[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 752157] Re: [RS880] graphical corruption in launcher (Solid grey rectangles over icon text and window borders)

2011-06-08 Thread eapache
I did see this consistently on my natty install, however I got to natty from lucid by way of maverick, so I don't know where my graphics stack was at that point (didn't do anything fancy with it though, so presumably it went to Gallium and I didn't notice). Since that box is oneiric now, it's too

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 752157] Re: [RS880] graphical corruption in launcher (Solid grey rectangles over icon text and window borders)

2011-05-30 Thread eapache
Just upgraded to Oneiric (I know, I'm crazy), and this bug has disappeared. A little poking around indicates that the open-source ati stack in Oneiric has switched to gallium by default instead of mesa, which is probably why I'm not seeing this anymore. I don't know if that switch is one we're

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 578460] Re: [Karmic, Lucid] 82G33/G31 Card Fails to detect proper resolutions

2010-06-18 Thread eapache
Very peculiar. I managed to get my hands on a second machine with the same graphics card, and it works fine (using the exact same monitor). Here's the card's section of lspci on the second machine: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82G33/G31 Express Integrated Graphics

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 584714] Re: Radeon 2600XT poor performance after suspend-to-ram

2010-06-09 Thread eapache
I suspend/resume frequently, and this has only happened a few more times since I reported the bug, but I've noticed something very interesting. Normally upon resume, my monitor displays garbage in the form of ~15 horizontal light and dark stripes of static. This happens for about a second,

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 578460] Re: [Karmic, Lucid] 82G33/G31 Card Fails to detect proper resolutions

2010-06-02 Thread eapache
A little more progress. Disabling kernel mode-setting (with nomodeset in grub) seems to consistently force it into the state described by comment #2 (correctly named, with an even smaller list of available resolutions). -- [Karmic,Lucid] 82G33/G31 Card Fails to detect proper resolutions

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 584714] [NEW] Radeon 2600XT poor performance after suspend-to-ram

2010-05-23 Thread eapache
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg Up-to-date 10.04. Fresh Install. ATI Radeon 2600XT. Open-source driver. Kernel modesetting enabled (assumed from the 1440x900 plymouth resolution) This is an r600 card, so lucid is the first release with open-source 3D. While the performance isn't

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 584714] Re: Radeon 2600XT poor performance after suspend-to-ram

2010-05-23 Thread eapache
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48983539/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48983540/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48983541/Dependencies.txt **

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 584714] Re: Radeon 2600XT poor performance after suspend-to-ram

2010-05-23 Thread eapache
Since the glxinfo line from apport gives an error instead of any information, I am attaching the output of running 'glxinfo' in the bad state. I hope it's useful. ** Attachment added: glxinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48984614/glxinfo.txt ** Description changed: Binary package

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 578460] Re: [Karmic, Lucid] 82G33/G31 Card Fails to detect proper resolutions

2010-05-11 Thread eapache
Oddly enough, after three reboots the situation has changed slightly. Now the monitor is detected 'correctly' (it is listed as a Dell 22 Inch instead of unknown), but the list of resolutions is even worse than before. It can only go up to 1024x768, and has no 16x9 or 16x10 resolutions available.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 578460] Re: [Karmic, Lucid] 82G33/G31 Card Fails to detect proper resolutions

2010-05-11 Thread eapache
And after another reboot it's back to the old behavior. I'll try and nail down what causes the different behaviors, but at this point it seems completely random. -- [Karmic,Lucid] 82G33/G31 Card Fails to detect proper resolutions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578460 You received this bug

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 578460] [NEW] [Karmic, Lucid] 82G33/G31 Card Fails to detect proper resolutions

2010-05-10 Thread eapache
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg Started at Jaunty, everything worked great. Upgraded to Karmic yesterday, saw the issue. Upgraded to lucid today, the issue persists. The monitor should be at 1680x1050. The PreferencesMonitors dialog reports the current resolution as 1360x768,

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 578460] Re: [Karmic, Lucid] 82G33/G31 Card Fails to detect proper resolutions

2010-05-10 Thread eapache
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48232708/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48232709/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48232710/Dependencies.txt **

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 368271] Re: [RV630-XT] (Needs 8.602) Memory leak in fglrx

2009-06-28 Thread eapache
Thank you, the x-updates ppa is a little more comforting to use than xorg-edgers :) -- [RV630-XT] (Needs 8.602) Memory leak in fglrx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368271 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 368271] Re: [RV630-XT] (Needs 8.602) Memory leak in fglrx

2009-06-27 Thread eapache
It is definitely fixed. Any chance of this getting an SRU in Jaunty? -- [RV630-XT] (Needs 8.602) Memory leak in fglrx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368271 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 368271] Re: [RV630-XT] (Needs 8.602) Memory leak in fglrx

2009-06-26 Thread eapache
The packages in the ppa do not appear to be affected by this bug. I haven't spent a huge amount of time with them yet, but they should be OK. I'll report back in a few days when I have some serious uptime under my belt. -- [RV630-XT] (Needs 8.602) Memory leak in fglrx