On Thursday 14 February 2008 12:05, Scott Kitterman wrote:
We no longer have upstream version freeze, we have feature freeze, so I
wonder about upstream releases that just have bug fixes. IIRC when the new
freeze structure was created there was some discussion about this.
Speaking for myself
Would help if i sent it from a subscribed address, too...
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:42:57 +1100, Hobbsee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:05:18 -0500, Scott Kitterman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Up through Alpha 6, if a MOTU believes upload of a new upstream release
that just has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Emmet Hikory schrieb:
I'd like to see discussion of the motu-release freeze policy
internal to MOTU release and presented for review at the MOTU Meeting
this Friday, just to ensure that the entire team is comfortable with a
plan, rather than
Hi Scott,
Scott Kitterman wrote:
We no longer have upstream version freeze, we have feature freeze, so I
wonder
about upstream releases that just have bug fixes. IIRC when the new freeze
structure was created there was some discussion about this.
Speaking for myself (not as part of
Scott Kitterman proposed:
Up through Alpha 6, if a MOTU believes upload of a new upstream release that
just has bug fixes in it is warranted, they may upload it. File a bug in LP
with the upstream change log entries in it and mark it fix released when the
upload is done to document that
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, 14. Februar 2008 18:05 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
We no longer have upstream version freeze, we have feature freeze, so I
wonder about upstream releases that just have bug fixes. IIRC when the new
freeze structure was created there was some discussion about this.
Speaking
Stephan Hermann wrote:
That's how I see it, too. If a new upstream fixes serious bugs, we
should bring it in...(not forgetting the paperwork and an ack from
motu-release)
I think you misread his proposal. There's no need for an ACK from motu-release
if the new release is bug-fix only. That's
On Thursday 14 February 2008 15:43, Michael Bienia wrote:
On 2008-02-14 12:05:18 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Up through Alpha 6, if a MOTU believes upload of a new upstream release
that just has bug fixes in it is warranted, they may upload it. File a
bug in LP with the upstream change
On 2008-02-14 12:05:18 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Up through Alpha 6, if a MOTU believes upload of a new upstream release that
just has bug fixes in it is warranted, they may upload it. File a bug in LP
with the upstream change log entries in it and mark it fix released when the
upload
On 2008-02-14 22:11:29 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Another option I'm thinking which would be in the middle of having to do some
paperwork when it shouldn't be necessary and not thinking about it or not
checking it is to listen all the changes from upstream NEWS or ChangeLog (if
the
Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Thursday 14 February 2008 15:43, Michael Bienia wrote:
On 2008-02-14 12:05:18 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Up through Alpha 6, if a MOTU believes upload of a new upstream release
that just has bug fixes in it is warranted, they may upload it. File a
bug in LP with
Michael Bienia wrote:
On 2008-02-14 22:11:29 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Another option I'm thinking which would be in the middle of having to do some
paperwork when it shouldn't be necessary and not thinking about it or not
checking it is to listen all the changes from upstream NEWS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 04:05:18AM EST, Scott Kitterman wrote:
We no longer have upstream version freeze, we have feature freeze, so I
wonder
about upstream releases that just have bug fixes. IIRC when the new freeze
structure was created
Hi,
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Stephan Hermann wrote:
That's how I see it, too. If a new upstream fixes serious bugs, we
should bring it in...(not forgetting the paperwork and an ack from
motu-release)
I think you misread his proposal. There's no need for an ACK from motu-release
if
Stephan Hermann wrote:
Hi,
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Stephan Hermann wrote:
That's how I see it, too. If a new upstream fixes serious bugs, we
should bring it in...(not forgetting the paperwork and an ack from
motu-release)
I think you misread his proposal. There's no need for an ACK
Good Morning,
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Stephan Hermann wrote:
Hi,
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Stephan Hermann wrote:
That's how I see it, too. If a new upstream fixes serious bugs, we
should bring it in...(not forgetting the paperwork and an ack from
motu-release)
I think you
16 matches
Mail list logo
