I should add that this updated patch addresses Rich's points: 1) I've
tested this for both dynamic and static linking and I tested that
libressl builds and works correctly. 2) I added a link to the musl
commit for the reasoning behind this approach.
On 07/22/14 13:27,
On 7/22/2014 11:30 PM, Steve Bennett wrote: I would like to add my
support to Thomas' position.
Regardless of what happens with glibc and/or musl, an active community
supporting regular releases of uClibc is a good thing.
Time has spoken that we can't expect this to happen unless something
Il 23 luglio 2014 13:42:38 Jody Bruchon j...@jodybruchon.com ha scritto:
On 7/22/2014 11:30 PM, Steve Bennett wrote: I would like to add my
support to Thomas' position.
Regardless of what happens with glibc and/or musl, an active community
supporting regular releases of uClibc is a good
