packages.

2007-11-12 Thread Barry deFreese
Justin Dugger wrote: > On Nov 12, 2007 4:34 PM, Emmet Hikory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Emmet Hikory wrote: >> 1: >> http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/dpatch_dbs_etc_etc_etc_etc_considered_harmful/ >> > > On a longer term basis, did any progress come out of UDS-Boston on > moving

Re: Guidelines for reviewing new packages.

2007-11-12 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:30:16 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Emmet Hikory wrote: >> Reviewers and Packagers, >> >> At the recent MOTU Meeting, a set of guidelines for new package >> review was reviewed. This list is meant to supplement reviewers base >> opinions when

Re: Guidelines for reviewing new packages.

2007-11-12 Thread Justin Dugger
On Nov 12, 2007 4:34 PM, Emmet Hikory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Emmet Hikory wrote: > 1: > http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/dpatch_dbs_etc_etc_etc_etc_considered_harmful/ On a longer term basis, did any progress come out of UDS-Boston on moving the entire archive in bazaar? It sounds like i

Long-standing bugs needing MOTU sponsorship (and the lack thereof)

2007-11-12 Thread Emmet Hikory
In the last MOTU meeting it was discussed that older SRU bugs were not getting sponsored as quickly as would be preferred, and there was general agreement that bugs in queue for more than one week should be announced to the mailing list seeking sponsorship. Since then, Luca Falavigna has joine

Re: Guidelines for reviewing new packages.

2007-11-12 Thread Emmet Hikory
Emmet Hikory wrote: > At the recent MOTU Meeting, a set of guidelines for new package > review was reviewed. This list is meant to supplement reviewers base > opinions when reviewing packages, and provide for a relatively stable > set of criteria when packagers are deciding if their packages s

noteedit crashes after printing

2007-11-12 Thread rd
I use ubuntu 7.10 with gnome. installed are: noteedit lilypond timidity kdebase using noteedit I can import midi and print. But after printing noteedit crashes. Please have a look at the following lines, I could extract. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ noteedit kbuildsycoca running... DCOP Cleaning up dea

Re: Guidelines for reviewing new packages.

2007-11-12 Thread Stefan Potyra
Hi, Am Montag 12 November 2007 20:38:19 schrieb Jeffrey Ratcliffe: > On 12/11/2007, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > 4b. Contents of diff.gz should be in debian/. i.e. no inline > > patching. > > Absolutely. Especially if there are patches on patches, anything else > makes things really ha

Re: Guidelines for reviewing new packages.

2007-11-12 Thread Jeffrey Ratcliffe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/11/2007, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > 4b. Contents of diff.gz should be in debian/. i.e. no inline patching. Absolutely. Especially if there are patches on patches, anything else makes things really hard for anybody to follow. Regards

Re: Guidelines for reviewing new packages.

2007-11-12 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Emmet Hikory wrote: > Reviewers and Packagers, > > At the recent MOTU Meeting, a set of guidelines for new package > review was reviewed. This list is meant to supplement reviewers base > opinions when reviewing packages, and provide for a relatively stable > set of criteria when packagers ar

tesseract

2007-11-12 Thread Jeffrey Ratcliffe
tesseract 2.01 has now been uploaded to Debian and is sitting in the NEW queue (http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html). Therefore, would some kind soul please remove it from REVU? As soon as it has hit unstable, I will file a request to sync. Regards Jeff -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu

Re: Luca Falavigna is a MOTU

2007-11-12 Thread Luca Falavigna
Daniel Holbach ha scritto: > Hello everybody, > > having contributed myriads of fixes and updates through the MOTU team, > Luca Falavigna (dktrkranz) became MOTU himself. Congratulations! > > Everybody please welcome Luca to the team! What a surprise! Thanks everybody for your support so far, re

Re: Luca Falavigna is a MOTU

2007-11-12 Thread Marco Rodrigues
Daniel Holbach wrote: > Hello everybody, > > having contributed myriads of fixes and updates through the MOTU team, > Luca Falavigna (dktrkranz) became MOTU himself. Congratulations! > > Everybody please welcome Luca to the team! > > Have a nice day, > Daniel > > Welcome Luca! :-) Keep up