On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 04:15:32PM +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> reading the StableReleaseUpdates, I understand that I need to target
> saucy-proposed right ? even if my package is from univers.
Correct. Nowadays you can just target saucy too and it'll automatically
redirect it to -propo
Thanks
now juste question
reading the StableReleaseUpdates, I understand that I need to target
saucy-proposed right ? even if my package is from univers.
the changelog version with the problem is: 8.0.5+dfsg-3
what is the version expected for this saucy update.
thanks
frederic
--
Ubuntu-mot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi MOTU,
The following bug [0] was recently fixed though Debian in version
0.8.6-2 of the GNS3 package. This has has successfully been imported
into Trusty, but the bug was first reported in 13.04 (Raring), so is
still present in 13.10 (Saucy).
When
On 13 November 2013 09:25, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
wrote:
>> Perhaps something changed about how dpkg-buildflags parses the option
>> and it became more pedantic, or perhaps it wasn't providing that flag
>> previously?
>
> maybe in fact it is saner like this.
>
>> It seems to work for me.
>
> I as
On 13.11.2013 10:39, George Merkel wrote:
> Man do you guys ever give this shit arest
Please stop this kind of language on the mailing list. Feel free to
unsubscribe if you are not interested in the technical discussions on here.
Daniel
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
> Perhaps something changed about how dpkg-buildflags parses the option
> and it became more pedantic, or perhaps it wasn't providing that flag
> previously?
maybe in fact it is saner like this.
> It seems to work for me.
I asked the upstream to double check this.
> Sure, and thank you for cons
Man do you guys ever give this shit arest
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 13, 2013, at 4:34 AM, "Robie Basak" wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 09:25:48AM +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
>> In fact I do not have an ubuntu machine myself (I have a very old laptop),
>> do you have some ubun
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 09:25:48AM +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> In fact I do not have an ubuntu machine myself (I have a very old laptop), do
> you have some ubuntu port machine available for DD ?
> so I should prepare a package on it ?.
I think you can create Ubuntu chroots on a Debia
>export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_STRIP = -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions
This is trange because this was not a problem until recently...
I will do the change and see if it works.
thanks a lot
now my question is , is it possible to fix 13.10 once I fixed my package ?
thanks
Fred
--
Ubuntu-motu mail
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 09:02:51AM +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> >export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_STRIP = -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions
>
> This is trange because this was not a problem until recently...
Perhaps something changed about how dpkg-buildflags parses the option
and it became mor
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 07:47:16AM +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> So I put in the debian/rules file this line:
>
> export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_STRIP="-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions"
Remember that this is Makefile syntax, not shell. You want:
export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_STRIP = -Wl,-Bsymboli
Hello,
I received a bug report about one of our users [3], explaining that my package
(tango) is not working on ubuntu. (13.10).
Indeed this software does not work if it was compiled with this LDFLAGS
"-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions"
So I put in the debian/rules file this line:
export DEB_LDFLAGS_MA
12 matches
Mail list logo