On Saturday 21 June 2008 15:01, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Saturday 21 June 2008 14:00, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Scott Kitterman ha scritto:
My suggestion would be put it in backports first and get backports
users to test it. Document success and then we can see about copying
it to
On Sunday 22 June 2008, Scott Kitterman wrote:
[...]
| Wine 1.0 is available in hardy-backports. Please test:
IT BROKE EVERYTHING!
By broke, I mean it is now running my IE 7 without locking up, so that is
obviously broken, as you shouldn't be able to run IE on Linux :P
Working great for what
As of Tuesday, Wine made its first release, 1.0.
Unlike most Wine releases, 1.0 came after a 6 week code freeze and a lot
of regression testing. Over 100 bugs have been closed on Wine's
bugzilla, and about 10 or so on launchpad are solved by Wine 1.0 (eg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236589,
My suggestion would be put it in backports first and get backports users to
test it. Document success and then we can see about copying it to updates.
Scott K
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott Kitterman ha scritto:
My suggestion would be put it in backports first and get backports users to
test it. Document success and then we can see about copying it to updates.
I agree. Even if it's a stable release, we need a careful testing
On Saturday 21 June 2008 14:00, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Scott Kitterman ha scritto:
My suggestion would be put it in backports first and get backports users
to test it. Document success and then we can see about copying it to
updates.
I agree. Even if it's a stable release, we need a
