On 09/23/2018 07:45 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 16:09:33 -0700, Hank Stanglow wrote:
growing emphasis on Snaps
But even if you stay with Ubuntu and snaps, it's not easy to use it for
pro-audio software, if possible at all.
The point I was trying to make is the distribution
On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 16:09:33 -0700, Hank Stanglow wrote:
>growing emphasis on Snaps
It's just a growing hype from a minority of Ubuntu developers
involved in snap development.
"Search thousands of snaps used by millions of people across 50 Linux
distributions"
https://snapcraft.io/store
Hi. I have been following Ubuntu Studio since 2011 and it holds a
special place in my heart. I am sad to see development slow down, but I
also feel like changes in the way software is packaged and distributed
made this inevitable.
I stopped using Ubuntu Studio a couple years ago for a few
Hi Erich and everyone else reading,
-‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, September 21, 2018 5:55 PM, Erich Eickmeyer wrote:
> My proposal is to keep Ubuntu Studio's ISO as Xfce, but to develop
> metapackages that bolt Ubuntu Studio on to an existing install of
> another flavor.
I'm going
On Sun, 23 Sep 2018, ttoine wrote:
involved (MOTU and other people like that for Ubuntu). More, in some open source
projects, only committers can vote on strategic decisions, and it's bad when
they
ignore theirs users or don't understand a specific emerging use of their
project.
That's why
Hi Ross,
On 9/21/2018 2:03 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> Hi Erich, On 09/21/2018 05:55 PM, Erich Eickmeyer wrote:
>> Hi everybody, As many of you know, Eylul stepped-down from the core
>> leadership of Ubuntu Studio on Saturday. With Eylul's departure, we
>> lost one of our key developers. She had
Erich,
Thank you for your message. Reading it hurts a bit, but I agree with you on
most points. That's actually a common issue in open source: if you have a
team with project manager, UX designer, documentation writer, or beta
testers, at some point, your project can't exist if there is no coder,
