Hi,
When I go through the DBMX Linux BootLoader Menu, even after I eject the
removable disk it doesn't give me any response. I could't understand the
reason. Is it about Windows XP's USB removable drive support??
This message was
Hi folks,
I am adding usb support to our 5282 based board (the sl811 from
cypress). And when I am compiling the hcd.c file, the compiler complains
about the UTS_SYSNAME definition.
Some time ago it was discussed on the list the problem lies on the lack
of the backslash on the compiler:
Hi Advan,
Is the module crypto loaded? (You may have already
mentioned this...)
Regards,
...doug
--- advan wrote:
hi doug,
thank you very much , wlan_ccmp.o is also a gpl
and bsd license module,
MODULE_LICENSE(Duak BSD/GPL);
I change MODULE_LICENSE(Duak BSD/GPL) to
I made a standard uClinux-2.6.x kernel with nfs module.
In /user/mount compiler stopped with errors.
Probably there are some include problems. I 'm working on 200706021
(but I had the same error in 20070130), there are any patch to fix the
problem?
Thanks,
Max
Start OUTPUT
Hi David,
the strange memory size is because the RAM memory starts at 0x0200.
If I define the memory size correctly (2MB) in the crt0_ram.S the system
doesn't boot.
I looked at the /proc/mem_map and this is the results:
init Mem: 86176 Slack: 470 Shared: 0 Rom:
Sorry David,
this is the real /proc/mem_map output:
0x:
0x0004:
0x0008:
0x000c:
Hi,
I have found the reason that coldfire dropped into exception.
It is because of the timer.
I commented the timer codes and the exception never happened again.
Can anybody who had experience with coldfire dBUG told me why?
Thanks!
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Ron,
--- Ron Jobmann wrote:
Hi
I just downloaded Busybox 1.6.1 to plug into the
Snapgear 3.4.0 tree
(replacing Busybox 1.00 rc3). I found a 'glue
makefile' on this list and
with
some minor adjustments it seems to work OK.
The problem I'm having is I'm compiling for ixp420
I issued 'make user/busybox_only'. The user/Makefile is untouched,
since the busybox directory is the same (busybox vs. busybox-1.6.1)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Kehn
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 11:17 AM
To: uClinux development
Hi everybody,
I´m confused about if possible use shared libraries for uClinux and user
applications when the target it´s an ARM processor. Can anyone help me???
Best regards.
Daniel.
_
Descubre Live.com - tu mundo en línea
10 matches
Mail list logo