On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 07:18, Greg Ungerer g...@snapgear.com wrote:
On 26/05/11 16:38, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
I was more thinking along the lines of !CONFIG_M68000 !CONFIG_M68010
!CONFIG_whatever Coldfire that doesn't support it.
Or in this case (and probably most cases) we could just
Hi Geert,
On 02/06/11 17:43, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 07:18, Greg Ungererg...@snapgear.com wrote:
On 26/05/11 16:38, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
I was more thinking along the lines of !CONFIG_M68000 á!CONFIG_M68010
á!CONFIG_whatever Coldfire that doesn't support
Hi Geert,
On 26/05/11 16:38, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 08:23, Greg Ungererg...@snapgear.com wrote:
On 24/05/11 18:06, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Geert Uytterhoevenge...@linux-m68k.org áwrites:
What exactly do you mean by does not support anything less? It seems it
Hi Andreas, Geert,
On 24/05/11 18:06, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Geert Uytterhoevenge...@linux-m68k.org writes:
What exactly do you mean by does not support anything less? It seems it does
restrict instruction generation to 68000 if you ask for it.
The point is that Linux/m68k requires 68020+,
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 08:23, Greg Ungerer g...@snapgear.com wrote:
On 24/05/11 18:06, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Geert Uytterhoevenge...@linux-m68k.org writes:
What exactly do you mean by does not support anything less? It seems it
does
restrict instruction generation to 68000 if you ask for
Quoth Greg Ungerer:
On 24/05/11 18:06, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Geert Uytterhoevenge...@linux-m68k.org writes:
What exactly do you mean by does not support anything less? It
seems it does restrict instruction generation to 68000 if you
ask for it.
The point is that Linux/m68k
Hi Gavin,
On 26/05/11 17:28, Gavin Lambert wrote:
Quoth Greg Ungerer:
On 24/05/11 18:06, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Geert Uytterhoevenge...@linux-m68k.org writes:
What exactly do you mean by does not support anything less? It
seems it does restrict instruction generation to 68000 if you
ask
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 21:54, Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org writes:
FWIW, my m68k-linux-gnu-gcc (4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease)) always defines
__mc68000__ and __mc68020__, even when specifying -m68000 on the command
line.
m68k-linux has
On 24/05/11 05:54, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Geert Uytterhoevenge...@linux-m68k.org writes:
FWIW, my m68k-linux-gnu-gcc (4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease)) always defines
__mc68000__ and __mc68020__, even when specifying -m68000 on the command
line.
m68k-linux has always defined __mc68020__
