Re: New Official Flavor Process Issues (Was Re: Ubuntu Cinnamon Remix packages)

2022-07-28 Thread eeickmeyer
On Thu, 2022-07-28 at 08:35 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 9:22 PM wrote: > > > > Hi Steve, > > > > Your reply brings up a larger discussion which involves not only > > the > > technical board, but also the community council since there are > > community implications that

Re: New Official Flavor Process Issues (Was Re: Ubuntu Cinnamon Remix packages)

2022-07-28 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 9:55 AM wrote: > This most certainly is not a hasty escalation. I've been aware of > Ubuntu Cinnamon Remix for 3 years and in that time, Joshua's intention > was to make it an official flavor. They have been encouraged to become > an official flavor since Day 0. The

Re: New Official Flavor Process Issues (Was Re: Ubuntu Cinnamon Remix packages)

2022-07-28 Thread eeickmeyer
On Thu, 2022-07-28 at 17:14 -0400, Thomas Ward wrote: > So in the TB's defense, this should not have been so rapidly brought > up as a "CC problem" as Erich alone raised it as such, and is now > operating with the CC hat **without** quorate decision that this > needs CC attention. >   That is

Re: New Official Flavor Process Issues (Was Re: Ubuntu Cinnamon Remix packages)

2022-07-28 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 3:52 PM Joshua Peisach wrote: > Jeremy, > > UCR has been around for 3 years. Plan since day 0, when I went on discourse > and brought up the idea was flavor. > > There have been reasons I've been so hesitant to reach out - these dang > barriers. Again, for you and

Re: New Official Flavor Process Issues (Was Re: Ubuntu Cinnamon Remix packages)

2022-07-28 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 9:22 PM wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > Your reply brings up a larger discussion which involves not only the > technical board, but also the community council since there are > community implications that need to be addressed as the wiki entry you > referred to is not at all