On Wednesday 22 April 2009 04:29:41 Jamie Lokier wrote:
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Bittornado is python. Does python run on uclinux?
I read enough of a rumour that Python doesn't run on MMU-less uClinux
that I didn't bother to try.
I guess it might work on MMU-less architectures with
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 16:19:56 Jamie Lokier wrote:
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:05:13PM +1000, David McCullough wrote:
There's a good reason that only sash and the minix shell work on !MMU,
and the initially the minix shell needed a fair bit of work to make
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 02:47:16AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
msh blows. few doesnt even cover it.
Well it was better than sash, which didn't do pipes or backticks or most
other things. Not many choices on nommu after all.
however, lets forget about the past. Denys has done a lot of work
Bittornado is python. Does python run on uclinux?
Some time ago I did a very primitive test with Python on uCLinux for
NIOS. Python did compile and I could type 1+1 and got 2.
-Michael
___
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
Voslak vos...@gmail.com
To: uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 5:28 PM
Subject: [uClinux-dev] torrent client
No I would rather think about a client that does not require a
webserver. I do not have a webserver and I don't want to do one in
order to get torrentflux running
On Monday 27 April 2009 10:52:51 Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 02:47:16AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
msh blows. few doesnt even cover it.
Well it was better than sash, which didn't do pipes or backticks or most
other things. Not many choices on nommu after all.
being
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 18:28:23 Peter Voslak wrote:
No I would rather think about a client that does not require a
webserver. I do not have a webserver and I don't want to do one in
order to get torrentflux running (or any other client).
i havent tried it, but i imagine ctorrent (enhanced)
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:08:25PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
being better than something else does make it good ;)
Good enough then? Better than nothing? :)
if i were to do something crazy like go to http://busybox.net/, one might
think the answer obvious ...
Well that seems to indicate
On Monday 27 April 2009 13:14:11 Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:08:25PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
if i were to do something crazy like go to http://busybox.net/, one might
think the answer obvious ...
Well that seems to indicate 1.14.0 is released, but that it is
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Bittornado is python. Does python run on uclinux?
I read enough of a rumour that Python doesn't run on MMU-less uClinux
that I didn't bother to try.
I guess it might work on MMU-less architectures with FDPIC-ELF,
and of course uClinux tends to include MMUs now.
--
Jivin Jamie Lokier lays it down ...
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Bittornado is python. Does python run on uclinux?
I read enough of a rumour that Python doesn't run on MMU-less uClinux
that I didn't bother to try.
I guess it might work on MMU-less architectures with FDPIC-ELF,
and of
David McCullough wrote:
I read enough of a rumour that Python doesn't run on MMU-less uClinux
that I didn't bother to try.
I guess it might work on MMU-less architectures with FDPIC-ELF,
and of course uClinux tends to include MMUs now.
Actually, it has little to do with the
Jivin Jamie Lokier lays it down ...
David McCullough wrote:
I read enough of a rumour that Python doesn't run on MMU-less uClinux
that I didn't bother to try.
I guess it might work on MMU-less architectures with FDPIC-ELF,
and of course uClinux tends to include MMUs now.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 01:14:00PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
I was more thinking of all those loadable modules. Without FDPIC-ELF
there's no dlopen() and no (useful) shared libs.
Hmm, FDPIC ELF sounds a lot more useful than FLAT. I wonder if it would
be possible to add FDPIC support to m68k
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:05:13PM +1000, David McCullough wrote:
There's a good reason that only sash and the minix shell work on !MMU,
and the initially the minix shell needed a fair bit of work to make safe
on !MMU :-)
Seems to work very well now though.
--
Len Sorensen
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:05:13PM +1000, David McCullough wrote:
There's a good reason that only sash and the minix shell work on !MMU,
and the initially the minix shell needed a fair bit of work to make safe
on !MMU :-)
Seems to work very well now though.
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 01:14:00PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
I was more thinking of all those loadable modules. Without FDPIC-ELF
there's no dlopen() and no (useful) shared libs.
Hmm, FDPIC ELF sounds a lot more useful than FLAT. I wonder if it would
be possible
No I would rather think about a client that does not require a
webserver. I do not have a webserver and I don't want to do one in
order to get torrentflux running (or any other client).
Thanks PV
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Re: uClinux-dev Digest, Vol 71, Issue 22 (John Master)
I don't know
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:28:23PM +0100, Peter Voslak wrote:
No I would rather think about a client that does not require a
webserver. I do not have a webserver and I don't want to do one in
order to get torrentflux running (or any other client).
Bittornado is python. Does python run on
Never researched it, so ... I don't know
--
From: Lennart Sorensen lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 10:09 AM
To: uClinux development list uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] torrent client
On Tue, Apr 21
20 matches
Mail list logo
