UdmSearch: Reindexing only documents of a certain type?

2000-11-02 Thread Briggs, Gary
I'm running into problems with certain file types not being indexed properly [namely, postscript and pdf] I've been examinging my Mime type from/to/application entries in indexer.conf, and I think I've got the problem solved... unfortunately, I need to reindex all the ps and pdf files... but not

UdmSearch: New message on the WebBoard #1: Dynamically Genarated Pages

2000-11-02 Thread Hans Wolters
Author: Hans Wolters Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message: Well, hope I can help you there. Been having the same prob myself and finally found the solution: Within your config you should enable: Allow .* Then for the url's you would like to index you will have to add the % after it. i.e.:

Re: UdmSearch: Questions about cache

2000-11-02 Thread Alexander Barkov
Hi! Paul Stewart wrote: Hi there.. just a few questions.. I have successfully upgraded to the newest version and am running cache mode db Right now I'm building a brand new database as I"m told that's the only way to upgrade.. fine.. it works..:) After my initial indexing run, I

UdmSearch: New message on the WebBoard #1: Running indexer problem

2000-11-02 Thread Alexander Barkov
Author: Alexander Barkov Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message: I finally got msql and udmsearch compiled on this BSDI 4.1 box. But when I run indexer I get this error, % ./indexer ./indexer: can't load library 'libmysqlclient.so' I've got mysql-3.23.27-beta and udmsearch-3.0.23 running.

Re: UdmSearch: Reindexing only documents of a certain type?

2000-11-02 Thread Alexander Barkov
"Briggs, Gary" wrote: I'm running into problems with certain file types not being indexed properly [namely, postscript and pdf] I've been examinging my Mime type from/to/application entries in indexer.conf, and I think I've got the problem solved... unfortunately, I need to reindex all the

Re: UdmSearch: indexer -k : why?

2000-11-02 Thread Alexander Barkov
Jacob Friis Larsen wrote: If I run indexer with -k (skip locking (affects for MySQL and PostgreSQL)); Will that affect my search.cgi speed ? No. My guess is that indexer should lock only if there are more than one indexer running. Yes. If you are using one indexer, you may specify -k

UdmSearch: question about realm

2000-11-02 Thread Nagy Erno
Hi! I don't understand and I can't find documentation about realm, so I ask about it: If I use the realm option, it mean that indexer will fetch the zone from the DNS and index all the servers in that domain (or zone)? Or, what's the different from allow/server compinations and the realm option?

UdmSearch: Performance problem

2000-11-02 Thread Nagy Erno
Hello! I must run the indexer in parralel, but I can't with threads. My problem is this way is very slow, so I view the mysql logs, and I found interesting logs. It looks like if the mnogosearch 3.1.8 reindex a page first delete the words from database. It would be right, but it do word by word:

Re: UdmSearch: question about realm

2000-11-02 Thread Alexander Barkov
Nagy Erno wrote: Hi! I don't understand and I can't find documentation about realm, so I ask about it: If I use the realm option, it mean that indexer will fetch the zone from the DNS and index all the servers in that domain (or zone)? Imagine that you have: Realm \.de/ indexer will

UdmSearch: New message on the WebBoard #1: Does indexer skip non-meta tag pages?

2000-11-02 Thread Rick Hatfield
Author: Rick Hatfield Email: Message: I have 20,233 HTML files on my local drive and they are all HTML files. Now when I attempt to index them locally with mnogosearch version 3.1.8 only about half are indexed. Nearly as I can tell, the indexer may be skiping HTML files that do not have

UdmSearch: New message on the WebBoard #1: Unknown table 'robots' in where clause

2000-11-02 Thread Guido Adam
Author: Guido Adam Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message: Hi, I use mnogoSearch 3.1.8/MySQL under Linux 2.2.16. Indexing a database I get: Indexer[4867]: indexer from UdmSearch v.3.1.8/MySQL started with './etc/htdb.conf' Indexer[4867]: [1] http://192.168.27.244:8000/ Indexer[4867]: [1]

UdmSearch: New message on the WebBoard #1: solution!!!

2000-11-02 Thread Martin Perst
Author: Martin Perst Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message: clones were set to NO anyway .. Reply: http://search.mnogo.ru/board/message.php?id=656 __ If you want to unsubscribe send "unsubscribe udmsearch" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

UdmSearch: Expiry

2000-11-02 Thread Paul Stewart
Hi there.. I'm using the cache db mode If I change in my indexer.conf the expiry time to a much longer time, will this change be global to all sites including sites I've already indexed OR will it take effect the NEXT time they are indexed:) Thanks, Paul Stewart __ If you

UdmSearch: Caching Results

2000-11-02 Thread Paul Stewart
Hi there.. another question..:) The data that is stored in the var/cache directory from search results... can this stuff be deleted? Does it clean itself out every so often? Thanks. Paul Stewart __ If you want to unsubscribe send "unsubscribe udmsearch" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: UdmSearch: New message on the WebBoard #1: Segmentation Fault

2000-11-02 Thread Thomas Yengst
Alexander Barkov wrote: Author: Alexander Barkov Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message: It is a bug in HTDB, you may try to increase MaxDocSize in indexer.conf. This works - I have 100,000 rows in a table and increasing MaxDocSize by a factor of 10 makes indexer not seg-fault. Thomas --

UdmSearch: Indexer processes keep spawning...

2000-11-02 Thread David Robley
It's Friday afternoon so something has to go wrong with mnogosearch :-) Version 3.1.8 on Linux and the problem is that indexer -a keeps starting new processes, so that once all urls have been indexed, it keeps running through the site and adding words from urls that have already been indexed.

Re: UdmSearch: Caching Results

2000-11-02 Thread Alexander Barkov
Paul Stewart wrote: Hi there.. another question..:) The data that is stored in the var/cache directory from search results... can this stuff be deleted? You may delete it anytime. Does it clean itself out every so often? It does not clean itself, so you have to clean it after each