On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:57 AM, set wrote:
>
> Do we have a trace of the written permission from canonical to use the
> brand? If so, does it need to be renewed?
>
> Not that I know of or have seen. Ttoine would probably have the best
knowledge as he was dabbling with all
On 2016-01-08 10:57, set wrote:
> I have no interest in ownership of my contribution to
> ubuntu-studio, meaning; if canonical would, for whatever reason chose a
> direction that would render ubuntu-studio unuseable for me, i would give
> my thanks for the experience acquired and focus my output
I've done some cleaning up of our artwork branch, and set up a new
routine for us when dealing with artwork material.
There are now three branches as you can see here
https://code.launchpad.net/ubuntustudio-artwork
Before I explain a bit more, I want to clarify one thing about the LP
urls.