[uClinux-dev] thttpd

2007-02-13 Thread Bernd Büttner
Hi, did someone port the actual version (2.25b) of thttpd? Bernd ___ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see:

Re: [uClinux-dev] thttpd

2007-02-23 Thread Bernd Büttner
Gavin Lambert schrieb: Quoth Bernd Büttner [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Gavin Lambert schrieb: Quoth Bernd Büttner [EMAIL PROTECTED]: did someone port the actual version (2.25b) of thttpd? Yep, I've got that one running on my system. Not sure how sane the code is, but it seems to work ok

[uClinux-dev] make clean doesn't work on linux directory

2007-03-05 Thread Bernd Büttner
I'm working with it for a while now but I didn't recognize. Doing a 'make clean' works on all directories but linux-kernel. My distribution is 20060803. Building linux-2.6 with m68knommu kernel (modified motorola M5282EVB). I think the problem is in arch/m68knommu/Makefile. The rule for

Re: [uClinux-dev] make clean doesn't work on linux directory

2007-03-05 Thread Bernd Büttner
I found more problems in using distclean. There are 3 symlinks pointing to an absolute target which are not deleted. $(ROOTDIR)/lib/uClibc $(ROOTDIR)/tools/ucfront-g++ $(ROOTDIR)/tools/ucfront-gcc My goal is to put the package under version control (subversion in my case) and when are remaining

[uClinux-dev] problems with uClinux-dist-20070130

2007-03-12 Thread Bernd Büttner
Hi all, I'm working on the 20060803 distribution for some time. Now I want to switch to the newest distribution (20070130). In the first stage I used a predefined configuration (Freescale M5282EVB) to eliminate my faults. The first 'make' (after make xconfig for vendor) stopped while producing

[uClinux-dev] Busybox in 20070130 distribution

2007-04-02 Thread Bernd Büttner
, Bernd Büttner ___ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev

Re: [uClinux-dev] Linux mtd-utils updated to latest release.

2007-04-03 Thread Bernd Büttner
Hi Glen, Glen Johnson schrieb: uClinux-dev, In the past I tried to bring the latest and greatest mtd-utils code into the uClinux-dist. I finally got back to it and have it compiling. Attached are the files which contain the changes that I made to make this happen. The hardest piece of this

[uClinux-dev] cache fault in coldfire 5282 design

2007-10-25 Thread Bernd Büttner
Hi, I'm porting uCLinux to our own design with Coldfire 5282 CPU and NAND-FLASH. I'm using 20070130 distibution. In 'CACHE_ENABLE' are SDRAM and (internal)FLASH defined as cacheable and all other areas as non-cacheable. FLASH is defined for a fixed address, but I think every design will have it

[uClinux-dev] missing sys_write and sys_ioctl

2008-03-27 Thread Bernd Büttner
Hi, I have device driver modules which are not compiled-in, but loaded at system startup. One module must have access to the devices of the other module. This second module is a standard qspi driver which I don't want to modify. So I open a qspi devices via sys_open and then tried to access it

Re: [uClinux-dev] missing sys_write and sys_ioctl (question modified)

2008-03-31 Thread Bernd Büttner
Hi, I'm using distribution 20070130 on platform m68knommu. In my device driver that is loaded during startup, not compiled in, I must use sys_open, sys_close, sys_read, sys_write and sys_ioctl. sys_write and sys_ioctl are not exported. Is it ok to add following lines to m68k_ksyms.c:

Re: [uClinux-dev] missing sys_write and sys_ioctl (question modified)

2008-03-31 Thread Bernd Büttner
Bongani Hlope schrieb: On Monday 31 March 2008 11:04:13 Bernd Büttner wrote: Hi, I'm using distribution 20070130 on platform m68knommu. In my device driver that is loaded during startup, not compiled in, I must use sys_open, sys_close, sys_read, sys_write and sys_ioctl. sys_write and sys_ioctl

Re: [uClinux-dev] missing sys_write and sys_ioctl (question modified)

2008-03-31 Thread Bernd Büttner
Bongani Hlope schrieb: On Monday 31 March 2008 11:50:12 Bernd Büttner wrote: Bongani Hlope schrieb: On Monday 31 March 2008 11:04:13 Bernd Büttner wrote: Hi, I'm using distribution 20070130 on platform m68knommu. In my device driver that is loaded during startup, not compiled in, I must use

Re: [uClinux-dev] missing sys_write and sys_ioctl (question modified)

2008-03-31 Thread Bernd Büttner
Bongani Hlope schrieb: On Monday 31 March 2008 13:47:23 Bernd Büttner wrote: Bongani Hlope schrieb: 8 You really shouldn't be doing that in a module, that is why those symbols are not exported. But if you really insist on reading/writing a file in a kernel module look here: http

Re: [uClinux-dev] missing sys_write and sys_ioctl (question modified)

2008-03-31 Thread Bernd Büttner
Bongani Hlope schrieb: At the moment I'm using the qspi-driver: drivers/char/mcf_qspi.c which is a 'normal' character driver with open/close read/write functions, no spi_sync. I don't need a spi subsystem. But what I've seen a few minutes ago is that under the directory drivers/spi

[uClinux-dev] appWeb

2008-05-29 Thread Bernd Büttner
Hi, has anyone ported the actual appWeb (version 2.4.2) to uClinux (distribution 20070130)? I tried it but is doesn't even compile. What I did: - copy actual appWeb to user/appWeb - enable with make xconfig - run make The file .sgbuild_user is created and that's all for that directory. What I

Re: [uClinux-dev] appWeb

2008-06-03 Thread Bernd Büttner
No answer. Does that mean that no one did it yet and I shouldn't do so either? I need a webserver with ssi and cgi support. At the moment I use thttpd, but the support for ssi/cgi is not complete, it does not work with a .htpasswd file. Any suggestions? Bernd Bernd Büttner schrieb: Hi, has

Re: [uClinux-dev] subversion folders in uClinux/dist/patches

2008-10-24 Thread Bernd Büttner
Many thanks to Erwin and Greg, Bernd ___ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see:

Re: [uClinux-dev] subversion folders in uClinux/dist/patches

2008-11-06 Thread Bernd Büttner
Hi Greg, sorry for the delay, had some other things to do. I tested the 20081030 patch. There are still some '.svn' entries in the user/clamav tree. I extracted them with awk (as Erwin told me to do) and then it works for me. Bernd Greg Ungerer schrieb: Hi Bernd, Bernd Büttner wrote

Re: [uClinux-dev] subversion folders in uClinux/dist/patches

2009-01-16 Thread Bernd Büttner
Hi Greg, I'm so sorry but there are still some in the directories: user/clamav/shared user/clamav/.split In the meantime I created an awk-file that removes them, so don't worry. Many thanks anyway Bernd Greg Ungerer schrieb: Hi Bernd, Bernd Büttner wrote: sorry for the delay, had some

Re: [uClinux-dev] cannot create ntpdate with distribution 20080808

2009-04-06 Thread Bernd Büttner
ping is this a silly question? Bernd Büttner schrieb: I'm trying to switch from 20070130 distribution to 20080808 with 20090312 patch. Platform is Coldfire 5282 (no mmu). uClibc has a new compiler-switch named __ARCH_USE_MMU__ and therefore 'fork' is no more available. The result

Re: [uClinux-dev] cannot create ntpdate with distribution 20080808

2009-04-06 Thread Bernd Büttner
I know that, this isn't new to me, too. But with the older distribution I enabled ntpdate and iperf and it just worked. I think the uClibc resolved it. With the new distribution no executables are created for the above programs. And I believe it is related to changes in the uClibc with the new

Re: [uClinux-dev] cannot create ntpdate with distribution 20080808

2009-04-06 Thread Bernd Büttner
So the new compiler switch in the uClibc is a bug-fix. Does anyone know which programs run under no-mmu systems and which have to be touched? Bernd Michael Schnell schrieb: My question now is, must I convert an unknown number of utilities by myself or is there another new compiler switch

[uClinux-dev] Toolchain problem with latest update patch

2009-05-13 Thread Bernd Büttner
Hello all, trying to switch to dist20080808 I'm running into a toolchain problem. My platform is m68knommu (coldfire 528x) and I'm using toolchain m68k-uclinux-tools-20061214.sh (latest at uclinux.org) Trying to compile dist20080808 with latest patch uClinux-dist-20080808-20090423 results in an

[uClinux-dev] atomic_set_mask/atomic_clear_mask

2009-05-13 Thread Bernd Büttner
Hi all, my platform: m68knommu ditribution 20070130 and 20080808 Using atomic_set_mask and atomic_clear_mask I ran into an assembler error. Doing the following patch helped me out: Index: linux-2.6.x/include/asm-m68knommu/atomic.h

Re: [uClinux-dev] atomic_set_mask/atomic_clear_mask

2009-05-13 Thread Bernd Büttner
Hi Alexander, Alexander Stein schrieb: Hello Bernd, Am Mittwoch, 13. Mai 2009 09:41:14 schrieb Bernd Büttner: my platform: m68knommu ditribution 20070130 and 20080808 Using atomic_set_mask and atomic_clear_mask I ran into an assembler error. Doing the following patch helped me out: Index

Re: [uClinux-dev] Toolchain problem with latest update patch

2009-05-13 Thread Bernd Büttner
No, in production we still work with dist 20070130. I'm trying to switch to the newer one. With patch 20080808-20090416 I get an image, with the newest patch not. John Trostel schrieb: Did you figure out how to get around this problem yet? Bernd Büttner wrote: Hello all, trying to switch

Re: [uClinux-dev] Toolchain problem with latest update patch

2009-05-13 Thread Bernd Büttner
challenges you'll encounter. Best regards, Matt - Original Message From: Bernd Büttner b.buett...@mkc-gmbh.de To: uclinux-dev@uclinux.org Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 1:18:42 AM Subject: [uClinux-dev] Toolchain problem with latest update patch Hello all, trying to switch to dist20080808

Re: [uClinux-dev] atomic_set_mask/atomic_clear_mask

2009-05-13 Thread Bernd Büttner
Hi Alexander, I'm feeling a bit sheepish about it, but I don't know how to get it. Bernd Alexander Stein schrieb: Hello bernd, Am Mittwoch, 13. Mai 2009 14:44:19 schrieb Bernd Büttner: This is not the point. I do use constants. Example: #define R_FLAGS_INIT0x0004 atomic_clear_mask

Re: [uClinux-dev] atomic_set_mask/atomic_clear_mask

2009-05-14 Thread Bernd Büttner
this with the assembler code that produces no error, but I don't know how to generate this. He told me to have a look at the ELF file. But there is no. Regards Bernd Greg Ungerer schrieb: Hi Bernd, Bernd Büttner wrote: my platform: m68knommu ditribution 20070130 and 20080808 Using atomic_set_mask

Re: [uClinux-dev] Toolchain problem with latest update patch

2009-05-27 Thread Bernd Büttner
The new Codesourcery toolchain ran into an error while configuring a library. (uClinux-dist-20080808 with 20090423 patch). Here the part of the make output: [ -z libpcap zlib ] ||\ make -j1 libpcap zlib || exit $? which: no m68k-uclinux-20060615-gcc in

Re: [uClinux-dev] Device driver types

2009-12-16 Thread Bernd Büttner
Write a character driver for this. You won't be happy with any other solution. If it is the first time you try to write a linux driver you should read Linux Device Drivers from O'Reilly. For me it was a great help (and is it still). Regards, Bernd David Wooff schrieb: Hello, I have read that

Re: [uClinux-dev] lighttpd / thttpd

2010-08-06 Thread Bernd Büttner
Ping Am 14.07.2010 11:38, schrieb Bernd Büttner: Has anyone ported lighttpd to uclinux? I'm using thttpd for years now and going to migrate to the newest distribution (20100315). But unfortunately thttpd doesn't work anymore. Error message is: Access Error Exception 12: Error on data read

[uClinux-dev] which mtd-utils should i use

2010-08-06 Thread Bernd Büttner
The actual distribution (20100628) still contains very very old mtd-utils. Which version from the mtd-utils git-tree is known to work with this distribution. I think the actual master won't do it, because they changed something in the library structure. Any hints? Bernd Büttner

Re: [uClinux-dev] [RFC] m68knommu: use user stack pointer hardware on some ColdFire cores

2011-02-08 Thread MKC GmbH - Bernd Büttner
As I understand the code, interrupts on all levels are blocked on entry of the service routine and enabled with rte instruction. Isn't it possible with seperate stacks to leave interrupts with higher levels enabled? At the moment any misbehaving interrupt can hold the timer-tick and thus freeze