Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Candace

On Tue, 3 Apr 2018, Ralf Mardorf wrote: If a user gets the setup right in the first place, there seldom is the need for cheap workarounds such as a bridge to pulseaudio. Which one is the "cheap workaround" is a matter of opinion. Note, it doesn't matter what distro I prefer to use myself,

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Candace

Pulseaudio often isn't needed at all and furthermore it has got counter-productive effects for most professional audio work. For workarounds there is software such as apulse, see https://github.com/i-rinat/apulse , let alone that some apps such as Firefox support alsa, as well as jack, just build

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Candace

I've always used qjackctl if I needed to set up something non-default in jack, had little trouble with it. Even used it on a netbook for a while to set up sound to deal with mono files (not supported in harware on that machine) by running jack, which was much lighter on that machine running

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Candace

Hi Thomas, > On Apr 2, 2018, at 10:08 AM, Thomas Pfundt wrote: > > On April 2, 2018 4:33 PM, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: >> FalkTX has just released Cadence v0.9.0, having finished porting it to Qt5. >> This would definitely be another reason we

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Candace

On April 2, 2018 4:33 PM, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: > FalkTX has just released Cadence v0.9.0, having finished porting it to Qt5. > This would definitely be another reason we should consider moving from > QJackCtl to Cadence, along with the extra tools Cadence includes.

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Candace

> On Apr 2, 2018, at 8:32 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > Here we go: > > http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntustudio/releases/ All this does is point to the ISO repos. This adds nothing to your argument. > Upgrading from one to another release, should still allow you to

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Candace

Here we go: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntustudio/releases/ Upgrading from one to another release, should still allow you to continue using Ubuntu Studio without major inconveniences. If newcomers would be allowed to overturn basal preconditions, completely ignoring backwards compatibility with

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Candace

> On Apr 2, 2018, at 7:44 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > On Mon, 2 Apr 2018 07:33:05 -0700, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: >> moving from QJackCtl to Cadence > > Dropping QjackCtl in favour of Cadence? If so, that's utter nonsense! There’s no need to be rude, it was just an

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Candace

On Mon, 2 Apr 2018 07:33:05 -0700, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: >moving from QJackCtl to Cadence Dropping QjackCtl in favour of Cadence? If so, that's utter nonsense! You could provide Cadence, but you cannot move/migrate from QjackCtl to Cadence, since this would break the workflow for a majority of

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Candace

> On Mar 31, 2018, at 4:56 AM, eylul wrote: > > I believe this was in our todo list. :) Some of the changes FalkTX is making > might actually make it easier for these to be included in the debian repos. > Another option is to see if we can get it into ubuntu repos. >

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Candace

I believe this was in our todo list. :) Some of the changes FalkTX is making might actually make it easier for these to be included in the debian repos. Another option is to see if we can get it into ubuntu repos. Best Eylul On 03/30/2018 08:06 PM, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: > > >> On Mar 30,

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Candace

> On Mar 30, 2018, at 7:17 AM, Set Hallström wrote: > > On March 30, 2018 4:12:34 PM GMT+02:00, Set Sakrecoer > wrote: >> On March 30, 2018 12:17:51 PM GMT+02:00, Lord Jonathan Moore >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was looking at

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Candace

On March 30, 2018 4:12:34 PM GMT+02:00, Set Sakrecoer wrote: >On March 30, 2018 12:17:51 PM GMT+02:00, Lord Jonathan Moore > wrote: >>Hi, >> >>I was looking at the replace-qjackctl-a blueprint and think Candace >>would >>be better it is faster to use than

[ubuntu-studio-devel] Candace

Hi, I was looking at the replace-qjackctl-a blueprint and think Candace would be better it is faster to use than patchage. And looks more organized with a ladish session. I would like an opinion on ladish vs jack, Thanks, jdm7dv -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list