Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Art Team: Ubuntustudio Design Assets questions

2016-01-08 Thread Jimmy Sjölund
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:57 AM, set wrote: > > Do we have a trace of the written permission from canonical to use the > brand? If so, does it need to be renewed? > > Not that I know of or have seen. Ttoine would probably have the best knowledge as he was dabbling with all

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Art Team: Ubuntustudio Design Assets questions

2016-01-08 Thread set
On 2016-01-08 10:57, set wrote: > I have no interest in ownership of my contribution to > ubuntu-studio, meaning; if canonical would, for whatever reason chose a > direction that would render ubuntu-studio unuseable for me, i would give > my thanks for the experience acquired and focus my output

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Art Team: Ubuntustudio Design Assets questions

2016-01-08 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
I've done some cleaning up of our artwork branch, and set up a new routine for us when dealing with artwork material. There are now three branches as you can see here https://code.launchpad.net/ubuntustudio-artwork Before I explain a bit more, I want to clarify one thing about the LP urls.