Re: New component-mismatches for source universe -> main

2019-12-07 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Dec 07, 2019 at 01:00:28PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > This is odd. > Is ifupdown2 trying to provide ifupdown? Because as far as I know > cloud-init doesn't support ifupdown2 directly. Yes, there's a Provides: there; and since ifupdown2 is arch: all, this is the only package now

Re: New component-mismatches for source universe -> main

2019-12-07 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Dec 07, 2019 at 01:00:28PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > This is odd. > Is ifupdown2 trying to provide ifupdown? Because as far as I know > cloud-init doesn't support ifupdown2 directly. > Also, cloud-init in Ubuntu must drop dependency on ifupdown, as it's no > longer supported.

Re: New component-mismatches for source universe -> main

2019-12-07 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
This is odd. Is ifupdown2 trying to provide ifupdown? Because as far as I know cloud-init doesn't support ifupdown2 directly. Also, cloud-init in Ubuntu must drop dependency on ifupdown, as it's no longer supported. On Sat, 7 Dec 2019, 12:55 process-component-mismatches-diff, <

Re: New component-mismatches for source universe -> main

2017-05-19 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 19 May 2017 at 10:39, Michał Sawicz wrote: > W dniu 19.05.2017 o 11:24, Alan Griffiths pisze: >> On that basis I don't think we want qtubuntu-android or qtmir-android. >> Saviq can you confirm? > > Correct, anything -android can go, along with anything -gles. >

Re: New component-mismatches for source universe -> main

2017-05-19 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Hello, I have tried to reseed back in: + * content-hub # alan-griffiths, saviq copy support + * libmiral-dev # miral + * qtmir-desktop# qtmir + * qtmir-android# qtmir-gles + * qtubuntu-desktop # qtubuntu + * qtubuntu-android # qtubuntu-gles But that pulls in a lot of stuff, as

Re: New component-mismatches for source universe -> main

2017-04-24 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 09:52:50AM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > I believe I have caused the below email, when trying to prepare for > src:upstart demotion and removal, by removing unity8-desktop-session > from the seeds. > However, I do not see what has exploded at >

Re: New component-mismatches for source universe -> main

2017-04-24 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
I believe I have caused the below email, when trying to prepare for src:upstart demotion and removal, by removing unity8-desktop-session from the seeds. However, I do not see what has exploded at http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.txt or did someone already fix

Re: New component-mismatches for source universe - main

2014-11-10 Thread Iain Lane
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 06:31:56PM +, process-component-mismatches-diff wrote: The following universe packages have new reverse dependencies in main or got seeded. They need to get a MainInclusionReport and be promoted, or the reverse dependencies in main need to be dropped: o

Re: New component-mismatches for source universe - main

2014-10-17 Thread Martin Pitt
process-component-mismatches-diff [2014-10-17 11:58 +]: o autodep8: autodep8 [Reverse-Recommends: autopkgtest (MAIN)] Whoops, sorry about that! https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autodep8/+bug/1382524 Martin -- Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de

Re: New component-mismatches for source universe - main

2014-07-30 Thread Robie Basak
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 07:28:49PM +, process-component-mismatches-diff wrote: o hiera: hiera [Reverse-Depends: ruby-hiera (MAIN)] Looks like this is just a rename from ruby-hiera to hiera, and the source is the same. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751386 and

Re: New component-mismatches for source universe - main

2014-07-30 Thread Robie Basak
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 09:46:57PM +, process-component-mismatches-diff wrote: o nodejs: nodejs nodejs-dbg nodejs-dev [Reverse-Depends: Rescued from nodejs, node-less] o twitter-bootstrap: libjs-twitter-bootstrap libjs-twitter-bootstrap-docs [Reverse-Depends: Rescued from

Re: New component-mismatches for source universe - main

2014-06-11 Thread Martin Pitt
process-component-mismatches-diff [2014-06-11 20:07 +]: The following universe packages have new reverse dependencies in main or got seeded. They need to get a MainInclusionReport and be promoted, or the reverse dependencies in main need to be dropped: o language-pack-brx:

Re: New component-mismatches for source universe - main

2013-08-02 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
Hello, On 2 August 2013 15:44, process-component-mismatches-diff martin.p...@ubuntu.com wrote: The following universe packages have new reverse dependencies in main or got seeded. They need to get a MainInclusionReport and be promoted, or the reverse dependencies in main need to be dropped:

Re: New component-mismatches for source universe - main

2012-05-06 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 05:12:56AM +, process-component-mismatches-diff wrote: o libperl4-corelibs-perl: libperl4-corelibs-perl [Reverse-Depends: lsof (MAIN)] We don't want this; I've uploaded lsof to avoid it. -- Colin Watson

Re: New component-mismatches for source universe - main

2012-01-13 Thread Tim Gardner
On 01/12/2012 08:42 AM, Colin Watson wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:43:29PM +, Colin Watson wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 05:32:40PM +, process-component-mismatches-diff wrote: o wireless-crda: wireless-crda [Reverse-Depends: linux-image-3.2.0-1403-omap4 (MAIN)] Could

Re: New component-mismatches for source universe - main

2012-01-11 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:43:29PM +, Colin Watson wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 05:32:40PM +, process-component-mismatches-diff wrote: o wireless-crda: wireless-crda [Reverse-Depends: linux-image-3.2.0-1403-omap4 (MAIN)] Could somebody on the kernel team deal with this?

Re: New component-mismatches for source universe - main

2012-01-09 Thread Stéphane Graber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01/09/2012 11:59 AM, process-component-mismatches-diff wrote: The following universe packages have new reverse dependencies in main or got seeded. They need to get a MainInclusionReport and be promoted, or the reverse dependencies in main

Re: New component-mismatches for source universe - main

2011-12-14 Thread Martin Pitt
process-component-mismatches-diff [2011-12-14 11:43 +]: o antlr-maven-plugin: libantlr-maven-plugin-java [Reverse-Build-Depends: libhibernate3-java] [... and so on, explosion .. ] That would have been the libcommons-lang-java autosync. I reverted it from -3 back to -1. Martin --

Re: New component-mismatches for source universe - main

2011-12-01 Thread Martin Pitt
process-component-mismatches-diff [2011-12-01 11:32 +]: MIR: #881464 (New) MIR: #888770 (Incomplete) MIR: #780767 (Fix Committed) MIR: #898268 (Incomplete) MIR: #887344 (Incomplete) Erk, sorry for this. This report is the next thing on my list to fix properly in

Re: New component-mismatches for source universe - main

2011-07-12 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello all, process-component-mismatches-diff [2011-07-13 1:40 +]: The following universe packages have new reverse dependencies in main or got seeded. They need to get a MainInclusionReport and be promoted, or the reverse dependencies in main need to be dropped: o ibus-pinyin: