Asif,
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 04:17:18PM -0400, Asif Iqbal wrote:
> iface eth0:1 inet static
eth0:1 isn't an interface. As far as I'm aware, ifupdown doesn't support
aliases directly, so you can't just add a stanza for it in
/etc/network/interfaces. But I may need to be corrected on this.
I've a
Dear List,
I have been asked whether we need to do anything for OpenMPI for Q. I
had a blueprint for P on this, for which I ended up delivering a 1.5
package in the archive.
Current status to the best of my knowledge is:
* Upstream use an old Linux-style odd/even beta/stable version
number
There were two issues I wanted to bring up. I apologise for not managing
to send this email before UDS - I was away last week. So this is a bit
of a brain dump.
1. Triage list does not reduce after triaging is complete.
Bugs that can be worked on out of a triage list will inevitably be
progressed
Peter,
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 03:43:17PM +0200, Peter Hoffmann wrote:
> On the other hand php5-cli/-cgi does not contain sqlite<3 support. So
> right now the only difference to have access to sqlite<3 databases in
> php using the current ubuntu version is to download the php-sources and
> install
Are you setting a kernel commandline of "priority=critical"?
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Hi,
Here are the minutes of the meeting. They can also be found online with
the irc logs here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/Server/20121009.
Meeting Actions
* ACTION: jamespage and Ursinha to look into aligning release team and server
team tracking reports
* ACT
Marc,
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:18:58AM -0400, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have pushed updated MySQL 5.1.66 packages for Ubuntu 10.04 LTS and
> Ubuntu 11.10, and MySQL 5.5.28 for Ubuntu 12.04 LTS and Ubuntu 12.10
> into the -proposed pocket.
Could you please consider bug 1014732? I stuc
Hey Clint,
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 09:30:27AM -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
> The only hesitation is that conffile changes in updates are usually
> discouraged, but I think in this case its worth it to avoid having
> problems 1/13th of the time.
So the reason I was reluctant at first is that I consid
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 01:00:10AM -0500, Chuck Peters wrote:
> I have seen a number of recommendations to use bind 9.9 rather than 9.8
> when deploying DNSSEC. It appears the upcoming release of bind is from
> Debian experimental, and not unstable. What's up with that?
Debian is in freeze at th
What do others think about preparing SRUs as a way to get started - in
particular, for upstream bugs fixed upstream? For someone with
programming skills, understanding these triaged bugs and isolating and
cherry-picking fixes shouldn't be too difficult.
I'm ignoring SRUs that are packaging issues
errors.ubuntu.com has been a great success on the desktop[1]. Would
support for sending reports from server installations be useful?
Even though vUDS is already underway, I thought a mailing list
discussion would be more useful than a session to throw ideas around
first. We can always arrange a se
Another idea:
A debconf option to automatically upload all crash reports, and an
installer prompt to enable this. Could the debconf priority and default
differ in the installer depending on whether we're on the development
release or not?
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.
facter in Debian now recommends virt-what. facter automatically uses it
over its own internal detection if it available.
virt-what looks like it has more comprehensive coverage over facter. For
example, in an Openstack deployment I tried just now, in Saucy virt-what
correctly detects KVM, whereas
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 12:37:04AM -0300, Tiago Porangaba wrote:
> However I am not sure what you mean saying *"isolating and*
> *cherry-picking fixes shouldn't be too difficult."*
> *
> *
> My guess is that you mean that I should pick a triaged bug, pick one fix
> from some suggested fixes and sub
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 07:01:54AM -0700, Evan Dandrea wrote:
> Why do you assume an opt-in system? Error reporting on the desktop is
> not opt-in, and for good reason: our data would be heavily skewed to
> the types of people who already know that the error reporting
> functionality exists, can fi
I thought I'd split this thread into two. One question is about what
benefits error reporting on Server might bring, and that's what I'd like
to discuss here.
> [Daviey] Just need to work out, *if* it is worth doing...
Is it worth doing? What sorts of errors will we pick up on right now? Do
these
> [Daviey] ... *how* to do it...
I thought I'd summarise the mechanism we've proposed here, so it's in
one place for others to follow and discuss further if they wish.
1. d-i will prompt for automatic error uploads to errors.ubuntu.com.
This will default to Yes. The installer will be able to sele
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:01:23PM +0200, Alex Muntada wrote:
> Thus, i'd advocate to No as a default in the short term and then make
> the world know about this feature, encourage people to explicitly
> enable it and resolve any privacy concerns raised. Eventually, you
> could re-evaluate whether
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 05:35:48PM +0100, Evan Dandrea wrote:
> On 24 May 2013 17:20, Robie Basak wrote:
> > For MAAS, I presume that we could make the d-i preseed configurable at a
> > global level.
>
> I'm intimately familiar with preseeding, that being my former life
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 12:44:47PM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Also, you fail to mention what will be the default on the cloud images.
I hadn't considered that. Thanks for bringing it up. I see that if
"yes", then users won't really have been asked the question depending on
how they start their cl
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 10:00:38AM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> ubuntu@server$ crash-info
> There are 6 crash reports pending.
>
> To help make Ubuntu better by sending all pending crash reports to
> errors.ubuntu.com, type "crash --send".
>
>
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 11:13:08AM +, John Moser wrote:
[...]
> In effect, there is no legal standing for the dynamic linking clause in the
> GPL, AGPL, or similar. If there was, then distributions could be held
> responsible for supplying i.e. MongoDB with libagssl (a theoretical,
> fun
I scratched an itch and implemented an adt-virt-lxc, as I couldn't find
that anybody else had worked on it.
It's here: https://code.launchpad.net/~racb/ubuntu/saucy/autopkgtest/lxc
Or just grab the adt-virt-lxc binary from it, and run:
autopkgtest (...) --- /path/to/downloaded/adt-virt-lxc sau
I think I have an issue running multiple tests. I want to add a dep8
test I've written to puppet. It already has a test, so I'm adding a
second one.
Initially my adt-virt-lxc driver didn't support the "revert" capability
and I found that I couldn't run both tests in a single adt-run.
adt-virt-nul
Thanks Jean-Baptiste!
I've made the changes you suggested. The driver now uses ephemeral
containers. With --keep-data I think it uses the host filesystem (not
tmpfs) so I think I avoided the space pitfall you mentioned.
I'm waiting for boot-finished as you described now. There was a race to
fix b
== Agenda ==
* Review ACTION points from previous meeting
* ''ACTION:'' Daviey set priority on s-cycle BPs
* ''ACTION:'' Daviey follow up on missing BPs from overview s-topic
* Saucy Development
* Release Tracking Bug Tasks -
http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-s-tracking-bug
check_apt does not correctly report pending security updates as
critical, as it is designed to do.
https://launchpad.net/bugs/1031680
The problem is the fundamental way it's designed. I reported this to
upstream and they said the following:
I agree with your stance on parsing apt-get out
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 04:30:58PM -0400, Chuck Peters wrote:
> I asked Thijs Kinkhorst, the Debian Developer, if he could build the new
> version and this morning he uploaded it! It's still in the build queue as
> seen here:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mailman&suite=sid
>
>
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:55:01PM -0400, Chuck Peters wrote:
> I would like to see someone take the lead on making sure we have latest
> stable releases of some software.
I agree. Thanks for the suggestion. I'd like to see us more up-to-date,
too, and I agree with having a session discussing some
There has been much work in Debian since wheezy was released, including
a major transition to Apache 2.4[1]. The maintainers used this
opportunity to overhaul the packaging, which also affected dependencies
such as PHP[2].
Ubuntu has picked this up. We're now well into feature freeze, and
expect t
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:45:30AM +0200, Raffaele Morelli wrote:
> The same network card is installed on a debian server, lspci output
> correctly shows 4 entries.
What kernel version are you using on your Debian server?
See if your NIC works properly with the latest Ubuntu Server release
(13.04
Hi Thomas,
I've just been asked about this and I remembered your post. AIUI,
previously the security team were dubious about taking on nginx, but I
understand that things have changed now. The security team would be
happy for us to file an MIR for them to review nginx again.
Since Trusty will be
I just discussed this briefly with pitti.
Since:
* breaks-testbed tests are currently not supported in our
infrastructure, and we think that using one will cause the testing
infrastructure to treat it as a failure.
* Server tests are generally breaks-testbed.
but:
The infrastructure will happe
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 04:33:26PM +, James Page wrote:
> Hi Folks
> Description: Default server install
>
> [...]
> wireless-tools
> wpasupplicant
For bootstrapping reasons, it would be nice to keep these on the ISO
even if not in the default install. Would there be any real cost to
doing th
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 05:15:41PM -0600, C de-Avillez wrote:
> Although I am probably hammering a rather cold iron, I still fail to
> understand why ntp is not installed by default. I would expect precise
> timekeeping to be something important on a server (instead of allowing
> the time to drift
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 04:22:31PM -0700, cdmiller wrote:
> Thanks for all the great info. We'll be taking a look at cloud-utils,
> uvtool etc.. Currently we run ubuntu-vm-builder via a wrapper which sets
> up initial IP, installs and configures puppet, places an initial puppet
> run in a firstboo
Meeting information
#ubuntu-meeting: ubuntu-server-team, 17 Dec at 16:09 — 16:20 UTC
Full logs at
http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2013/ubuntu-meeting.2013-12-17-16.09.log.html
Meeting summary
This meeting was particularly quiet, presumably due to the upcoming hol
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 03:23:12PM +0100, Stefan Bader wrote:
> Debian has removed xen-api/xen-api-libs from testing and were thinking about
> removing it completely from Sid as nobody cared about it. Citrix is working on
> some overhaul but have not come forward with something usable, yet.
> When
Application drafted by MySQL upstream:
I would like to apply for a micro release exception for MySQL
Server.
Upstream:
- Micro releases happen from low-volume stable branches,
approximately once every two months.
- Stable branches are supported with bug fixes for 8 years.
- Upstream
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 01:45:44PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> Unless somebody steps up to maintain xen-api, I don't think it makes
> sense to continue keeping these packages in Ubuntu, given that Debian
> have removed them from testing and the existing packages broken (and, it
>
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 05:36:57PM -0500, Asif Iqbal wrote:
> Any suggestion on how to troubleshoot this?
Try tcpdump, to see what is actually not going out or not arriving.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.u
I've been thinking about doing a regular throrough review of all
packages that we [server team] look after, to ensure that no essential
package unnecessarily ships a version that is significantly older than
the last relevant freeze date.
So I got on with it. To start with, I looked at all packages
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:28:48PM -0400, Simon Deziel wrote:
> Since Debian is about to get OpenSSH 6.6 [1], I was wondering if that
> would be possible to get this bugfix/security release [2] in Trusty too?
I didn't see it initially, since I only compared against Debian which
didn't have it at t
Hi Ratheesh,
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 02:30:13PM +0530, ratheesh kannoth wrote:
> I could see in /boot/config-3.11.0-12-generic file that
> CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM=y.
>
> 1) Is there any way to get around ?
>
I'm not sure. If you don't get an answer here, try the Ubuntu kernel
team mailing list
A few last pieces are being worked in the last couple of days to final
freeze.
* James Page is struggling to find a release team member to review the
docker.io feature freeze exception request (bug 1295093).
* The juju-quickstart MIR is deferred; Robie will upload some final
bugfixes
(also blogged)
As part of the Ubuntu Server team's participation in the [Ubuntu Open
Summit][1], we'll be running two Q&A sessions this week aimed at Ubuntu
Server users. We want to gather questions from the community both before
and during the event, so that users can get direct and authoritative
I mentioned in the Server Security Q&A session yesterday that I had, for
example, an AppArmor profile for radicale that constrains radicale to
access only the calendar files that it serves.
Since radicale is in universe, this provides some mitigation to a
security update not arriving timely. AppAr
Hi,
(I looked to include the nagios-plugins fork in this email also, but was
unable to find a suitable mailing list)
For people following the Ubuntu Server list, note that this relates to
our nagios-plugins source package.
I submitted
https://github.com/monitoring-plugins/monitoring-plugins/pull
U Development
The discussion about "U Development" started at 16:00.
* Feature freeze is August 21. Note Debian Import Freeze is coming up
as well.
* The mysql /var/lib/mysql discussion is proceeding, but it seems
unlikely that this will happen by feature freeze now. Nevertheless
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 06:43:43PM -0300, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
> Nevertheless, Ubuntu Trusty 14.04.1 still does NOT have this patch. Do you
> guys knows when it will be pushed to the main repo?!
See the most recent server team meeting minutes. Around August 8th.
signature.asc
Description: Digi
I'd like to seed ntp in both server and cloud-image in Vivid. Servers
should maintain the correct time by default. Please make any objections
now.
Right now, ntpdate is seeded in minimal. It makes little sense to have
both ntpdate and ntp installed.
So is there some mechanism I can use to have nt
I should add some more related links:
Debian making NTP happen by default too is being discussed in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731594. openntpd was
suggested, but this effort seems to have languished, and in Ubuntu we
have ntp in main, not openntpd.
An ntpdate issue in both
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:09:53PM +, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Does this seem sensible? Any suggestions/alternatives are
> appreciated.
Is it possible to have a lowest common denominator "LTS" machine type
that is long term stable and doesn't need to change or be deprecated
between releases? Or
Scott,
Thank you for all the work you've put into postfix and clamav on Ubuntu.
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 02:29:38PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I do think that for the Ubuntu Server community, it's important that
> the work be done and I'd be glad to help bring someone up to speed on
> what ne
Review ACTION points from previous meeting
The discussion about "Review ACTION points from previous meeting"
started at 16:00.
* dannf will look at bug 1427406 "data corruption on arm64" soon
* Bug 1432715 "tomcat7 ftbfs in vivd (test failures)" is waiting on a
fix in Debian
* hallyn
Hi Chuck,
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 08:54:30PM +, Chuck Peters wrote:
> Andreas Metzler pointed to a set of patches which are included in the
> upcoming release of Exim4. I would like to see this issue resolved
> for trusty and newer releases.
Thank you for bringing this bug to our attention.
users back from 1.9 to 1.8 in future.
We think option A fits better with the needs of nginx users, but welcome
further discussion.
Please can we agree on feature freeze and SRU policy exceptions so that
we can execute option A, or otherwise discuss alternatives?
Thanks,
Robie Basak and Thom
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:50:05AM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> Please can we agree on feature freeze and SRU policy exceptions so that
> we can execute option A, or otherwise discuss alternatives?
Any thoughts please? Although we'd not execute on any exception until
2016, Thomas needs
The meeting was very short with little that needed discussion.
* matsubara will be performing SRU verification on bug 1443735
"recordfail false positive causes headless servers to hang on boot by
default".
* The ODS for Tokyo submission is open.
* No meeting actions were assigned.
* T
Hi David,
Wrong list. This is the public Ubuntu Server list. Operations on
ServerStack mean nothing to most readers.
(ServerStack is one of the internal-to-Canonical OpenStack deployments
we use for testing and dogfooding).
Robie
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
htt
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:35:20AM -0500, Andrew Martin wrote:
>...Are
> there any plans to add support for the kGraft/kPatch support available in 4.x
> series kernels in Ubuntu Server 16.04?
We rely on the Ubuntu
Dear Server Users,
We've been tackling some long running bugs recently.
"recordfail false positive causes headless servers to hang on boot by
default" [1] is fixed.
"apt repository disk format has race conditions" [2] is well on the way to
being fixed; this work should be done by 16.04.
"apt-ch
* rbasak listed areas that he thinks needs looking at before Xenial
feature freeze on 18 Feb. hallyn pointed out that this should be in a
blueprint, so rbasak agreed to take an action to create one. Some
work item assignments were made for the blueprint.
* No other discussion was requir
I will be on vacation next week so will miss the IRC meeting. I had
three actions from this week's meeting that I've taken care of:
1) The QA test case merge proposals are now defunct, so there is no
review to do there.
2) I've created the blueprint at
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spe
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 01:26:45PM -0600, Andrew Martin wrote:
> Are there
> any plans to add support for the kGraft/kPatch support available in 4.x series
> kernels in Ubuntu Server 16.04?
The last I heard, Canonical'
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 09:10:44PM +, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> I'm working (in the background) on a new lxd section. I'm writing the draft
> in the github markdown format. I recall there was some discussion on this
> before, so just to make sure - are we still using xml format and the bzr
> tree
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 03:07:17PM -0700, Doug Smythies wrote:
> ... i.e. I don't
> know how to do the due diligence project planning required
> to work towards a go / no go decision.
> Peter Matulis might have a comment.
I think it's OK for us not to d
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 07:51:54PM -0700, Doug Smythies wrote:
> > To be honest, I favour pruning guide to bare essentials,
> > changing what's left to Markdown, and going from there.
> > Putting it all in a git tree on Launchpad would be but a detail.
>
> I've started making systemd related chang
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 02:35:44PM -0700, Seth Arnold wrote:
> I think it is a mistake to add drupal8 to our archives. No one has tended
> to existing versions:
>
> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/drupal6.html
> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/drupal7.html
Review ACTION points from previous meeting
The discussion about "Review ACTION points from previous meeting"
started at 16:00.
No actions from previous meeting.
Development Release
The discussion about "Development Release" started at 16:00.
Release Bugs (16:01)
LINK:
http:/
Hi Nish,
Thank you for fixing the refs issue. A couple more thoughts/surprises:
1) I understand that it's in the definition of what it does, but it
still surprises me a little that a command called "commit" also tags.
I can't think of a better name to call it though.
2) It also surprised me a li
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 01:58:11PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> Presumably I would need to push to the repository before uploading, so
> that the importer will pick up my commit in favour of importing its own
> even after we have it running automatically. I wonder though if it would
>
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 09:17:46AM +0300, Louis Bouchard wrote:
> Is there a specific procedure to include the new releases from debian in the
> existing repo ? Should I just use git-dsc-import of the new source packages
> over
> the existing debian/sid tag ?
I think we just reimport.
--
ubuntu
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 04:00:46PM -0300, Raphael Philipe Mendes da Silva wrote:
> I noticed something odd regarding the network-console: it seems to not
> consider the values set in the preseed file and keeps asking for the
> password in the "Continue installation remotely using SSH" question.
> I
Hi Jeff,
Thank you for getting in touch.
I think the ubuntu-server mailing list is probably more appropriate to
reach the right audience for this discussion, so I'm moving the thread
there. Please reply to ubuntu-server only.
I'm going to skip ahead in your message a bit.
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 a
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 07:06:14AM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> Hi,
> this is a request to make ntp available for the git based merge process.
Done.
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.
Hi Louis,
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 02:29:01PM +0200, Louis Bouchard wrote:
> Could you please import the isc-dhcp package in git ?
I tried, but I got:
...
Importing 4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u2 to debian/wheezy
Importing 4.2.4-4 to debian/sid
Importing 4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u2 to debian/sid
ERROR:root:Ve
Hi Jon,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:35:10AM -0500, Jon Grimm wrote:
> this is a request to make nss available for the git based merge process.
I came back this morning to find that this has failed:
...
Importing 3.12.3.1-0ubuntu0.9.04.2 to ubuntu/jaunty-updates
Importing 3.12.3.1-0ubuntu2 to ubun
Hi Jeff,
Sorry, I just remembered this thread and that I hadn't replied.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 03:06:13PM -0400, Jeff Kaufman wrote:
> > Have you considered adding your module to Ubuntu's repositories? Is
> > there any reason you couldn't maintain them in xenial-backports for the
> > benefit of
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 08:33:43AM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> That said could one please make this available via the importer process?
> Last import might have been done with the process already, but in the days
> before it was "a process".
> Yet if any of you (Robie?) has the old logical s
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:12:09PM -0400, Jim Tarvid wrote:
> Is this a plymouth problem or rsyslogd?
I can't be at all sure, but those two (apparent) problems feel unrelated
to me. Possibly to each other, and possibly to your problem. I would
look further for a common root cause. Could there be s
Hi Soren,
Please could you change the owner and administrator of ~ubuntu-server-qa
(https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-server-qa) over to ~ubuntu-server-dev?
We'd like to use this group for Server QA purposes rather than create
Yet Another Team, but need to make some admin changes.
Thanks,
Robie
--
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 01:33:39PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> Hi! Could you please import claws-mail into ~usd-import-team? I'm
> generally the person to merge with new Debian releases and we'll
> almost always carry a delta from it.
Done!
https://git.launchpad.net/~usd-import-team/ubuntu/+so
Summary: in Ubuntu, I'd like to leave ntpdate and its bugs behind, since
we don't use it any more.
(I've Bcc'd the Debian NTP Team because it seemed appropriate to stay
connected and for them to be aware of this discussion, but I don't
expect any action from Debian on this - this is mostly a discu
Review ACTION points from previous meeting
The discussion about "Review ACTION points from previous meeting"
started at 16:00.
Development Release
The discussion about "Development Release" started at 16:02.
LINK: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/YakketyYak/ReleaseSchedule
LINK:
http://reqorts.
Review ACTION points from previous meeting
The discussion about "Review ACTION points from previous meeting"
started at 16:00.
ACTION: cpaelzer and rbasak to review new triaging section in
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/KnowledgeBase
LINK: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/YakketyYak/ReleaseSc
Now available from the new ppa:uvtool-dev/master:
* --insecure is no longer required
* Snapshots now work (thanks to Chris Arges)
* New --no-start option (thanks to Tycho Andersen)
* "wait" no longer hangs in a race with a newer dnsmasq
I've moved uvtool development to git on Launchpad, with a ne
I'm catching up on outstanding admin, having failed to write up minutes
from server team meetings promptly. You can see the minutes and full
meeting logs at:
https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2016/ubuntu-meeting.2016-12-20-16.03.html
https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-me
== Meeting information ==
* #ubuntu-meeting: ubuntu-server-team, 14 Feb at 16:00 — 16:34 UTC
* Full logs at
[[http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2017/ubuntu-meeting.2017-02-14-16.00.log.html]]
== Meeting summary ==
=== Review ACTION points from previous meeting ===
The discussi
Hi Eliezer,
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:52:14AM +0200, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> And worked fine for quite some time.
> The latest Xenial kernel from the upgrade (4.4.0-66-generic) causes a very
> specific issue.
> VM's with virtio nic cannot contact the network.(e1000 works fine)
> I have not delv
== Meeting information ==
* #ubuntu-meeting: ubuntu-server-meeting, 28 Mar at 16:03 — 16:23 UTC
* Full logs at
[[http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2017/ubuntu-meeting.2017-03-28-16.03.log.html]]
== Meeting summary ==
=== Review ACTION points from previous meeting ===
The dis
A bunch of Canonical staff who are on the team are unexpectedly
unavailable in an internal Canonical meeting right now, so consensus in
#ubuntu-meeting has been to cancel today's meeting. We expect the next
meeting to be at the same time next week.
Robie
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Launchpad has had the ability to do Git to Git imports for a while.
Yesterday I put this together with it's PPA daily build facility for
rudimentary automatic daily builds against mysql-5.7/debian/master from
mysql.git on Alioth.
You can get the current build from
https://launchpad.net/~mysql-ubun
== Meeting information ==
* #ubuntu-meeting: ubuntu-server, 13 Jun at 16:01 — 16:12 UTC
* Full logs at
[[http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2017/ubuntu-meeting.2017-06-13-16.01.log.html]]
== Meeting summary ==
=== Review ACTION points from previous meeting ===
The discussion
On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 01:39:02AM -0700, Logan Rosen wrote:
> I'm sending an email to request that the scim-chewing package be imported
> to Git so that I can work on a merge using this workflow.
Done.
Robie
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:02:43PM +0300, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Thanks Robie for this. I documented this quickly at
> https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/MySQL/AutomaticBuildsFromGit so that the
> information is more findable by others in the future.
Good idea. Thanks!
signature.asc
Description: PG
== Meeting information ==
* #ubuntu-meeting: ubuntu-server-team, 29 Aug at 16:00 — 16:21 UTC
* Full logs at
[[http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2017/ubuntu-meeting.2017-08-29-16.00.log.html]]
== Meeting summary ==
=== Review ACTION points from previous meeting ===
The discus
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 09:40:07AM -0600, Leroy Tennison wrote:
> With all the news, just wondering, hope this is the right place to ask.
See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/KnowledgeBase/SpectreAndMeltdown
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-serv
I'd like to draw attention to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/1601997
IRC discussion:
https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2018/03/13/%23ubuntu-devel.html#t12:05
tl;dr: by doing nothing we're implicitly breaking some filesystem
forward compatibility. I'd like us to make an explici
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 09:49:17PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> It's not ideal for an interface to go from unsupported to mandatory in a
> single LTS cycle; but I don't believe that the use case of creating a
> filesystem with one LTS release, then interacting with it using the
> userspace tools
1 - 100 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
