On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 15:06 +0300, Cristi Magherusan wrote:
Are there any plans to include aio support in uClibc soon or should I do
it myself? If so, which difficulty do you estimate for this task?
I took a look at the code of uClibc and glibc and it seems trivial.
I'll soon make a patch
Hello,
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 11:26 +0200, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
From a short glance, we want the exact opposite: No stubs but the real
implementation.
Afaik, there are no public aio_*() syscalls offered by the kernel, and
even glibc has only stubs and no real implementation.
Also in my POV
Hello,
It seems my original patch had some errors. The attached patch is fixing
those and is very close to what glibc has, except glibc's stub warnings.
If you really think it should be made a single file, I'll do it later.
Best regards,
Cristi
diff -Naur uClibc-0.9.29/extra/Configs/Config.in
Hello,
I noticed that the gentoo uclibc ebuild[1] applies a considerable amount
of patches[2]. Has anyone investigated how many of them worth including
in the main uclibc tree? Personally, I'm most interested about the libm
ones, but the other ones may be nice to have too.
Best regards,
Cristi
Hello,
On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 12:15 +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Cristi Magherusan wrote:
Hello,
I noticed that the gentoo uclibc ebuild[1] applies a considerable amount
of patches[2]. Has anyone investigated how many of them worth including
in the main uclibc tree? Personally, I'm
Hello,
On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 10:12 -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
On 8/11/2008 8:58 AM, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
Cristi Magherusan wrote:
The ones I know for sure that are missing both from the latest release and
CVS
are the ones that add those extra functions to libm, and that I really
Hello,
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 13:14 +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Cristi Magherusan wrote:
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 08:34 +0200, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
Cristi Magherusan wrote:
Hello,
Can anyone tell which revision of the NPTL branch is tested and
confirmed to work well on x86?
None
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 18:53 +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:17:39AM -0500, Kevin Day wrote:
gcc-4.3.1 seems to need fenv.h, or more specifically information from
within bits/fenv.h.
Because bits/fenv.h should not be directly included a stub fenv.h
needs to
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 12:15 +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 02:01:58PM +0400, Vladimir Dronnikov wrote:
Hi,
Where from can I download fresh rootfs for x86? Or this is not supported
any more?
I have this:
http://repo.or.cz/w/buildroot.git/
I'd be glad to
Hello,
Is there anyone interested in porting the NPTL branch to x86/x86-64?
Regards,
Cristi
--
Ing. Cristi Măgherușan, System/Network Engineer
Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania
http://cc.utcluj.ro +40264 401247
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hello,
On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 01:33 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 10 April 2009 01:07:52 Timo Teräs wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 09 April 2009 10:24:53 Cristi Magherusan wrote:
Is there anyone interested in porting the NPTL branch to x86/x86-64?
always
Hello,
I'm attempting to compile the x86 version of uClibc-nptl using buildroot
(it compiles by itself). I have modified buildroot a bit to allow it
fetch my uClibc nptl snapshot, patched using Timo's x86 patch, but I'm
having some compilation issues.
It seems currently the x86 version won't
On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 15:21 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 04 June 2009 08:33:34 Ingo van Lil wrote:
The __syscall_error() function stores the errno value in the edx
register before invoking the __set_errno() macro. When using the
pthread library this macro calls thread_self() to
On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 19:18 +0430, Rolf wrote:
I downloaded, configured and built the 'buildroot-2009.05' system
and used the resulting 'rootfs' images to boot a stripped down kernel.
Great job 'uClibc' 'busybox' teams!...great tools!
My question:
I downloaded all of the 'uClibc'
On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 12:12 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 07/07/2009 05:42 AM, Cristi Magherusan wrote:
Hi there,
I'm trying to compile kvm using uClibc instead of glibc.
Besides the fact that kvm needs --extra-ldflags=-lrt (otherwise there
are some missing symbols), there's an error
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 08:13 +0200, Natanael Copa wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 05:42 +0300, Cristi Magherusan wrote:
Hi there,
I'm trying to compile kvm using uClibc instead of glibc.
I upgraded to kvm-87 yesterday. It compiles, kvm is enabled, but guest
hangs when trying to mount
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 18:10 +0800, jason duhamell wrote:
I posted a job to port nationalchip to linux. here is the link.
http://groups.google.com.au/group/szlug/browse_thread/thread/5bd00cc185c48c76
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
17 matches
Mail list logo
