Hello, On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 12:15 +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > Cristi Magherusan wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I noticed that the gentoo uclibc ebuild[1] applies a considerable amount > > of patches[2]. Has anyone investigated how many of them worth including > > in the main uclibc tree? Personally, I'm most interested about the libm > > ones, but the other ones may be nice to have too. > > > > Best regards, > > Cristi > > > > [1] http://www.gentoo-portage.com/AJAX/Ebuild/66923 > > [2] http://mirror.mcs.anl.gov/pub/gentoo/distfiles/ > > uClibc-0.9.28.3-patches-1.8.tar.bz2 > > > > > Being this patch set against 0.9.28 release, that is an old release, > I assume that most of these fixes should be already into the current > main stream. Doing this kind of analysis, even if could shown some > unknown problem, is time consuming. I honestly don't have time for this now.
The ones I know for sure that are missing both from the latest release and CVS are the ones that add those extra functions to libm, and that I really need in order to compile kvm and link it against uClibc. Best regards, Cristi _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
