Please don't do that. Suddenly creating bugs like this against a
bazillion packages spams lots of people, and really isn't cool
(especially when you haven't discussed your idea with anybody, and there
isn't really much hope you'll ever find anybody to do this for you)
** No longer affects:
Sigh, please stop doing this. You've been asked not to on more than one
occasion already.
** No longer affects: accountsservice (Ubuntu)
** No longer affects: udisks (Ubuntu)
** No longer affects: ubuntu-system-service (Ubuntu)
** No longer affects: util-linux (Ubuntu)
--
You received this
As Matt LaPlante pointed out above, this should be eligible for a SRU,
as the bug is a regression from a previous version
--
fail2ban fails to start after reboot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222804
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a
This is actually fixed in 0.8.2-3 in Intrepid, so I'm marking it as Fix
Released as per the bug triage process. If you want it in Hardy, someone
needs to add a milestone I think, and I don't know how to do that
** Changed in: fail2ban (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
fail2ban
Confirmed for winbind 3.2.0-4ubuntu2 in Intrepid
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
/etc/init.d/winbind has a parse error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253993
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to
The original bug is fixed. The problem now though, is when you upgrade,
dpkg runs the old prerm script which tries to stop winbind. This
procedure fails due to the syntax error in the old init script, which
prevents the upgrade.
You can work around this by hand-editing /etc/init.d/winbind before
** Changed in: fail2ban (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
[SRU] fail2ban fails to start after reboot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222804
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a direct subscriber.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs
David - It is marked 'Fix Released' because it is fixed in Intrepid.
However, there is a separate status for Hardy, which is still set to
'Confirmed'.
--
[SRU] fail2ban fails to start after reboot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222804
You received this bug notification because you are a member
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 138535 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138535
Thanks. This is a duplicate of bug 138535.
** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: update-manager = php5
Importance: Undecided = Low
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
** This bug has been
John
I will take care of this tonight if nobody else has done already.
--
[SRU] fail2ban fails to start after reboot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222804
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a direct subscriber.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs
** Changed in: fail2ban (Ubuntu Hardy)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Chris Coulson (chrisccoulson)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
[SRU] fail2ban fails to start after reboot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222804
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
John,
Please find revised debdiff attached. All I have done is correct the bug
report number and version number in the changelog, as requested. I've
credited Chuck Short as he did the original patch.
** Attachment added: fail2ban_0.8.2-2ubuntu0.1.debdiff
But the 'samba' binary package doesn't provide any shared libraries to
link against does it? So why install the header files? The Samba source
package does provide libsmbclient, which is a shared library with header
files.
--
Please add a samba-dev package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302004
Thank you for your bug report. The error is here:
Conflicts found! Please edit `/etc/samba/smb.conf' and sort them out
manually.
The file `/etc/samba/smb.conf.ucf-new' has a record of the failed merge
of the configuration file.
Could you please provide your /etc/samba/smb.conf and
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. However, your crash report is either missing or
challenging to deal with as a .crash file. Please follow these
instructions to have apport report a new bug about your crash that can
be dealt with by the automatic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 302542 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302542
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 302542, so it is being marked as such. Please look
** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
Status: New = Triaged
** Summary changed:
- php 5.2.7 released
+ Please upgrade php5 to new upstream version 5.2.7
** Tags added: upgrade
** Tags removed: needs-packaging
--
Please upgrade php5 to new upstream version
We can just wait until 5.2.8 is released
--
Please upgrade php5 to new upstream version 5.2.7
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305393
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
There's nothing keeping xulrunner-1.9.2 in main now
** Changed in: xulrunner-1.9.2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
** Changed in: gwt (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
** Changed in: gwt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Chris Coulson (chrisccoulson)
--
You
couchdb + libmozjs is in my PPA now
** Changed in: couchdb (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to gwt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe] Updates to
I've just pushed
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-4.0.head/revision/822
, which means that firefox-dev will provide a mozilla-plugin pkgconfig
file now (but I'm not sure I should upload this until after beta now).
In any case, the only open items are browser plugins, which
I've actually packaged this in Ubuntu now, but I hit a couple of
unexpected issues:
1) js-config --libs doesn't return the right linker flags (-lmozjs)
2) Even though it builds an ABI versioned so, the soname of the
resulting ELF binary is still unversioned (ie, libmozjs185.so rather
than
Created attachment 521592
Fix js-config --libs
This makes js-config --libs return the right linker flags
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to gwt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe] Updates to
Created attachment 521593
Fix SONAME
This ensures that the resulting binary has the right soname
(libmozjs185.so.1.0). tbh, I couldn't figure out a better way of doing
this, so I'm not sure if anyone else has any better ideas
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Changed in: icedtea-web (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Chris Coulson (chrisccoulson)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to gwt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe] Updates to enable us
Thank you for taking the time to report this issue and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Examining the information you have given us, this does
not appear to be a bug report so we are closing it and converting it to
a question in the support tracker. We appreciate the difficulties you
are facing, but
That is because no such binary package appears in the archive
** Changed in: net-snmp (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
Execute: sudo apt-get install net-snmp , E: Couldn't find package net-snmp
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496981
You received this bug notification because you are a
I was going to go ahead and just change the default, but then i tried
xterm and terminator and they both default to 24 rows too. Should we
consider changing other terminal emulators too?
Would you mind forwarding this upstream for discussion there too
** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu)
Thanks!
** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Triaged
--
gnome-terminal should default to 80x25 for application compatibility
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed
29 matches
Mail list logo
