On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Rajeev Prasad rp.ne...@yahoo.com wrote:
hello,
Can anyone suggest the most widely accepted and open source SSL cert
authority, from whom a 'free' SSL cert can be obtained? OR,
should i generate my own cert? (this is my last option)
ty.
I'm not sure
For configuration and change management Puppet is a great tool. Most people
using Puppet will use PXE with preseed or jumpstart to provision and boot
strap new servers to the point that Puppet can take over and push the
necessary configurations and packages to it. This lets you have one master
Virtualization puts a lot of stress on your storage system. With only a
pair of sata drives in a RAID1 configuration it's likely that you're seeing
issues related to the IO bottle neck that causes. I believe you would have
similar issues using iSCSI with that setup.
There are only so many IOPs
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Ruben Laban r.la...@ism.nl wrote:
This is the new 10.04 and newer way.
In order to have the last 3 lines applied, you need to replace the
ifenslave
lines with:
bond-slaves eth0 eth1
Looks like I have a 10.04 server setup the old way but it is working.
I've also had good luck with the Areca controllers. Just be aware that the
arcmsr module that ships with Lucid and Maverick does not support the newest
1880 series controllers.
If you do choose to go that way I have a pretty detailed post on my blog on
how to install Ubuntu Lucid on a server
I've run into this bug as well on a new install of Karmic.
--
dpkg-reconfigure samba fails with sed error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480617
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs
Pound is in the universe repository. I'm not endorsing it as I've never had
the need for a load balancer but it seems to be a pretty popular choice.
--
David
2009/3/18 Kaushal Shriyan kaushalshri...@gmail.com
Hi
Is there an open source Load balancer available on Ubuntu Linux ?
Thanks and
I still think you're missing the point. The problem was not what Sun said
or is trying to sell you but with your pre-conception of what they were
selling you. While it is technically a server it is really a storage
appliance that just happens to be based on Open Solaris and ZFS. So the
can do if you have NetApp or EMC hardware.
But I think you'll find that $22k doesn't buy you much of anything when it
comes to enterprise storage.
--
David
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Onno Benschop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/11/08 08:13, David Miller wrote:
I still think you're
I believe the preferred way is to use update-rc.d. For more details
on how to use the command check out the update-rc.d man page. This
blog post may also be helpful.
http://pthree.org/2008/02/27/managing-services-in-ubuntu-part-ii-managing-runlevels/
--
David
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:30 PM,
Rants aside...there are definitely some use cases that currently aren't
possible. I think we can all agree on that.
But I don't think that Michael is alone here. I know that this particular
issue has prevented us from deploying Ubuntu on our servers. I would
imagine that this issue is a show
There's a lot of kernel tweaks that can be used to fine tune your network
stack for this type of workload but you didn't mention how critical latency
is to your workload. That will also need to be factored into what settings
to use.
Pretty much anything in /proc/sys/net/core/ and
12 matches
Mail list logo
