This conversation is hilarious.
People in a team that calls itself the "Quality Assurance" team, debating
how (or whether?) to link bugs to the 100papercuts project, and in the
meantime thousands of people are upgrading Ubuntu to a new release which
apparently will just brick their computer
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 05:45:35PM +0100, floccul...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
> On 26/04/16 17:01, Brian Murray wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 03:50:09PM +0100, floccul...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
> >>On 26/04/16 15:36, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
> >>>...
> >>No.
> >>
> >>This is not about bug importance at
On 26/04/16 20:19, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
Flocculant:
our tracker isn't able to differentiate between packages/projects on a
bug afaik.
If you search for bugs in Ubuntu, the only settings Launchpad will
take into account are those in the package itself.
The settings in the papercuts
On 26/04/16 17:01, Brian Murray wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 03:50:09PM +0100, floccul...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
On 26/04/16 15:36, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
...
No.
This is not about bug importance at all.
That is a different issue.
What I am saying is that adding HundredPaperCuts - then
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 03:50:09PM +0100, floccul...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
> On 26/04/16 15:36, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
> >Flocculant:
> >>Is this why you have never responded to Xubuntu bugs?
> >
> >Yes, as I informed Pasi Lallinaho.
> >
> >
> >Flocculant:
> >> We track bug status - and as the
Alberto Salvia Novella:
Do you mean papercuts could be better tracked using a tag?
There is a problem with that. One purpose of the papercuts project is to
train incomers in quality assurance. And having a separate project for
that allows people setting bug statuses and importances without
On 26/04/16 16:35, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
Flocculant:
> Why add HundredPaperCuts in the first place?
Do you mean papercuts could be better tracked using a tag?
Perhaps - not sure how that would affect that project though.
My interest here lies in the issue it causes us when it's
Flocculant:
> Why add HundredPaperCuts in the first place?
Do you mean papercuts could be better tracked using a tag?
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
On 26/04/16 15:36, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
Flocculant:
Is this why you have never responded to Xubuntu bugs?
Yes, as I informed Pasi Lallinaho.
Flocculant:
> We track bug status - and as the Hundred status never changes this
> causes us problems.
Setting importance is not because the
Flocculant:
Is this why you have never responded to Xubuntu bugs?
Yes, as I informed Pasi Lallinaho.
Flocculant:
> We track bug status - and as the Hundred status never changes this
> causes us problems.
Setting importance is not because the Papercuts project, but for
debugging Ubuntu
On 26/04/16 14:21, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
Brian Murray:
I'd comment in the bug but since you aren't subscribed to it.
Thanks Brian.
I work in thousands of bug reports, so I do not usually subscribe to
them because my email will be flooded by tons of messages from them.
...
Is
11 matches
Mail list logo
