On Jan 23, 2008 10:07 AM, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Given that (as far as I can tell - let's see, that would be AFAICT), the
> resultSpec is *always* used in compiled mode (because the wrapper always
> compiles it), the current implementation would have the effect that
>
> 1) th
I don't know of any specific reason why not to do this, but just be
sure to review the history of this to make sure we aren't going around
in circles. It used to be that way, and it changed along with issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-355. Also look for
discussion of UIMA-355 in th
On Jan 13, 2008 2:52 PM, chandra sekhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Respected sir ,
> I did corrections according to your suggestions. I installed
> jdk-1_5_0-windows-i586.exe in C drive.
>
> now :
>
> JAVA_HOME : C:\jdk-1_5_0-windows-i586.exe
jdk-1_5_0-windows-i586.exe is an installer. That's
On Jan 11, 2008 8:56 AM, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It was also suggested that we use the maven "release" plugin to update
> the version stuff. I think we should investigate that for our next release.
>
The thing that's always bugged me about the release plugin is that I
don't thi
On Jan 7, 2008 6:56 AM, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried to figure out how the ResultSpecification handling in uima-core
> works with all side effects to check how it can be done
> to detect when a ResultSpec has changed. Unfortunately I was not able
> to, there are to much ope
On Dec 20, 2007 12:19 PM, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So - my preference would be mostly one of "don't care", but with a very
> slight leaning toward having the release event result in the creation of
> a new subdir under d/i/uima/ and under that, the
> set of files that go with tha
On Dec 18, 2007 8:55 AM, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I got the request on my table that the computation of the result spec
> for the capabilityLanguageFlow takes to much time.
> I looked at the code and found something interesting... maybe I'm wrong,
> I'm not sure.
>
> When
On Dec 17, 2007 4:01 PM, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Adam Lally wrote:
> > How about just calling ant from
> > the signRelease.sh script?
> >
> > -Adam
>
> Sure, except that (and correct me if I'm wrong) we then
> need a bu
On Dec 17, 2007 12:18 PM, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adam Lally wrote:
> > Well, I did see that the mvn install command has an option to generate
> > checksums:
> > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-install-plugin/install-mojo.html
> >
> >
> The call: "mvn assembly:assembly install"
> and it all seems to work. Since as usual
> with maven, I have no idea of what I'm doing,
> I would appreciate your help. Does anybody
> know of a way to do this better?
>
Well, I did see that the mvn install command has an option to generate
checksum
On Dec 17, 2007 9:55 AM, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The long thread on the incubator general list is concluding that these
> files don't need to be at the top level to meet the legal requirements,
> but the convention is to have them there, and if they are not there,
> some reviewe
On Dec 13, 2007 12:19 PM, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sure you all saw Ant's question. Anybody remember
> why it is the way it is? We must have had a reason at
> the time, but I sure don't remember what it was ;-)
>
> --Thilo
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Re:
+1
-Adam
On Dec 10, 2007 3:29 AM, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - We finished our testing according to uimaj-2.2.1 release plan.
> - All issues for release 2.2.1 are resolved and closed.
> - The RAT report looks good.
>
> All release artifacts are available on people.apache.org at
On Dec 7, 2007 12:29 PM, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Most of the resolved issues has been closed...
>(there are still 3 in resolved state: UIMA-522 (Adam), UIMA-158
> (Eddie), UIMA-575 (Eddie))
>
I closed UIMA-522.
> Please post if you have ended your testing. As soon as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Lally closed UIMA-522.
---
fixed
> XMI Serialization fails for parameterized arr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Lally reassigned UIMA-586:
---
Assignee: Eddie Epstein (was: Adam Lally)
Eddie maybe you or Burn can verify that this one is fixed
On Dec 5, 2007 1:21 PM, Eddie Epstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There was a discussion about this a few weeks ago. Here is part of my reply:
>
> When I did this on Windows it worked fine, but on Linux it hung because the
> deployed service didn't have a proper environment. In order to get it
> w
There seems to be something wrong with CPE managed (aka "local") mode
on Linux. I haven't been able to get even the example that ships with
UIMA to work.
I tried a few different Linux machines. One one I get an error
because ksh is not installed - opened a JIRA for that. On two others,
which do
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Collection Processing
Affects Versions: 2.2
Reporter: Adam Lally
Priority: Minor
I tried to test CPE managed deployment on a Linux machine and got the exception
message "/bin/ksh: not found". Thi
On Dec 4, 2007 4:27 PM, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In many places in our code we "box" ints using new Integer(anInt).
>
> Java 5, I discovered via some "findbugs" runs, now has a new static
> method in the Integer class, with a signature of
> Integer.valueOf(anInt)
>
> This is equi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Lally closed UIMA-534.
---
sanity check complete. Marshall passes. :)
> The equals() method in MetaDataObject_impl doesn't compare
On Nov 21, 2007 12:34 PM, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also don't see any name in the UIMA test plan for 2.2.1
> (http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/testplan221.html).
> Please add your name to the tests you would like to do during the test
> phase.
> I hope that I see each committer's
> Nov. 21
> Code Freeze, bug fixes only
> Nov. 22
> Start test phase
> Nov. 29
> End of test, start release vote
> Dec. 4
> Start vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Dec. 14
> Target release date
>
Works for me.
If we want UIMA-529 to be fixed, though, we should ch
On Nov 15, 2007 6:43 AM, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I created a test plan for release 2.2.1. It is available at:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/UIMA/TestPlan2.2.1
> The important release dates are:
> Nov. 19
> Code Freeze, bug fixes only
> Nov. 20
>
On Nov 14, 2007 12:00 PM, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK the remaining open issues are:
>
> - UIMA-583 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-583)
> I have already documented most of the issues mentioned in UIMA-583.
> But I can't do all. Please look at the issue comment.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Lally resolved UIMA-583.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Michael Baessler
I updated the JavaDocs for UimaContext.getSession() to
: Tools
Affects Versions: 2.2
Reporter: Adam Lally
In the CVD's FS display (lower left panel), if you expand an FSArray it will
only show you the first 20 elements. There should be a way to see all of the
elements, perhaps with the same powers-of-10 display that the index
On Nov 13, 2007 12:07 PM, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I still see three unresolved issues for release 2.3 (2.2.1). If we want
> to ship the release this year we should try to fix these issues soon.
> The open issues are:
> UIMA-598
> UIMA-583
> UIMA-529
>
> Volunteers?
>
I resolv
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Lally resolved UIMA-598.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Eddie Epstein (was: Adam Lally)
I believe I've fixed this leak.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Lally reassigned UIMA-598:
---
Assignee: Adam Lally
> Memory leak from CAS pool
> -
>
>
On Nov 13, 2007 3:55 AM, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree a test case would be fine, but I don't know how to add one.
> Since with Maven automatically all resources that are added to project
> test resources directory
> are also added to the system classpath for the tests. To t
On Nov 12, 2007 11:18 AM, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> unfortunately, the javadoc is lying. Michael has
> certainly tried this.
I guess I've gotten too complacent in assuming that the Javadoc is
always right. Usually that's a pretty good assumption.
Anyway, I have no problem with th
Hi Michael,
On Nov 12, 2007 10:28 AM, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> when the exception message is localized, the method
> getLocalizedMessage() is called on the MyException object. The
> getLocalizedMessage() method is not implemented in the MyException
> class, it is inherite
> Thilo Goetz commented on UIMA-616:
> --
>
> We don't need an ICLA for that small a change. However, if you think you
> might continue to make contributions (which I hope you do), it would be good
> to file an ICLA. They take a little bit to register, so the soo
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-629
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Examples, Tools
Affects Versions: 2.2
Reporter: Adam Lally
Priority: Minor
If the original source file name is not present in the CAS, the XmiCasWriter
names
+1 to wait until next release. When we get to that point, here's
something to consider for the JCAS - a way to enable the use of the
Java 5 enhanced for loop. This is based on code from Pablo Dubuoe,
who does have an ICLA on file and told me it was OK to contribute
(he's going on vacation otherwi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12541338
]
Adam Lally commented on UIMA-616:
-
Looks fine to me too.
Do we need an ICLA on file to commit this? I think
On Nov 7, 2007 8:20 AM, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't recall that we've actually decided on a
> version number for the next release. Since we're
> only fixing a handful of bugs and are not adding
> any new features (or are we?), I would like to
> suggest to call this release 2.2
On Nov 7, 2007 8:40 AM, Olivier Terrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> My BSF scripting annotator is almost ready to deliver as a zip in JIRA.
> However I have a last little problem I would like to share with you:
>
> I have made a pom.xml (largelly inspired from the one of the
> Whitespa
On Nov 5, 2007 7:47 AM, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No replays for more than two weeks now... what does this mean?
> It is not necessary to do the release refresh, or we just found no
> volunteer?
> If we still think it is necessary to do the refresh I will do the
> release manage
On 10/30/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This sounds like a great addition to the framework - the ability to have
> annotators that are based on the Bean Scripting Framework, especially
> for quick tasks. We have some capability for this in the framework
> already for Perl and Pyth
On 10/30/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While fixing another bug, I came across a compile error in the uimaj-cpe
> project in svn: in the file:
> uimaj-cpe/src/test/java/org/apache/uima/collection/impl/SingleDocCollectionReader.java
> which has this line: assert(!done); in the c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12538794
]
Adam Lally commented on UIMA-607:
-
For multiple instances of the same AE, which share a classpath and datapath, I
On 10/22/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eddie Epstein wrote:
> > Consider the following code:
> > AnalysisEngine ae = UIMAFramework.produceAnalysisEngine(specifier);
> > CAS cas = ae.newCAS();
> > cas.setDocumentText("some text");
> > AnnotationFS fs =
On 10/19/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Trust me in this. I will do nothing that means
> a major performance degradation for low-level
> annotators.
>
> It's interesting that you all seem to be expecting
> a performance degradation. I'm really hoping for
> an improvement :-)
Well I
On 10/18/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was planning to do the refactoring in the trunk. Once
> I'm in a position where I have encapsulated the heap so
> far as to even be able to experiment, I will do that in
> a private workspace. I will certainly not switch the
> heap impl with
On 10/17/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm thinking about experimenting with alternative heap
> implementations in the CAS. In particular, I would like
> to try out a heap impl that uses regular Java objects to
> represent feature structures, as opposed to our proprietary
> binary h
On 10/15/07, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think now it is time to discuss how we should proceed with the Sandbox
> components and how we will release them.
> The Sandbox is a place to develop components or tooling and to play with
> new technologies around UIMA. If some o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Lally resolved UIMA-586.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Bug when merging CASes using XmiDeserializat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Lally reassigned UIMA-586:
---
Assignee: Adam Lally
> Bug when merging CASes using XmiDeserializat
On 10/2/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) The element "resourceSpecifier" is serving as a "choice" in several
> places, but the choices it provides are too broad. It serves as a
> choice by being declared "abstract", and having
> taeDescription,
> analysisEngineDescription,
> file
Just a reminder that we need to report this month. Due date is October 10.
-Adam
On 9/27/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's so urgent that requires a hotfix or release
> immediately? I don't see anything that couldn't wait
> another couple of months, IMHO. People can always
> build from source if there is a fix they must have.
>
This one's pretty ugly:
http:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Lally closed UIMA-578.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> XmiCasDeserializer "merge" functionality doesn't supp
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Core Java Framework
Affects Versions: 2.2
Reporter: Adam Lally
Assignee: Adam Lally
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 2.3
Eddie found a bug in the XmiCasDeserializerTest unit test that masked this
actual bug in t
On 9/4/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anybody know why ArrayFS does not extend
> CommonArrayFS? Anything riding on that? If
> nobody screams, I'll open a Jira issue and fix
> this for the next release. Then you can get
> the array length with
>
> ((CommonArrayFS) fs).size();
>
Versions: 2.2
Reporter: Adam Lally
Assignee: Adam Lally
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 2.3
Part of UIMA-400 that was not fixed:
lib/uima-jcas-builtin-types.jar is listed in manifest, but not present in
plugin.
It is still present in UIMA 2.2 release, though it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12523564
]
Adam Lally commented on UIMA-400:
-
Thanks for pointing that out. I fixed it under a new issue UIMA-549.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Lally closed UIMA-549.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Extra jar listed in runtime plugin manif
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Lally closed UIMA-547.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> XmiCasDeserializer fails to deserialize arrays if JCAS has been initiali
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12522568
]
Adam Lally commented on UIMA-547:
-
Also looks like it could affect XCAS deserialization for certain array types
Type: Bug
Components: Core Java Framework
Affects Versions: 2.2
Reporter: Adam Lally
Assignee: Adam Lally
Fix For: 2.3
If the JCAS has been initialized, subsequently attempting to deserialize an XMI
CAS containing an array will fail with an error
On 8/23/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adam Lally wrote:
> > On 8/23/07, Jörn Kottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> is it possible to define subtypes of lists and array types in uima ?
> >>
&
On 8/23/07, Jörn Kottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is it possible to define subtypes of lists and array types in uima ?
>
You cannot create subtypes of arrays, but I believe you can create
subtypes of lists.
There's a method Type.isInheritanceFinal() that can be used to
determine t
On 8/22/07, Jörn Kottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to suggest that we use java annotations
> for the classes which implement an AE.
>
> The configuration parameters can be defined via java annotations
> and then injected into the AE before initializing.
> The implementor
On 8/21/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> 2. Its build as RCP application (this requires an eclipse install)
> >> and packaged for each
> >> platform we want to support (win, linux and mac).
> I also found this: http://vyzivus.host.sk/maven2-build-plugin-howto.html
> It describes b
On 8/17/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any reason why we don't factor some common POM elements to the
> parent?
>
> Some candidates:
>
>
>
I wasn't sure what the apache requirements were here. They might want
the license information to be in every pom and not just in t
On 8/15/07, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Baessler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > does the UIMA framework has a method to evaluate a feature path as
> > String value?
> >
> > -- Michael
> >
> >
> >
> No response... does this mean, there is no such method or nobody have
> read this?
On 8/13/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) Type Foo, feature Bar - range type FSArray whose element type is Baz
> Type Foo, feature Bar - range type FSArray whose element type is NotBaz
>
> (Should throw an exception?)
>
> 2) Type Foo, feature Bar - range type FSArray, whose el
On 8/13/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't feel very strongly one way or another about this, but lean
> toward redoing
> the release (sorry!) if we want to keep the release notes "hard-coded"
> in our
> distribution.
>
> But if everyone else feels this is just too trivial to re
> Hm, it doesn't look like that's possible. Seems like a missing API
> feature. If you need it, please open a JIRA issue.
>
I think it's possible only through the low-level TypeSystem API:
LowLevelTypeSystem lts = aTypeSystem.getLowLevelTypeSystem();
return lts.ll_getStringSet(lts.ll_ge
On 8/13/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've had a few days to do regression testing
> on this level, and nothing new has come up.
>
> The release artifacts are available on people.a.o at
> /home/twgoetz/uima-distributions/2.2/RC8
>
> So please cast your vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release RC8 a
On 8/10/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, has anybody tested that this really works in
> the sense that we can create an annotator with
> maven that gets our jars from a repository?
I tried it, pointing at the repository in my public_html, and it worked.
-Adam
I verified that my regress test scripts run on RC8.
It would be good if someone can test that the source distribution
builds, seeing as I was messing with the Maven configuration recently.
Thanks,
-Adam
On 8/10/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have also uploaded my staging repository in
> the "maven" subdirectory. One question: our jars
> in the mvn repo have version numbers. Is that as
> intended, given that our jars normally don't?
Yes, this is intended. As far as I know Maven
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Lally resolved UIMA-522.
-
Resolution: Fixed
turns out there was not an actual problem. The unit test was in error.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Lally reopened UIMA-522:
-
There is still a problem when multipleReferencesAllows=true
> XMI Serialization fails for parameteri
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Lally resolved UIMA-521.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Michael Baessler (was: Adam Lally)
This should be fixed now. I had to
It looks like the Maven eclipse plugin just doesn't handle resource
directories that are outside of the project itself. It tries to add
them as source folders which Eclipse doesn't support.
So I've gone back to using ant to copy the LICENSE, NOTICE, and
DISCLAIMER files from uimaj-distr/src/main/
On 8/9/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I spent a long time today trying to get ssh configured to login
> using PKI: I give up, I don't want to spend more time on this.
> Can I just upload those artifacts manually, or does maven do
> any magic while it's doing that?
>
> --Thilo
>
I don
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Lally reopened UIMA-521:
-
Assignee: Adam Lally (was: Marshall Schor)
this fix broke mvn eclipse:eclipse
> Add LICE
Argh. Yes, I see this too. Will look into it.
-Adam
On 8/9/07, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems that with the recent changes in the POMs we run into an issue
> when re-generating our eclipse project files.
> I didn't get any project compiled after I regenerate the
On 8/8/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've found some places in Apache docs where it seems to be true that the
> Maven artifacts themselves,
> do need to be signed. One of these is the ref to releasing "Struts",
> found here:
> http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/creating-and-signin
On 8/8/07, Adam Lally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will try to add a -deploy option to extractAndBuild script which
> will execute this, and I plan to (eventually) put this information on
> the Wiki "Instructions for Committers" page.
>
Done and done.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Lally closed UIMA-524.
---
Resolution: Fixed
fixed
> Prepare for distribution of UIMA artifacts in Maven reposit
On 8/8/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For uimaj-2.2.0 I created a directory, and collected all the
> various release candidate tags under it. For 2.1.0, we
> didn't do that, and it's a bit disorganized. Anybody mind
> if I retroactively create a uimaj-2.1.0 dir and move all
> 2.1 ta
OK, I think I've gotten deployment of our Maven artifacts to a
"staging repository" to work. I committed a change to the uimaj
pom.xml:
staging-repository
scpexe://people.apache.org/home/alally/public_html/uima-2.2.0-incubating/maven/
This URL indicates
On 8/8/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the uimaj project's pom, the element points to itself.
I don't see any element in the uimaj project's pom.
> Also, there are two elements defining the javadoc plugin - is this
> intentional, or should/can
> these be merged?
>
They are d
Next problem is that mvn repository:bundle-create complains about a
missing LICENSE.txt file. What's that about!?
Looking in incubator general for other projects that asked the IPMC to
ratify their maven artifacts, it looks like the preferred approach is
to set up a "staging" repository in somebo
On 8/8/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure, that would be good. I'm currently building a new level, I'll
> create the maven artifacts manually for this one.
>
I'm actually having some trouble at the moment... For one thing mvn
repository:bundle-create fails when I run it on the root
Components: Build, Packaging and Test
Reporter: Adam Lally
Assignee: Adam Lally
Fix For: 2.2
Add required and sections to POM files.
Update extractAndBuild script to build the Maven bundles necessary for upload
(including source jars)
--
This message is
On 8/8/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adam Lally wrote:
> > This page describes how to create bundles to upload to a repository:
> > http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-central-repository-upload.html
>
> Sorry, but I'm not sure how we're
On 8/8/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reading the above link - it specifies "requirements" for the pom file
> for things going into
> the Maven repository, which our POM doesn't have. 2 I found missing
> were the
> and the elements.
>
Good catch - I will add these right away.
> Thilo Goetz commented on UIMA-522:
> --
>
> Adam, is this fixed with your changes to 476? Can we close this as
> duplicate? Thanks.
>
>
Oops, sorry I meant to resolve UIMA-522 yesterday as well. It's not a
duplicate and has its own subversion commits.
-Adam
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Lally resolved UIMA-522.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed. I will close once I re-test on the next release candidate.
> XMI Serializat
On 8/7/07, Eddie Epstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There appears to be a problem in casCompleteSerialization associated
> with multivalued properties and FS references. This was just found
> late yesterday. Please let us track this down later today.
>
Yes, there are indeed some problems. Can I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Lally resolved UIMA-476.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Thilo Goetz (was: Adam Lally)
I updated CASMgrSerializer, changing the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Lally reopened UIMA-476:
-
Assignee: Adam Lally (was: Thilo Goetz)
The multipleReferencesAllowed flag on each Feature is being
Affects Versions: 2.1
Reporter: Adam Lally
Assignee: Adam Lally
Fix For: 2.2
When a parameterized array (an array with an elementType) is serialized to XMI,
the elements of the array are not correctly added to the queue of FSs to be
serialized. That means
On 8/7/07, Adam Lally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maven automatically generates "sources" jar files (check your local
> Maven repository). Unfortunately these don't have the DISCLAIMER,
> LICENSE, NOTICES. I will see if I can figure out how to get those to
> be
201 - 300 of 1623 matches
Mail list logo
