On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:06:14AM -0700, Michael Casadevall wrote:
>
> Milestones exist to give the Ubuntu developer community to step back,
> and check to make sure nothing important has broken, and to gauge our
> progress through a cycle. In addition, they provide a dedicated time
> where as a
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 06:59:34PM -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
> I just wanted to point out that if an SRU needs to be copied to
> -security, assuming the SRU team member has upload rights for the
> package, it should appear in UNAPPROVED and then an Ubuntu Security
> member or an Archive Admin can
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 09:37:49PM -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
> On 09/01/2012 05:50 AM, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> >
> > * the libreoffice update from yesterday failed to build on amd64, we
> > uploaded a fixed version, Bjoern described the issue we had with
> > testing in the changelog (basically
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 04:29:09PM +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
>
> It seems like it would be a good time to resume weekly summary
> emails and meeting ... is that planned? What do others think?
I think there's absolutely value in the summaries to the list
continuing, but opinions seemed to be
volved in our usual Plus One Maintenance rotations again
and, as such, I've put together the roster for this cycle:
[December]
Adam Conrad
Andy Whitcroft
Tim Gardner
[January]
Adam Conrad
Chris Arges
Micah Gersten
[February]
Adam Conrad
Matthias Klose
Michael Still
[March]
Adam Conrad
Colin Wa
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 01:19:43AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, it was only after I copied it that I noticed that all three
> of these bugs were for feature backports that don't meet SRU criteria:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-django/+bug/1081388
> https
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 06:09:04AM -0700, Adam Conrad wrote:
>
> After much faffing about with new tools and infrastructure, we're
> confident that we're ready to kick the tires on this and get more
> people involved in our usual Plus One Maintenance rotations again
&g
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 12:11:51PM -0500, Stéphane Graber wrote:
>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/RaringRingtail/ReleaseTaskSignup is pretty
> desperately empty at the moment, so it'd be great if some of the release
> team members and cdimage team members could sign-up for the upcoming
> milestones.
I
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 01:07:19AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> As a further update, I've removed precise/quantal SRUs for walinuxagent
> tonight due to private bug references in debian/changelog. One of these had
> been accepted by the same individual.
As the guy who accepted the precise
So, we're well into the Raring cycle, and we've not been seeing much in
the way of team status reports. It was decided at UDS that we'd drop
the weekly meetings, but maintain sending reports to the list, so people
could keep track of what other teams were up to and effectively raise
concerns.
I'd
Hey guys, just letting you know that I reverted the recent seed
change and language-selector upload, as the im-config transition
is going to need an MIR.
I suspect that im-config itself will only need a cursory review,
but please do file an MIR and get it done properly. It also
pulls in a new dep
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 12:31:40PM +0100, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
> >
> > I suspect that im-config itself will only need a cursory review, but
> > please do file an MIR and get it done properly. It also pulls in a
> > new dep (dialog), which will need an MIR filed for it as well.
> > Please don
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 03:03:04PM +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
>
> And I'll take care to double check the versioning again hereafter.
>
> I apologize again that this was purely accidental.
This has nothing to do with versioning, but rather that lintian shouldn't
be in extras AT ALL (and no p
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 04:46:36PM +0100, Daniel Holbach wrote:
>
> I just had a look at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SReleaseSchedule and it
> seems like the relevant parts of it were written in September 2011.
Right, this was pretty much just a template carried forward, I should
go fill it in with a
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:58:35AM +0100, Ara Pulido wrote:
>
> April 2013 is going to see 3 releases reaching EOL:
>
> - Hardy for Server
> - Lucid for Desktop
> - Oneiric for Server,Desktop
>
> Is the definitive date already set up?
Yeah, I'm going for April 25 + 2 weeks for all of them (d
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 01:34:22PM -0400, Stéphane Graber wrote:
>
> Now with the migration blocks that can be put in place in britney, it's
> my opinion that we don't need to freeze the whole archive nearly that
> early and so can save some time to the release team by not having nearly
> as much
, and will be reviewed
and accepted promptly. Please help us make this another smooth and
polished Ubuntu release, and thanks in advance for all the hard work
in that direction.
On behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team,
Adam Conrad
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
M
Earlier today, Pete put up the skeleton for the release task
signup for saucy. It would be lovely if people jumped in and
started filling out tasks they're willing to volunteer for.
During the milestones that Ubuntu isn't participating in, I
would love to see community folk (Scott, Jonathan, Jona
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 03:15:14PM -0700, Pete Graner wrote:
>
> For the wiki/URL challenged the link is:
>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/ReleaseTaskSignup
Bah, I was totally using that as a minimum skills check.
Or I may have forgotten to mention it in the email.
Or both. *cough*
Some may have already noticed, and others will soon notice that queue
rejections now require a comment. This is enforced not at the API
level but at the tool/UI level. Please update your local branches of
ubuntu-archive-tools to get the new shiny.
There are three (currently) UIs that take advant
At vUDS, we discussed a few release schedule changes for Saucy, based
on the fact that the original schedule was copied from a template and
could do with some tweaking. Yesterday, on IRC, we discussed this
further to make sure everyone was on the same page, and the following
changes have been appl
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 07:48:10PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> Would it be possible to support force-autopkgtest on either the package under
> test or the triggering package. Then, for today's case, we could have done:
>
> force-autopkgtest kde-baseapps/4:4.10.80-0ubuntu1
>
> That would
We're currently assuming that everyone who participated in Saucy
Alpha 1 is also participating in Alpha 2. If this is not true,
now would be a good time to speak up.
ScottK: If you'd like to push the massive britney block of doom,
please do.
Everyone Else: When you want your dailies turned off i
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:57:30AM +0100, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> If no one says anything to the contrary, I'll adjust the build scripts at
> the end of the week to drop Ubuntu powerpc.
Given the lack of new PowerPC desktop hardware, my personal interest
with my community hat on is in Ubuntu Se
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 09:36:49AM +1000, Jackson Doak wrote:
> The iso tracker says the current version of the netboot iso is
> ubuntu257, this however, doesn't exist on the archive, as can be seen
> at
> http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/saucy/main/installer-amd64/20101020ubuntu257/images/
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 04:06:26AM +0100, Phill Whiteside wrote:
>
> the netboot ISO's are a peculiar build, in that they arrive from debian
> until we go debian-freeze. As and when they arrive, it does take a little
> while for the ubuntu system to catch upColin can explain this in much
> mor
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:31:22PM -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
>
> gnumeric to 1.12.6 and goffice to 0.10.6
> numerous bug fixes and very few features (only in gnumeric)
> http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gnumeric/1.12/gnumeric-1.12.5.news
> http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gnumeric/1.
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 08:58:49AM -0500, Ted Gould wrote:
>
> I understand your concern about bringing in additional packages onto the
> desktop image. What I don't agree with is removing the feature from
> indicator-power instead of figuring out the issues with all of those
> packages being bro
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 11:17:48PM -0500, Ted Gould wrote:
>
> Requires: Things will break if you don't have it
Depends is pretty much a hard requirement, yes, and fairly easy to
sort out at both the application and library level based on linking,
unconditional forking, etc.
> Recommands: Eh, th
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 06:30:17PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-touch-release-team is 404 for me. What's the
> URL for the team?
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-touch-release
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or un
This topic has come up several times since we lost upstream support for
the proprietary drivers on the OMAP4 SoC, and after the last time it
did, we (to be precise, Steve Langasek and I) came to the conclusion
that maintaining the Quantal kernel past EOL, a backported X stack, and
a binary driver w
p://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-announce
On behalf of the entire Ubuntu Release Team,
Adam Conrad
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
[ This is a shameless copy-and-paste from last year ]
For the timezone challenged, as of 2100UTC today, the archive is
officially fozen in preparation of release candidates and the
final release of Saucy Salamander in a week. This is three
hours from the time I hit send on this email.
Uploads fr
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 06:40:16PM -0400, Braiam Miguel Peguero Novo wrote:
>
> In askubuntu chat we noticed certain oddity in the support releases,
> Quantal will be still supported while Raring isn't, hence people using
> Quantal that wants to upgrade to Raring can (Murphy's law say will)
> get
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 05:17:56PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> For the Alphas, I think Tuesday is fine.
+1 to putting migration blocks in place on Tuesday. Should give
people enough time to get their ducks in a row to build a workable
image on Wednesday and ship it on Thursday.
... Adam
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 10:44:33PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> Since this package is in unstable only, I agree that it should not be
> included in Ubuntu. I've removed the package from trusty now and
> blacklisted it so that future versions are not synced from Debian
> (https://bugs.launchpa
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 08:00:12AM -0800, Leann Ogasawara wrote:
>
> With 12.04.4 having just released, I wanted to propose the idea of having a
> 12.04.5 point release for Precise.
FWIW, I think the engineering burden for doing this is worth the trade
off for it being The Right Thing To Do.
...
er that, leads are on their own for spins via the tracker.
On behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team,
Adam Conrad
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
ntu announcements, please subscribe to Ubuntu's
very low volume announcement list at:
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-announce
On behalf of the entire Ubuntu Release Team,
Adam Conrad
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe
works and then promptly
forget about for two years because it's just that awesome. At least,
it should be. So, if it's not, let's make sure we sort that out.
On behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team,
... Adam Conrad
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Mod
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:07:22PM -0400, Chuck Short wrote:
>
> As you are probably aware OpenStack Icehouse will be released on the same day
> as Ubuntu 14.04. As we did for 13.10, we are intending to do a 0-day SRU for
> OpenStack on the assumption that upstream releases to late to make the r
So, I whipped up a draft utopic release schedule at:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UtopicUnicorn/ReleaseSchedule
It'll look pretty familiar to most, as being nearly identical to the
13.10 schedule, but with a few bits shuffled to match what we did
in 14.04, and with an extra week added to get us back o
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 05:19:17PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
>
> If you want specific things added (like, say, vUDS[1], some important
> community summit/sprint for Flavour X, etc), also let me know.
Okay, so I have vUDS dates on there now. Which looks silly being two
we
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:03:14AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Lallement wrote:
>
> 14.04.1 [2] and 14.10 Alpha2 are the same week (W14 - July 24th)
> it'll be difficult for flavours that participate to both milestones
> to cover them simultaneously.
Right, so I don't think it's sane to move the point r
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 09:02:16AM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
>
> I'll make that change shortly.
A happy accident here is that it also puts all the milestones at the
end of their respective month. Does this mean that flavours might
be happy enough using the 14.06, 14.07 etc miles
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 12:04:43PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> FeatureDefinitionFreeze is an important point of the cycle. Trying to
> finalize blueprints /before/ vUDS isn't particularly helpful; and while it's
> suboptimal to have vUDS this late in the cycle, I think it's best to move
> FD
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 05:19:17PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
> So, I whipped up a draft utopic release schedule at:
>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UtopicUnicorn/ReleaseSchedule
And one event conflict that's been pointed out repeatedly to me now is
that Linux Plumbers is happening o
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 04:04:08PM -0700, Patricia Gaughen wrote:
> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Adam Conrad wrote:
> >
> > If no one objects strenuously to this, I'll move release, and most of
> > the freeze bits leading up to it one week later.
>
> So, I s
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 12:00:23AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> Will phone RTM dates be better aligned with the Ubuntu development schedule
> in
> the future?
I believe this is meant to be a one-off, as the base phone product is
still heavily in development. In the future, a new device sh
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-announce
On behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team,
... Adam Conrad
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
As of nowish, Feature Freeze is in effect for utopic (14.10), leading
up to the release in October.
Don't fret if you have One Last Feature to get uploaded, and don't
panic and upload it untested today just to try to beat the clock. We
would rather see a feature freeze exception bug and a well-te
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:03:46AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Thursday, August 28, 2014 02:07:54 Iain Lane wrote:
> > I didn't see a big touch feature freeze exception this time.
> >
> > Is there one or is someone planning to request one?
>
> Considering Phone is close to RTM, wouldn't no
ghunting on our push from here to the final release, and please
do help out your favourite flavour(s) with ISO testing and feedback.
On behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team,
Adam Conrad
PS: If you find something being hung up in the queue that you feel should
be auto-accepted, let us know, w
bout Ubuntu and about this beta release on our
website, IRC channel and wiki.
To sign up for future Ubuntu announcements, please subscribe to Ubuntu's
very low volume announcement list at:
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-announce
On behalf of the entire Ubuntu Relea
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 10:21:44AM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
>
> Then upstream QA (and anyone else) can test the proposed binary packages
> from this PPA to help decide whether upstream should release. If QA
> fails at this stage, upstream will not release, fix the issue and skip
> the version num
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 12:49:05PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 07:34:12AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > If they aren't going to reuse the version number, why not go ahead and
> > release? Seems much simpler workflow wise and if there's a problem,
> > they're
> > bump
7;m sure there will
be reasons to respin, but please do get to testing, so we have a
better handle on the state of the world as it is today.
On behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team,
... Adam Conrad
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
htt
tu and about this release on our
website listed below:
http://www.ubuntu.com
To sign up for future Ubuntu announcements, please subscribe to
Ubuntu's very low volume announcement list at:
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-announce
On behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team,
Ad
After a short period of wrangling things from utopic-proposed
to vivid-proposed and a few small merges and uploads to prime
the archive, vivid is now open for development.
In theory, this shouldn't change much, but the arch-indep
build architecture has been changed from i386 to amd64, which
more c
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 09:36:59PM +0100, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
> Not a torrent expert, so perhaps this is normal. But, I noticed there's
> an error message from the bittorrent client when getting the torrent for
> the amd64 version of Ubuntu Studio 14.10.
>
> The error message "Requested download is
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 03:00:55PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 09:36:59PM +0100, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
> >
> > The error message "Requested download is not authorized for use with
> > this tracker"
>
> We'll try to get it fixed up so
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:15:21AM +, Iain Lane wrote:
> I was just browsing the "UOS" schedule looking for this session to
> subscribe to, but it's not there.
>
> Should we have it? There's no release schedule yet AFAICS.
We should, yes. I'll be on VAC, but promised Steve I'll un-VAC for
an
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 07:50:30AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> Someone please remember to harass Riddell about attending as I'll be
> travelling for $WORK and not available.
I'm whipping up a draft release schedule tomorrow (today, I guess, but
after I've slept), if you have any KDE-specif
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 01:23:07PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> Releases are now numbered year/month. 14.12 beta 3 is November 19th and
> final
> release is December 17th. It would be nice to avoid an Ubuntu milestone that
> week.
This one might be unavoidable. Due to December being wh
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 01:04:42PM +1100, Ali/amjjawad wrote:
>
> According to this:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TrustyTahr/ReleaseSchedule
>
> 14.04.2 is due in 5th of Feb, 2015.
>
> I'm just checking if we're going to stick to that date? or there is any kind
> of
> a change?
So far, we're on t
Thursday has come and, in almost all time zones gone, and I apologize
for us not communicating this well except on IRC. It was fairly
obvious to most, I think, that the HWE bits for 14.04.2 landed a bit
late to realistically expect anyone to validate them (and, indeed, I
still need to clean up som
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 10:59:38AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> There's a large stack of verified SRUs for trusty that were waiting for the
> release. We probably ought to let those loose on Monday. Any objections?
I had planned to do that when I got settled in Hong Kong, but no
objection
After a ton of arguing with livecd-rootfs to accomodate the new HWE
bits, I've spun up new builds of trusty for all flavours. I still
need to check all the manifest diffs to make sure I didn't mess up,
but this shouldn't stop people from getting to testing.
Any changes from here should be fairly
alf of the Ubuntu Release Team,
... Adam Conrad
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
he release team, so we only review the
uploads that need very serious consideration.
Happy bughunting on our push from here to the final release, and please
do help out your favourite flavour(s) with ISO testing and feedback.
On behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team,
Adam Conrad
PS: If you find
el and wiki.
To sign up for future Ubuntu announcements, please subscribe to Ubuntu's
very low volume announcement list at:
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-announce
On behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team,
Adam Conrad
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubun
ow volume announcement list at:
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-announce
On behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team,
Adam Conrad
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
There is finally a draft Wily release schedule posted at:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/WilyWerewolf/ReleaseSchedule
If people could go through it and follow-up to the ubuntu-release list
if they have any serious issues with it, that would be lovely.
As always, everyone will have minor nitpicks, a spe
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 05:17:38PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
> There is finally a draft Wily release schedule posted at:
>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/WilyWerewolf/ReleaseSchedule
>
[...]
>
> Comments and complaints welcome, please don't edit directly, but
> rather disc
o the developers and testers for their efforts to
pull together this Alpha release!
On behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team,
Adam Conrad
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
It's that time of year again, yet another 14.04 LTS point release
is upon us. I'm building RC images for all LTS flavours right now,
which should pop out on the tracker at:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/344/builds
When your flavour of choice pops up, please put it through some
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 02:20:30PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
> It's that time of year again, yet another 14.04 LTS point release
> is upon us. I'm building RC images for all LTS flavours right now,
> which should pop out on the tracker at:
>
> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com
alf of the Ubuntu Release Team,
... Adam Conrad
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:23:03PM +0100, Aliz 'Randomdude' wrote:
>
> I'm unable to validate the gpg signature located at
> http://releases.ubuntu.com/vivid/SHA1SUMS.gpg correctly, though I can
> validate SHA256SUMS and MD5SUMS files.
>
> user@box:~$ gpg --verify SHA1SUMS.gpg SHA1SUMS
> gpg: Sig
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 08:21:56AM +1000, Ali/amjjawad wrote:
>
> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/345/builds
>
> I can't see Ubuntu GNOME 15.10 Beta 1 listed :(
Fixed in the manifest, will pop up when the current build finishes.
... Adam
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-rel
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 12:57:35PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 12:33:48PM +0100, James Page wrote:
> >
> > In-line with previous releases we'll need to upload further beta's and
> > release candidates as required for all core OpenStack projects (and
> > direct dependencies ma
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 09:18:05AM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 03:12:57PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
> >
> > NACK. Aligning our entire distro with one upstream isn't going to
> > happen; continuing to grant OpenStack exceptions seems like the
x27;s
broken in your environment(s).
On behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team,
Adam Conrad
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
nnounce
On behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team,
Adam Conrad
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
and
a few spare hours here and there to get to testing to make sure we have
another uneventful release next week. Last minute panic is never fun.
On behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team,
... Adam Conrad
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe
I'm kicking off builds of all flavours for "RC"(ish) images to the Wily
Final milestone on the tracker. These definitely won't be the last
builds (there will be at least one respin on Monday to flip the OFFICIAL
bit in the ISO names, include an updated base-files, and a last-minute
dpkg bugfix upl
cements, please subscribe to
Ubuntu's very low volume announcement list at:
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-announce
On behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team,
Adam Conrad
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
ht
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 09:31:54AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> That works for a silo, because with a silo you want to install *all* of the
> packages from the ppa together, and pull any additional dependencies from
> the main archive. For -proposed, we explicitly want to pick and choose
> *w
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 02:16:39PM -0700, Adam Conrad wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 09:31:54AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >
> > That works for a silo, because with a silo you want to install *all* of the
> > packages from the ppa together, and pull any additional depe
I should have sent this email a few days ago, but I've been swamped
with moving house over the holidays, so I'm a bit late. That said,
I've had not a single person volunteer for the paperwork bits, and
no one has mentioned the Alpha yet.
Xenial Alpha 1 is scheduled for Dec 31 and, given the above
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 12:13:16AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> I've uploaded what I believe to be fixes for both these bugs. Hopefully
> I haven't fouled up anything else in the process.
Alright, given that Colin decided to Fix All The Bugs on his vacation,
I'm proposing that instead of cance
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 06:00:28PM +, Martin Wimpress wrote:
>
> Monday Jan 4th is good for Ubuntu MATE.
Alright, the milestone has been created, cronjobs disabled, and a
set of RC images spun for Lubuntu, MATE, and Kylin. Looks like
wxl will be handling chasing people down for testing resul
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 09:13:35PM -0600, Erick Brunzell wrote:
> According to my calendar 14.04.4 is tentatively due February 4th:
>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TrustyTahr/ReleaseSchedule
This will pronbably end up delayed for a week, due to some scheduling
conflicts with Canonical QA being double
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 03:10:46PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
>
> The second one is to start the procedure to have a Freeze Exception[4]
> for the source packages `pdns` and `pdns-recursor`, allowing the upgrade
> from alpha1 to alpha2 to beta and to final release, after which the
> normal Ubuntu u
For starters, people may note that the date in the subject is a week
later than they were expecting. Due to a lack of testing of the HWE
stack, and a few other compounded issues (like my being ill), I'm
delaying the release until the 18th, prefering having it done right,
rather than having it done
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 02:55:47PM -0500, Corey Bryant wrote:
>
> In the past this has been business as usual, so this email is for awareness
> and
> to ensure that the Release team is in agreement that we continue with this
> approach in Xenial.
Business as usual, indeed. Carry on, this has wo
A new set of RC images (20160216) has been spun for all flavours for
the trusty point release. With any luck, these might also be the
final images, but please do give them a thorough run-through so we
can see if we need to push any last-minute fixes between now and the
end of the week.
Happy test
I've just kicked off a world image respin that should come out as
20160217 for everyone. This includes a few security updates, two
last-minute stability updates, and the correct 14.04.4 versioning.
Given the testing on the last couple of images, I think it's fair
to say this is almost definitely
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 02:48:21AM -0700, Adam Conrad wrote:
>
> Given the testing on the last couple of images, I think it's fair
> to say this is almost definitely the batch we'll be releasing on
> Thursday, so please give them at least a boot/install/reboot smoke
>
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 04:51:49PM -0800, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
> We have a commented bit in our release notes for Xenial waiting for official
> Ubuntu involvement that should include some common bugs:
>
> <>
Yes, this was replaced by, instead, having common issues on the "main"
release notes,
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
